Sleekplan
Sleekplan is making the public feedback board safe to run with real customers on it
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Frill and Respond.io — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Frill | Respond.io |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Support | Comms, Support |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 7.5 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | feedback-management, mcp, ai-summaries, programmatic-access | omnichannel-inbox, messaging-channels, ai-agents, workflow-automation |
| Last editorial update | 19d ago | 5d ago |
| Website | Visit → | — |
Frill is turning its feedback board from a destination into something machines read on demand.
The MCP server is the centrepiece: ten tools, one API key, no configuration, callable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Intercom Fin, and included on every plan rather than gated. The Chrome extension follows the same instinct from the capture side — grab an idea wherever you spot it, and collapse a long help desk thread into a clean idea with an AI summary in one click. Behind both sits the June groundwork: a public npm SDK, multiple API keys, webhook handling, and MCP in public beta.
respond.io is widening the inbox again after landing Copilot and metered AI credits.
Early August was respond.io's AI moment: Copilot arrived in every workspace with an agent builder that drafts and test-runs an AI agent, and AI Credit On-Demand started billing overage instead of cutting AI off at the plan limit. Since then the work has moved back to the inbox itself - a Microsoft 365 and Outlook email channel, TikTok Business Messaging for US-registered accounts, conversation collaborators who can act without reassignment, a missed-call follow-up template, and now a contact's Google Calendar meetings shown beside the conversation.
The MCP server is the centrepiece: ten tools, one API key, no configuration, callable from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Intercom Fin, and included on every plan rather than gated. The Chrome extension follows the same instinct from the capture side — grab an idea wherever you spot it, and collapse a long help desk thread into a clean idea with an AI summary in one click. Behind both sits the June groundwork: a public npm SDK, multiple API keys, webhook handling, and MCP in public beta.
Frill is systematically removing the requirement to be in Frill. Capture moves to wherever the conversation already happens; retrieval moves to whatever assistant the team already uses. That reframes the product as the feedback store rather than the feedback interface, and the pricing decision reinforces it — putting MCP on every plan optimises for the corpus being queried, not for upsell. The earlier enterprise work (EU hosting, EntraID SSO, CSP) is what makes that store trustworthy enough to hold the data.
Expect write paths to follow the read paths — an assistant that can already ask what users want will next be expected to file, merge and status ideas — and expect more capture surfaces beyond the browser extension.
Early August was respond.io's AI moment: Copilot arrived in every workspace with an agent builder that drafts and test-runs an AI agent, and AI Credit On-Demand started billing overage instead of cutting AI off at the plan limit. Since then the work has moved back to the inbox itself - a Microsoft 365 and Outlook email channel, TikTok Business Messaging for US-registered accounts, conversation collaborators who can act without reassignment, a missed-call follow-up template, and now a contact's Google Calendar meetings shown beside the conversation.
The pattern is accumulation around a single conversation view rather than depth in any one channel. Each release adds either a place messages arrive from or a piece of context that used to require another tab, and most ship as pre-built workflow templates or read-only panels rather than as new configuration for an admin to learn. With AI usage now metered rather than capped, every surface feeding the inbox is also more material for agents billed against those credits - the channel expansion and the AI pricing change point the same way.
The calendar integration is read-only and sends users to Google to create or edit, which is the obvious next gap to close. Beyond that, expect channel availability to keep opening region by region on the TikTok pattern rather than new channel types arriving.
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial trajectory or compare directly with Frill.
Sleekplan is making the public feedback board safe to run with real customers on it
ServiceDesk Plus moved upstream of the ticket, then spent the week tidying the sidebar
Chatway's bot learned to read the store; now the store can listen back
ManageEngine's cloud service desk drips small fixes; its AI arrives data center by data center
Asset management is the real build; the feed is mostly an interview series.
Formbricks spends a whole RC train on making enterprise SSO stop breaking.
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial trajectory or compare directly with Respond.io.
Slack raises the Marketplace bar back to ten installs while the agent platform consolidates.
Synapse publishes only a changelog link, so its feed records releases without describing them
Element X Android ships roughly weekly, alternating real features with fix rounds
Calling is the one surface Wire's web client touches in every documented release.
Zoho retells Cliq 7.0 as an AI story, and lets customers pick whose model tells it.
Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Respond.io is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 6.3), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Respond.io is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 6.3), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
Top Frill alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Frill alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/frill for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Respond.io alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Respond.io alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/respond-io for the full list with editorial commentary on each.