tern.rbmi
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of gwasvcf and protr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
gwasvcf has stopped adding features and now just keeps proxy matching from failing.
gwasvcf reads and queries GWAS summary statistics stored as VCF, with LD proxy lookup as its most-used entry point. Every release in the visible window is a fix, and all but one land in or around proxy_match(). The last functional addition was gwasvcf_to_summaryset() in 0.1.2, which hands data to gwasglue2 rather than doing new work here.
protr's feature set is finished; the work now is surviving Bioconductor's churn.
protr generates numerical descriptors from protein sequences for machine learning, plus alignment-based similarity between sequences. The descriptor functions have been stable for years. Recent releases divide cleanly into two kinds: extending the similarity computations to work under memory constraints, and absorbing the Bioconductor split that moved pairwise alignment out of Biostrings into pwalign.
gwasvcf reads and queries GWAS summary statistics stored as VCF, with LD proxy lookup as its most-used entry point. Every release in the visible window is a fix, and all but one land in or around proxy_match(). The last functional addition was gwasvcf_to_summaryset() in 0.1.2, which hands data to gwasglue2 rather than doing new work here.
The package is in custodial maintenance inside the MRC IEU OpenGWAS stack, and its releases are reactive: each one answers a specific user-reported failure, credited to the reporter. The 0.1.6 pattern is telling — rather than replace the proxy VCF construction, it keeps the original path and adds a fallback only for inputs that fail, so existing results are left bit-for-bit unchanged.
Expect further narrow robustness fixes to proxy_match() driven by user-reported VCF shapes; nothing in the entries suggests new analysis capability is being built here rather than in gwasglue2.
protr generates numerical descriptors from protein sequences for machine learning, plus alignment-based similarity between sequences. The descriptor functions have been stable for years. Recent releases divide cleanly into two kinds: extending the similarity computations to work under memory constraints, and absorbing the Bioconductor split that moved pairwise alignment out of Biostrings into pwalign.
The similarity side is where the remaining engineering goes, and it follows a consistent pattern — whatever parSeqSim() gained, crossSetSim() eventually gets. Batching, verbose progress and a disk-backed variant all arrived for the single-set case first and were mirrored for the cross-set case in 1.7-1. That is a maintainer closing feature-parity gaps rather than opening new directions, and the two most recent releases contain no user-facing change at all.
Expect the next release to react to another Bioconductor or R CMD check change, which accounts for three of the last four. The similarity functions now have parity, so there is no obvious internal backlog left.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either gwasvcf or protr.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
An MMRM tabulation package that has published nothing since its 2024 CRAN releases.
A single-purpose ggplot2 inset tool, refining the same three arguments.
An R symbolic-maths binding whose changelog is really the C++ core's release notes.
gtfstools stopped guarding its own object model and started accepting everyone else's.
The glue package that makes R carry units and uncertainty through the same calculation.
See all gwasvcf alternatives → · See all protr alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. gwasvcf and protr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. gwasvcf and protr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top gwasvcf alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "gwasvcf alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gwasvcf for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top protr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "protr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/protr-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.