tidyr
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
Comparison · Analytics
Fulcrum vs modeltime
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and modeltime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Fulcrum vs modeltime: at a glance
| Feature | Fulcrum | modeltime |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | field-data-collection, esri-arcgis, offline-maps, mobile-releases | forecasting, conformal-prediction, tidymodels, parallelism |
| Last editorial update | 17h ago | 1h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Fulcrum?
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
What is modeltime?
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.
Fulcrum vs modeltime: editorial side-by-side
Fulcrum
6.3ANALYTICS
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
◆ Current state
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
◆ Where it's heading
One platform bet runs through everything: Esri as the single map engine, with Google's satellite, hybrid, and street imagery retained as basemap options so the migration costs users imagery choice, not capability. The current release cadence is stabilization work paying down that migration rather than new ground.
◆ Prediction
Expect map and location fixes to keep dominating releases through the September 1 cutover, with the Esri-only capabilities already listed — snapping, ArcGIS Feature Service connectivity, offline basemaps — becoming the default surface rather than the alternative one.
modeltime
0.0ANALYTICS
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
◆ Current state
modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc runs from uncertainty quantification to execution. Conformal intervals arrived first and were then threaded through nested fitting, refitting and the printed forecast tables so users can see which confidence method produced an interval. The later work moves down a layer to how forecasts are computed — a portable future backend replacing foreach tuning — rather than what they express.
◆ Prediction
With only an xgboost compatibility fix since the 1.3.2 feature release, the entries do not support a confident prediction about what comes next beyond continued dependency maintenance.
Alternatives to Fulcrum and modeltime
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or modeltime.
performance
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
cmdstanpy
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all modeltime alternatives →
Recent activity from Fulcrum and modeltime
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 23h agoFulcrumiOS fix for slow location resolution blocking saves
- 5d agoFulcrumMap engine updated to the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl
- 7d agoFulcrumAndroid stability fixes for ArcGIS location and signatures
- 7d agoFulcrumiOS basemap loading and map-centering fixes
- 8d agoFulcrumArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 lands; ONNX inference support removed
- 8d agoFulcrumOffline ArcGIS layers keep custom symbols and labels
- 7mo agomodeltimeRobustness to xgboost version changes
- 11mo agomodeltimefuture parallel backend, maape() metric and ADAM tuning helpers
- 2y agomodeltimeConformal intervals reach the nested forecasting workflow
- 2y agomodeltimeConformal prediction intervals introduced
- 3y agomodeltimeFixes the Smooth es() model
- 3y agomodeltimeFixes failing developer-tools tests
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fulcrum and modeltime?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Fulcrum better than modeltime?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?
Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to modeltime?
Top modeltime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.