← Back to home
Comparison · Support

Plain vs Request Tracker

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Plain and Request Tracker — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Plain vs Request Tracker: at a glance

FeaturePlainRequest Tracker
SectorSupportSupport
Velocity score8.80.0
Sparks · 30d10
Top themescustomer-support, ai-agents, mcp, agent-governanceticketing, security-releases, multi-branch, cve
Last editorial update14d ago6d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Plain?

Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.

Plain's changelog is dated entries with no titles, and nearly all of it concerns two AI surfaces: Ari, the customer-facing responder, and Sidekick, the internal agent. Sidekick spent July gaining reach — its own full-page home, reusable workspace skills, and connection to arbitrary MCP servers. The newest release turns to Ari and adds what was missing around it: a way to test it before customers see it, provenance behind each answer, configurable tone, and explicit escalation rules.

Read the full Plain trajectory →

What is Request Tracker?

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

Read the full Request Tracker trajectory →

Plain vs Request Tracker: editorial side-by-side

P
Plain
SUPPORT
8.8

Plain built an autonomous support agent, and has now built the controls to trust it.

◆ Current state

Plain's changelog is dated entries with no titles, and nearly all of it concerns two AI surfaces: Ari, the customer-facing responder, and Sidekick, the internal agent. Sidekick spent July gaining reach — its own full-page home, reusable workspace skills, and connection to arbitrary MCP servers. The newest release turns to Ari and adds what was missing around it: a way to test it before customers see it, provenance behind each answer, configurable tone, and explicit escalation rules.

◆ Where it's heading

The sequence reads as capability first, then governance. Plain rebuilt Ari into an agentic first responder, opened Sidekick to any MCP server, and let teams write skills the whole workspace shares — all of which widen what the agents can do and reach. The current release closes the loop the other way, making that autonomy inspectable and bounded before it is switched on. That is the order support-AI vendors have to complete in: teams will not put an agent in front of customers on capability claims alone.

◆ Prediction

With testing and provenance in place, the next step is likely measurement — resolution and escalation rates per skill, or per-answer quality review feeding back into the skills teams write. The entries are short summaries linking off-site, so per-release depth is limited.

R0.0

Request Tracker maintains three branches in lockstep, and security is what sets the release calendar.

◆ Current state

Best Practical ships RT across three concurrent branches, 4.4, 5.0 and 6.0, and coordinates security releases across all of them on the same day. The most recent pair, 5.0.10 and 6.0.3, both landed on 2026-05-20 carrying the same fixes: a privilege escalation and credential disclosure through the REST 2.0 user collection endpoint (CVE-2026-44231), SQL injection via the entry_aggregator parameter in JSON search (CVE-2026-41075), and an LDAP authentication bypass. Feature work rides along on the 6.0 branch, while 5.0 and 4.4 receive security fixes and little else.

◆ Where it's heading

The branch structure is consolidating. RT 4.4 reached its last planned release at 4.4.9 in October 2025, with users pointed at 5 or 6, and 6.0 is where features now land: dashboard saved searches gained pagination and sorting, statuses take colors from lifecycle configuration, custom fields display multi-column by default, and keyboard menu navigation improved. The 5.0 line still gets real work but of a narrower kind, such as the inline CSS handling in ticket history that shipped with 5.0.10. Expect the same-day multi-branch security release to remain the pattern for as long as two branches are supported.

◆ Prediction

The next release is most likely another coordinated security pair on 5.0 and 6.0, with feature work continuing to accumulate only on 6.0.

Alternatives to Plain and Request Tracker

Other Support products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Plain or Request Tracker.

See all Plain alternatives → · See all Request Tracker alternatives →

Recent activity from Plain and Request Tracker

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 15d agoPlainTest Ari before customers see it, with per-answer proof
  2. 29d agoPlainImport past conversations from any tool, no built-in importer
  3. 1mo agoPlainSidekick connects to any MCP server
  4. 1mo agoPlainSidekick gains reusable, workspace-shared skills
  5. 1mo agoPlainShare published workflows by link
  6. 1mo agoPlainSidekick gets its own full-page home and tool controls
  7. 3mo agoRequest TrackerSecurity release fixes REST 2.0 credential disclosure and SQL injection
  8. 3mo agoRequest TrackerSame security fixes as 5.0.10, plus dashboard and accessibility work
  9. 10mo agoRequest TrackerCalendar view for saved searches and memory management work
  10. 10mo agoRequest TrackerCSV injection fix in TSV export, with assorted updates
  11. 10mo agoRequest TrackerFinal RT 4.4 release closes the branch with one security fix
  12. 1y agoRequest TrackerRelease exists mainly to support RTIR 6.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Plain and Request Tracker?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Plain is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Plain better than Request Tracker?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Plain is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 8.8 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Support products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Plain?

Top Plain alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Plain alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/plain for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Request Tracker?

Top Request Tracker alternatives in Support are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Request Tracker alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/request-tracker for the full list with editorial commentary on each.