ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus
ServiceDesk Plus moved upstream of the ticket, then spent the week tidying the sidebar
Comparison · Support
Request Tracker vs Sleekplan
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Request Tracker and Sleekplan — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Request Tracker vs Sleekplan: at a glance
What is Request Tracker?
Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.
Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.
What is Sleekplan?
Sleekplan is making the public feedback board safe to run with real customers on it
Sleekplan runs feedback boards and roadmaps, publishing short changelog entries behind emoji headlines — the feed truncates each to about 280 characters against sources running near 2,000, so nothing here can be judged without fetching the source. The recent run has built out the board's structure with Documents and Components, added internal statuses, connected a workspace to ChatGPT, and now shipped two identity releases on the same day: SCIM directory sync and controls that hide who a customer is.
Request Tracker vs Sleekplan: editorial side-by-side
Request Tracker
0.0SUPPORT
Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.
◆ Current state
Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.
◆ Where it's heading
The branch structure is consolidating. RT 4.4 reached its last planned release at 4.4.9 in October 2025, with users pointed at 5 or 6, and 6.0 is where features now land: dashboard saved searches gained pagination and sorting, statuses take colors from lifecycle configuration, custom fields display multi-column by default, and keyboard menu navigation improved. The 5.0 line still gets real work but of a narrower kind, such as the inline CSS handling in ticket history that shipped with 5.0.10. Expect the same-day multi-branch security release to remain the pattern for as long as two branches are supported.
◆ Prediction
The next release is most likely another coordinated security pair on 5.0 and 6.0, with feature work continuing to accumulate only on 6.0.
Sleekplan
7.5SUPPORT
Sleekplan is making the public feedback board safe to run with real customers on it
◆ Current state
Sleekplan runs feedback boards and roadmaps, publishing short changelog entries behind emoji headlines — the feed truncates each to about 280 characters against sources running near 2,000, so nothing here can be judged without fetching the source. The recent run has built out the board's structure with Documents and Components, added internal statuses, connected a workspace to ChatGPT, and now shipped two identity releases on the same day: SCIM directory sync and controls that hide who a customer is.
◆ Where it's heading
The work has turned toward the problems a B2B company hits when its feedback board is public. One release replaces customer usernames with generated handles and hides real names from everyone but the team, closing the gap where a competitor could type a name into the @mention autocomplete to learn who a customer is. The other pushes both dashboard seats and portal users into an identity provider's control, so joiners get access, leavers are anonymized, and provider attributes land on portal users as segmentable fields. Both make the board something an enterprise can host without leaking its customer list.
◆ Prediction
Attributes arriving from the directory are described as segmentation inputs, so expect board filtering and reporting to start consuming them — the sync is only worth the setup if the resulting segments show up where teams read feedback.
Alternatives to Request Tracker and Sleekplan
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Request Tracker or Sleekplan.
Chatway
Chatway's bot learned to read the store; now the store can listen back
ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus Cloud
ManageEngine's cloud service desk drips small fixes; its AI arrives data center by data center
Desk365
Asset management is the real build; the feed is mostly an interview series.
Formbricks
Formbricks spends a whole RC train on making enterprise SSO stop breaking.
Hatz AI
Hatz pulls its training platform off TalentLMS and runs it inside the tenant.
See all Request Tracker alternatives → · See all Sleekplan alternatives →
Recent activity from Request Tracker and Sleekplan
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1d agoSleekplanCustomer Identity Controls: Random Usernames & Hidden Names 🔒
- 1d agoSleekplanIntroducing Directory Sync (SCIM)
- 9d agoSleekplanInternal statuses
- 15d agoSleekplanIntroducing Components: the second axis your board was missing
- 15d agoSleekplanIntroducing Documents: the thinking behind your feedback, in one place 📝 ⚡
- 16d agoSleekplanConnect a workspace to ChatGPT; anonymized public boards ⚡
- 3mo agoRequest TrackerSecurity release fixes REST 2.0 credential disclosure and SQL injection
- 3mo agoRequest TrackerSame security fixes as 5.0.10, plus dashboard and accessibility work
- 10mo agoRequest TrackerCalendar view for saved searches and memory management work
- 10mo agoRequest TrackerCSV injection fix in TSV export, with assorted updates
- 10mo agoRequest TrackerFinal RT 4.4 release closes the branch with one security fix
- 1y agoRequest TrackerRelease exists mainly to support RTIR 6.0.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Request Tracker and Sleekplan?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Sleekplan is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Request Tracker better than Sleekplan?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Sleekplan is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 0.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Request Tracker?
Top Request Tracker alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Request Tracker alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/request-tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Sleekplan?
Top Sleekplan alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Sleekplan alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sleekplan for the full list with editorial commentary on each.