Tracecat ships semantic table search and fast-expands its MCP integration catalog at v1.0 GA
Reclaim.ai alternatives
The best Reclaim.ai alternatives in project management tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.
Updated Sep 26, 2026
Looking for the best alternatives to Reclaim.ai? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in project management tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, Reclaim.ai shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 2.5 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.
About Reclaim.ai
Reclaim's roadmap has narrowed to OOO and Slack polish as its release cadence slows
Reclaim's recent shipping is concentrated on out-of-office and Slack integration — custom Slack OOO auto-replies and team OOO calendars are its only two 2026 entries. The rest of the visible feed is from 2025 (a Slack app overhaul, travel timezones, scheduling-link branding). The cadence has thinned noticeably, with multi-month gaps between releases.
Velocity 2.5 · Last update 3mo ago
Top 12 alternatives to Reclaim.ai
Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.
SmartSuite ships EU data residency, linked record filters, and API control improvements in a dense September release.
Rize pivots from solo time tracker to agency operations platform with invoicing, profitability reporting, and a ChatGPT integration.
Aha! ships MCP connectors for Elle and opens Builder to 3,000+ integrations, deepening AI product workflows
Fibery rebuilds its AI agent from scratch and ships OAuth Apps, accelerating its MCP-first agentic platform bet.
NocoBase is hardening its AI employees and security surfaces while stabilizing the v2 client.
Hive keeps iterating on proofing and dashboard UX — workmanlike improvements, no pivot.
Atarim exposes its AI agents' memory to users and validates the 5.1 cost cuts, accelerating toward auditable agentic automation.
Productboard v2 makes entity types per-workspace, breaking fixed-enum clients in favor of extensibility
Float adds AI experience profiles and multi-currency rate cards — expanding from scheduling into project economics.
My Hours ships MCP support for Claude — time logging and timesheet retrieval are now conversational operations.
Asana embeds AI into Slack threads and closes the rich-text gap with Notion
Reclaim.ai vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance
Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.
| Product | Velocity | Sparks · 30d | Focus areas | Latest release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reclaim.ai (baseline) | 2.5 | 0 | calendar-schedulingslackout-of-office | — |
| Tracecat | 8.8 | 1 | security-automationmcp-integrationssemantic-search | Tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.4 |
| SmartSuite | 8.8 | 1 | work-managementno-codedata-residency | Sign-Up: Choose Your Data Region |
| Rize | 8.8 | 1 | time-trackingagenciesinvoicing | Rize Is Now an Official ChatGPT Partner |
| Aha! | 8.8 | 1 | product-managementai-assistantmcp | Connect AI applications created with Aha! Builder to 3,000+ tools |
| Fibery | 7.5 | 2 | ai-agentmcpcustom-apps | September 17, 2026 / New Fibery AI Agent, Whiteboards and AI, Space templates with files and images, OAuth Applications |
| NocoBase | 7.5 | 0 | no-codeai-employeesknowledge-base | — |
| Hive | 6.3 | 0 | proofingdashboardsproject-management | — |
| Atarim | 6.3 | 1 | ai-agencywordpress-automationagentic-memory | Atarim 5.1.2: your experts' memory is now yours to read and edit |
| Productboard | 6.3 | 1 | product-managementapi-extensibilityroadmap-tooling | EntityType moves from fixed enum to workspace-specific open string |
| Float | 6.3 | 0 | resource-managementschedulingai-matching | Smart insights: know who’s done this work before, with AI experience profiles |
| My Hours | 6.3 | 1 | time-trackingmcpai-assistants | My Hours MCP for Claude |
| Asana | 6.3 | 0 | project-managementai-integrationenterprise-compliance | 🎉 @mention Asana in Slack to create tasks and get answers |
The 12 best Reclaim.ai alternatives, in depth
1. Tracecat · velocity 8.8
Tracecat ships semantic table search and fast-expands its MCP integration catalog at v1.0 GA.
Over the last 30 days Tracecat shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “Tracecat 1.1.0-alpha.4”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Tracecat focuses on security automation, mcp integrations and semantic search.
Over the last 30 days Tracecat has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full Tracecat trajectory → · Compare Reclaim.ai vs Tracecat →
2. SmartSuite · velocity 8.8
SmartSuite ships EU data residency, linked record filters, and API control improvements in a dense September release.
Over the last 30 days SmartSuite shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “Sign-Up: Choose Your Data Region”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, SmartSuite focuses on work management, no code and data residency.
Over the last 30 days SmartSuite has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full SmartSuite trajectory → · Compare Reclaim.ai vs SmartSuite →
3. Rize · velocity 8.8
Rize pivots from solo time tracker to agency operations platform with invoicing, profitability reporting, and a ChatGPT integration.
Over the last 30 days Rize shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “Rize Is Now an Official ChatGPT Partner”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Rize focuses on time tracking, agencies and invoicing.
Over the last 30 days Rize has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
4. Aha! · velocity 8.8
Aha! ships MCP connectors for Elle and opens Builder to 3,000+ integrations, deepening AI product workflows.
Over the last 30 days Aha! shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “Connect AI applications created with Aha! Builder to 3,000+ tools”. Its velocity score of 8.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Aha! focuses on product management, ai assistant and mcp.
Over the last 30 days Aha! has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
5. Fibery · velocity 7.5
Fibery rebuilds its AI agent from scratch and ships OAuth Apps, accelerating its MCP-first agentic platform bet.
Over the last 30 days Fibery shipped 2 meaningful updates vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “September 17, 2026 / New Fibery AI Agent, Whiteboards and AI, Space templates with files and images, OAuth Applications”. Its velocity score of 7.5/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Fibery focuses on ai agent, mcp and custom apps.
Over the last 30 days Fibery has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
6. NocoBase · velocity 7.5
NocoBase is hardening its AI employees and security surfaces while stabilizing the v2 client.
Its velocity score of 7.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, NocoBase focuses on no code, ai employees and knowledge base.
NocoBase and Reclaim.ai have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Full NocoBase trajectory → · Compare Reclaim.ai vs NocoBase →
7. Hive · velocity 6.3
Hive keeps iterating on proofing and dashboard UX — workmanlike improvements, no pivot.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Hive focuses on proofing, dashboards and project management.
Hive and Reclaim.ai have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
8. Atarim · velocity 6.3
Atarim exposes its AI agents' memory to users and validates the 5.1 cost cuts, accelerating toward auditable agentic automation.
Over the last 30 days Atarim shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “Atarim 5.1.2: your experts' memory is now yours to read and edit”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Atarim focuses on ai agency, wordpress automation and agentic memory.
Over the last 30 days Atarim has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
9. Productboard · velocity 6.3
Productboard v2 makes entity types per-workspace, breaking fixed-enum clients in favor of extensibility.
Over the last 30 days Productboard shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “EntityType moves from fixed enum to workspace-specific open string”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Productboard focuses on product management, api extensibility and roadmap tooling.
Over the last 30 days Productboard has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full Productboard trajectory → · Compare Reclaim.ai vs Productboard →
10. Float · velocity 6.3
Float adds AI experience profiles and multi-currency rate cards — expanding from scheduling into project economics.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Smart insights: know who’s done this work before, with AI experience profiles”.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Float focuses on resource management, scheduling and ai matching.
Float and Reclaim.ai have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
11. My Hours · velocity 6.3
My Hours ships MCP support for Claude — time logging and timesheet retrieval are now conversational operations.
Over the last 30 days My Hours shipped 1 meaningful update vs Reclaim.ai's 0, most recently “My Hours MCP for Claude”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, My Hours focuses on time tracking, mcp and ai assistants.
Over the last 30 days My Hours has been shipping faster than Reclaim.ai — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.
Full My Hours trajectory → · Compare Reclaim.ai vs My Hours →
12. Asana · velocity 6.3
Asana embeds AI into Slack threads and closes the rich-text gap with Notion.
Its velocity score of 6.3/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “🎉 @mention Asana in Slack to create tasks and get answers”.
Where Reclaim.ai leans on calendar scheduling, slack and out of office, Asana focuses on project management, ai integration and enterprise compliance.
Asana and Reclaim.ai have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.
Frequently asked questions
What are the best alternatives to Reclaim.ai?
The top Reclaim.ai alternatives we currently track in project management tools are Tracecat, SmartSuite, Rize, Aha!, Fibery, ranked by recent ship velocity.
How is this list of Reclaim.ai alternatives ranked?
Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.
Can I compare Reclaim.ai directly with one of these alternatives?
Yes — every card has a "Compare with Reclaim.ai" link to a side-by-side /compare page.