← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Rocket.Chat vs Shortwave

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Rocket.Chat and Shortwave — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Rocket.Chat vs Shortwave: at a glance

FeatureRocket.ChatShortwave
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score6.30.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesteam-chat, voice-calling, screen-sharing, self-hostedai-email, agentic-workflows, mcp, automation
Last editorial update1d ago1mo ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Rocket.Chat?

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

Read the full Rocket.Chat trajectory →

What is Shortwave?

Shortwave keeps folding autonomy into the inbox, one AI action at a time.

Shortwave has moved decisively from an AI-assisted email client to an inbox that acts on the user's behalf. The assistant reads, drafts, organizes, and — via the Tasklet integration — triggers automated workflows across thousands of apps, with its work surfaced inside Shortwave rather than buried in Gmail. Every release since late 2024 has pushed more of the email workflow out of the user's hands and into the model's.

Read the full Shortwave trajectory →

Rocket.Chat vs Shortwave: editorial side-by-side

Rocket.Chat logo6.3

Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.

◆ Current state

The 8.8 candidate line is winding down. rc.2 is a bare Meteor version bump with no user-visible change, following rc.1 which promoted Voice Call Screen Sharing to stable and turned on the in-room call interface for every call, screen sharing available or not, alongside repairs to a message list that could quietly load a whole room's history in the background. The release that still defines the line is rc.0: LDAP and SAML deprecated on non-Premium workspaces with 9.0.0 named as the cutoff, forced end-to-end encryption for new private rooms, classification banners for ABAC-managed rooms, and the apps-engine default runtime moved from Deno to Node.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run at once and point in different directions. The calling stack keeps maturing on its own — voice, then screen sharing, now a consistent in-room surface for both — which is Rocket.Chat absorbing functions its users would otherwise reach for a separate tool to get. Against that, the 9.0 licence requirement for LDAP and SAML sorts the install base: regulated and government deployments that will pay, and unlicensed self-hosted workspaces that were there for the absence of a per-seat bill. The rc train itself has settled into a familiar shape, one substantive rc.0 followed by bumps and fixes.

◆ Prediction

Expect 8.8 to go final once the message-list fixes settle, with the LDAP and SAML licence requirement, not any calling feature, as the story of 9.0. The open question is whether the Deno-to-Node runtime switch surfaces app compatibility reports before then.

S0.0

Shortwave keeps folding autonomy into the inbox, one AI action at a time.

◆ Current state

Shortwave has moved decisively from an AI-assisted email client to an inbox that acts on the user's behalf. The assistant reads, drafts, organizes, and — via the Tasklet integration — triggers automated workflows across thousands of apps, with its work surfaced inside Shortwave rather than buried in Gmail. Every release since late 2024 has pushed more of the email workflow out of the user's hands and into the model's.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is a steadily widening action surface: MCP connectors to external tools, AI Memories, voice, and now trigger-based automation all frame email as an agent runtime rather than a reading pane. Model choices track the frontier closely — Claude 3.7 to Sonnet 4 to the 4.6 family — keeping capability tied to whatever the best available model can do. The team ships broadly across web, desktop, iOS, and Android each cycle.

◆ Prediction

The next moves most likely deepen autonomous execution — more trigger types and tighter loops where the assistant acts with less confirmation — rather than adding new surface features.

Alternatives to Rocket.Chat and Shortwave

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Rocket.Chat or Shortwave.

See all Rocket.Chat alternatives → · See all Shortwave alternatives →

Recent activity from Rocket.Chat and Shortwave

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.2: Meteor version bump only
  2. 4d agoRocket.ChatScreen sharing goes stable; in-room call UI for every call
  3. 12d agoRocket.Chat8.8.0-rc.0: LDAP/SAML go Premium in 9.0, forced private-room E2EE
  4. 26d agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.6: Meteor version bump only
  5. 29d agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.5: Meteor version bump only
  6. 1mo agoRocket.Chat8.7.0-rc.4: audio attachments become seekable again
  7. 6mo agoShortwaveUpgraded to Claude Sonnet & Opus 4.6
  8. 7mo agoShortwaveFully automate your email with Tasklet 🔗
  9. 11mo agoShortwaveEnhanced AI performance & collaboration
  10. 1y agoShortwaveIntegrate the AI with all your apps 🔌
  11. 1y agoShortwaveTalk to your inbox 🎙️
  12. 1y agoShortwaveOrganize your inbox with AI ✨

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Rocket.Chat and Shortwave?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Rocket.Chat better than Shortwave?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Rocket.Chat?

Top Rocket.Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rocket.Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rocketchat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Shortwave?

Top Shortwave alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Shortwave alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/shortwave for the full list with editorial commentary on each.