← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

performance vs modeltime

A side-by-side editorial comparison of performance and modeltime — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-language

performance vs modeltime: at a glance

Featureperformancemodeltime
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-language, model-diagnostics, bayesian, easystatsforecasting, conformal-prediction, tidymodels, parallelism
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is performance?

performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.

performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.

Read the full performance trajectory →

What is modeltime?

modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.

modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.

Read the full modeltime trajectory →

performance vs modeltime: editorial side-by-side

P
performance
ANALYTICS
0.0

performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.

◆ Current state

performance is at 0.17.1, which added check_priors() for prior predictive checks on Bayesian models and gave check_overdispersion(), check_model() and check_predictions() arguments to control residual type and plot range. The releases before it are a similar mix: a -2LL criterion column in test_likelihoodratio(), Bayesian predictive checks routed through modelbased, and in 0.16.0 a set of breaking renames including RMSA to the correct RMSR.

◆ Where it's heading

Two consistent habits. Diagnostics keep gaining arguments to narrow what is examined — ppc_range, x_limits, maximum_dots, show_ci — which reads as a package being used on models large and awkward enough that the defaults stopped working. And simulated residuals via DHARMa keep displacing standard ones as the basis for the checks themselves.

◆ Prediction

With check_priors() newly added and Bayesian predictive checks now routed through modelbased, the next release most likely extends the Bayesian diagnostic set rather than reworking the frequentist checks.

M
modeltime
ANALYTICS
0.0

modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.

◆ Current state

modeltime is at 1.3.3, a single change making the package robust to xgboost version shifts. The feature weight sits in 1.3.2, which added a future-based parallel backend, the maape() accuracy metric and dials helpers for ADAM engine tuning, and further back in the 1.2.8 and 1.3.0 pair that introduced conformal prediction intervals and then carried them through the nested forecasting workflow.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from uncertainty quantification to execution. Conformal intervals arrived first and were then threaded through nested fitting, refitting and the printed forecast tables so users can see which confidence method produced an interval. The later work moves down a layer to how forecasts are computed — a portable future backend replacing foreach tuning — rather than what they express.

◆ Prediction

With only an xgboost compatibility fix since the 1.3.2 feature release, the entries do not support a confident prediction about what comes next beyond continued dependency maintenance.

Alternatives to performance and modeltime

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either performance or modeltime.

See all performance alternatives → · See all modeltime alternatives →

Recent activity from performance and modeltime

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoperformancecheck_priors() added; overdispersion plots use simulated residuals
  2. 2mo agoperformance-2LL criterion column and unified Bayesian predictive checks
  3. 6mo agoperformanceBreaking renames plus point-count and CI controls in check_model()
  4. 7mo agomodeltimeRobustness to xgboost version changes
  5. 8mo agoperformancecheck_autocorrelation() methods for DHARMa objects
  6. 10mo agoperformanceFixes CRAN checks after an rstanarm update
  7. 11mo agoperformancetinytable output format in display()
  8. 11mo agomodeltimefuture parallel backend, maape() metric and ADAM tuning helpers
  9. 2y agomodeltimeConformal intervals reach the nested forecasting workflow
  10. 2y agomodeltimeConformal prediction intervals introduced
  11. 3y agomodeltimeFixes the Smooth es() model
  12. 3y agomodeltimeFixes failing developer-tools tests

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between performance and modeltime?

Both compete on the same themes — r-language — within Analytics. performance and modeltime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is performance better than modeltime?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. performance and modeltime are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to performance?

Top performance alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "performance alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/easystats-performance for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to modeltime?

Top modeltime alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "modeltime alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/modeltime for the full list with editorial commentary on each.