Discourse
Monthly releases on time, security out-of-band, and the changelog living somewhere else
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Canny and Formbricks — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
| Feature | Canny | Formbricks |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Support | Support |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| Sparks · 30d | 1 | 0 |
| Top themes | product feedback, revenue attribution, mcp, crm integration | release-candidates, multi-tenancy, backports, self-hosting |
| Last editorial update | 1d ago | 10h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
Canny is wiring product feedback to revenue, and letting Autopilot collect it without anyone asking
Canny's two active tracks are automatic feedback capture and revenue attribution. Autopilot now pulls from Fathom and Grain call recordings and auto-links open Salesforce and HubSpot opportunities, so signals arrive without anyone filing them. The rebuilt Reporting tab splits into Ideas, Autopilot and Portal, carrying customer requests against renewal risk, open pipeline tied to ideas, and features ranked by churned revenue. Alongside that, the MCP server has grown past 55 tools and views gained per-user sharing controls.
Formbricks is spending its release candidates on tenancy isolation, not new survey features.
Formbricks ships almost exclusively release candidates across three live branches — 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 — with the same fixes backported into each. Recent work is dominated by multi-tenant scoping (API keys, surveys, quotas, integrations), auth correctness (Better Auth credential accounts, 2FA tables, Azure SSO), and self-host reliability (Helm ordering, Docker environment validation). New user-facing capability is rare, and when it appears it is narrow: chart tweaks, an MCP scope correction.
Canny's two active tracks are automatic feedback capture and revenue attribution. Autopilot now pulls from Fathom and Grain call recordings and auto-links open Salesforce and HubSpot opportunities, so signals arrive without anyone filing them. The rebuilt Reporting tab splits into Ideas, Autopilot and Portal, carrying customer requests against renewal risk, open pipeline tied to ideas, and features ranked by churned revenue. Alongside that, the MCP server has grown past 55 tools and views gained per-user sharing controls.
The through-line is removing the two things that make a feedback tool decay: someone has to enter the feedback, and no one can prove it mattered. Autopilot handles the first by ingesting calls and CRM records directly; the revenue reports handle the second by attaching renewal risk, pipeline and churn figures to individual features. The MCP surface and the new view permissions suggest the same data is being readied for both agents and larger admin teams.
Expect the Autopilot source list to keep growing past Fathom and Grain into other call and support channels, and the reporting side to deepen its CRM ties. With 55-plus MCP tools already covering create and delete paths, agent-driven triage of the idea backlog is the natural next step.
Formbricks ships almost exclusively release candidates across three live branches — 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 — with the same fixes backported into each. Recent work is dominated by multi-tenant scoping (API keys, surveys, quotas, integrations), auth correctness (Better Auth credential accounts, 2FA tables, Azure SSO), and self-host reliability (Helm ordering, Docker environment validation). New user-facing capability is rare, and when it appears it is narrow: chart tweaks, an MCP scope correction.
The pattern points at a product hardening for paid, self-hosted, multi-workspace deployments rather than expanding what a survey can do. Nearly every entry is a fix carrying a backport tag, which means the team is maintaining several supported lines at once — a maintenance load that usually arrives with enterprise customers who cannot upgrade on the project's schedule. The one forward-looking thread is the MCP surface: OAuth consent handling and a surveys:write scope suggest agents are being treated as a real client rather than a demo.
Expect the 5.3 line to stabilize into a general release carrying the workspace-scoping and auth fixes already landed, with MCP scope work continuing alongside it. Whether MCP becomes a headline capability or stays plumbing is not something these entries settle.
Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Canny or Formbricks.
Monthly releases on time, security out-of-band, and the changelog living somewhere else
Twilio is selling trust: branded calls, scoped keys, and stricter sender vetting.
Comm100 publishes buyer-guide content, not releases — and the guides now lead with AI volume.
The cloud edition's log is mostly repair work, much of it inherited from its on-prem twin.
AI assist is spreading edition by edition and region by region, one data center at a time.
A Teams-native helpdesk whose changelog is mostly a marketing blog.
See all Canny alternatives → · See all Formbricks alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — mcp — within Support. Canny and Formbricks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Canny and Formbricks are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.
Top Canny alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Canny alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/canny for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top Formbricks alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Formbricks alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/formbricks for the full list with editorial commentary on each.