← Back to home
Comparison · Support

Hatz AI vs Request Tracker

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Hatz AI and Request Tracker — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Hatz AI vs Request Tracker: at a glance

FeatureHatz AIRequest Tracker
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score7.50.0
Sparks · 30d20
Top themesmsp, ai-platform, phone-agents, trainingticketing, security-releases, multi-branch, cve
Last editorial update4d ago6d ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Hatz AI?

Hatz pulls its training platform off TalentLMS and runs it inside the tenant.

Hatz is an AI platform sold through managed service providers. Hatz Learn now runs natively in the tenant dashboard instead of a separate TalentLMS site, with completed courses and certifications migrated across. Tenant admins can also request a phone agent themselves, with MSP admins reviewing the exact configuration and billing starting on approval, and GLM-5.3-Flash joins the model selector.

Read the full Hatz AI trajectory →

What is Request Tracker?

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

Read the full Request Tracker trajectory →

Hatz AI vs Request Tracker: editorial side-by-side

H
Hatz AI
SUPPORT
7.5

Hatz pulls its training platform off TalentLMS and runs it inside the tenant.

◆ Current state

Hatz is an AI platform sold through managed service providers. Hatz Learn now runs natively in the tenant dashboard instead of a separate TalentLMS site, with completed courses and certifications migrated across. Tenant admins can also request a phone agent themselves, with MSP admins reviewing the exact configuration and billing starting on approval, and GLM-5.3-Flash joins the model selector.

◆ Where it's heading

Since Hatz Activate, the work has been about making the MSP-to-tenant boundary self-service rather than manual: tenants request phone agents instead of asking, PSA imports become selective rather than all-or-nothing, and phone agents start from templates that write their own instructions. Absorbing the learning platform fits that pattern — one fewer vendor and one fewer login between the customer and the product. Model additions continue on their usual cadence.

◆ Prediction

With training in-house and phone agents self-requested, expect the next releases to extend the same request-and-approve pattern to other provisioning that still requires an MSP admin to act.

R0.0

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

◆ Current state

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

◆ Where it's heading

The branch structure is consolidating. RT 4.4 reached its last planned release at 4.4.9 in October 2025, with users pointed at 5 or 6, and 6.0 is where features now land: dashboard saved searches gained pagination and sorting, statuses take colors from lifecycle configuration, custom fields display multi-column by default, and keyboard menu navigation improved. The 5.0 line still gets real work but of a narrower kind, such as the inline CSS handling in ticket history that shipped with 5.0.10. Expect the same-day multi-branch security release to remain the pattern for as long as two branches are supported.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another coordinated security pair on 5.0 and 6.0, with feature work continuing to accumulate only on 6.0.

Alternatives to Hatz AI and Request Tracker

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Hatz AI or Request Tracker.

See all Hatz AI alternatives → · See all Request Tracker alternatives →

Recent activity from Hatz AI and Request Tracker

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5d agoHatz AIHatz Learn moves off TalentLMS into the tenant dashboard
  2. 12d agoHatz AIShared Integration Credentials, Gemini 3.7 Flash, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813, Phone Agent Tools and Approved Callers
  3. 19d agoHatz AIAttachment-Only Messages, Tenant Renaming, Invoices Over the API, Phone Agent Drafts and Silence Controls
  4. 26d agoHatz AIDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Self-Reporting Credit Usage, Phone Agent Pause/Reassign/Duplicate, Artifact Presentation Mode, Auto-Tool Selection Notice
  5. 29d agoHatz AIHatz Activate: a Shadow AI scan and an MSP rollout console
  6. 1mo agoHatz AIAutoTool v2, Optimized Phone Agent Pricing, MSP Workshop Categories for Agents
  7. 3mo agoRequest TrackerSecurity release fixes REST 2.0 credential disclosure and SQL injection
  8. 3mo agoRequest TrackerSame security fixes as 5.0.10, plus dashboard and accessibility work
  9. 10mo agoRequest TrackerCalendar view for saved searches and memory management work
  10. 10mo agoRequest TrackerCSV injection fix in TSV export, with assorted updates
  11. 10mo agoRequest TrackerFinal RT 4.4 release closes the branch with one security fix
  12. 1y agoRequest TrackerRelease exists mainly to support RTIR 6.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Hatz AI and Request Tracker?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Hatz AI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Hatz AI better than Request Tracker?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Hatz AI is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Hatz AI?

Top Hatz AI alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Hatz AI alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/hatz-ai for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Request Tracker?

Top Request Tracker alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Request Tracker alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/request-tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.