← Back to home
Comparison · Design

Horizon EDA vs Octopus.do

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Horizon EDA and Octopus.do — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Horizon EDA vs Octopus.do: at a glance

FeatureHorizon EDAOctopus.do
SectorDesignDesign
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d01
Top themeseda, pcb-design, editor-ergonomics, slow-cadencesitemap, ux-planning, mcp, ai-integration
Last editorial update1mo ago16h ago
WebsiteVisit →

What is Horizon EDA?

Horizon EDA ships one feature release a year and spends the rest fixing what it broke.

Horizon EDA runs a slow, deliberate cadence: roughly one named feature release per year — Kepler in 2023, Luna in 2024, Mirage in 2025 — followed by two bugfix releases in the same series. The 2.7 series added pick-and-place export save/load, polygon pad rendering performance, project pool cache updates from the editors, and parameter fixing in the package editor. Its two patch releases were crash fixes and export correctness, mostly around silkscreen and PDF output.

Read the full Horizon EDA trajectory →

What is Octopus.do?

Octopus.do integrates with Claude and ChatGPT via MCP, turning sitemaps into live AI-editable workspace.

Octopus.do is a sitemap and content-planning tool used by UX designers and content strategists. Its most directional move in recent months is an official Claude and ChatGPT integration with an underlying MCP server: you can now ask an AI assistant to build or edit a sitemap directly inside your Octopus account. This follows a Figma plugin that generates high-fidelity prototypes from sitemaps, reinforcing Octopus as a connective layer between planning and execution tooling. Google Analytics integration (September 2026) brings live page-view data into the planning canvas.

Read the full Octopus.do trajectory →

Horizon EDA vs Octopus.do: editorial side-by-side

H0.0

Horizon EDA ships one feature release a year and spends the rest fixing what it broke.

◆ Current state

Horizon EDA runs a slow, deliberate cadence: roughly one named feature release per year — Kepler in 2023, Luna in 2024, Mirage in 2025 — followed by two bugfix releases in the same series. The 2.7 series added pick-and-place export save/load, polygon pad rendering performance, project pool cache updates from the editors, and parameter fixing in the package editor. Its two patch releases were crash fixes and export correctness, mostly around silkscreen and PDF output.

◆ Where it's heading

The feature work tracks a single theme across all three named releases: making the editors forgiving. Undo and redo that never forgets, undo/redo of selection, sticky selection and configurable selection modifiers arrived in 2.5 and 2.6; 2.7 pushed into export workflows and rendering speed. The bugfix pattern is consistent too — most patches land in the board editor, which is where the complexity lives.

◆ Prediction

On the established cadence a 2.8 feature release is due, and the recent bugfix concentration suggests export and silkscreen handling get attention in it.

O6.3

Octopus.do integrates with Claude and ChatGPT via MCP, turning sitemaps into live AI-editable workspace.

◆ Current state

Octopus.do is a sitemap and content-planning tool used by UX designers and content strategists. Its most directional move in recent months is an official Claude and ChatGPT integration with an underlying MCP server: you can now ask an AI assistant to build or edit a sitemap directly inside your Octopus account. This follows a Figma plugin that generates high-fidelity prototypes from sitemaps, reinforcing Octopus as a connective layer between planning and execution tooling. Google Analytics integration (September 2026) brings live page-view data into the planning canvas.

◆ Where it's heading

Octopus is positioning itself as the structured planning layer that AI agents, designers, and content writers all touch. The MCP server + Claude/ChatGPT apps extend the tool from human-only to agent-addressable; the Figma export closes the gap between planning and visual design; Google Analytics closes the gap between planning and live performance data. The new Copywriter project role suggests the team is investing in team-scale workflows where different contributors (copywriters, designers, SEO editors) need scoped access.

◆ Prediction

Octopus will expand the AI surface—likely adding agent-driven SEO tag generation, AI-assisted sitemap restructuring based on analytics data, or deeper Figma round-trip editing. The public REST API and MCP server hint at a platform play: Octopus as structured sitemap infrastructure that third-party tools and agents can read and write.

Alternatives to Horizon EDA and Octopus.do

Other Design products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Horizon EDA or Octopus.do.

See all Horizon EDA alternatives → · See all Octopus.do alternatives →

Recent activity from Horizon EDA and Octopus.do

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoOctopus.doGoogle Analytics on your sitemap
  2. 6d agoOctopus.doSave any project as a template
  3. 28d agoOctopus.doOctopus in ChatGPT and Claude
  4. 3mo agoOctopus.doCopywriter role in team projects
  5. 3mo agoOctopus.doA major update to Octopus editor
  6. 4mo agoOctopus.doOctopus to Figma Plugin Update
  7. 9mo agoHorizon EDASecond 2.7 bugfix release: silkscreen arcs and PDF export
  8. 0y agoHorizon EDAFirst 2.7 bugfix release: smashed silkscreen text crash
  9. 1y agoHorizon EDAPick-and-place export presets and faster polygon pad rendering
  10. 2y agoHorizon EDAUser layers, undo/redo of selection, meson build
  11. 3y agoHorizon EDABlind and buried vias, undo/redo that never forgets

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Horizon EDA and Octopus.do?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Octopus.do is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Horizon EDA better than Octopus.do?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Octopus.do is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Design products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Horizon EDA?

Top Horizon EDA alternatives in Design are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Horizon EDA alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/horizon-eda for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Octopus.do?

Top Octopus.do alternatives in Design are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Octopus.do alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/octopus-do for the full list with editorial commentary on each.