modeltime
modeltime built conformal intervals in, then went quiet on features.
Comparison · Analytics
Fulcrum vs tidyr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fulcrum and tidyr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Fulcrum vs tidyr: at a glance
| Feature | Fulcrum | tidyr |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | Analytics | Analytics |
| Velocity score | 6.3 | 0.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 0 | 0 |
| Top themes | field-data-collection, esri-arcgis, offline-maps, mobile-releases | tidyverse, data-reshaping, pivoting, api-design |
| Last editorial update | 17h ago | 1h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Fulcrum?
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
What is tidyr?
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
Fulcrum vs tidyr: editorial side-by-side
Fulcrum
6.3ANALYTICS
Fulcrum is consolidating on Esri, with Google Maps gone September 1
◆ Current state
The mapping stack is the whole story right now: ArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 on iOS, the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl on web, and a hard cutover date after which any organization still defaulting to Google Maps is switched to Esri automatically. The mobile releases in this window are almost entirely map and location fixes — basemap loading, offline symbol styling, location resolution that blocked saves. On-device inference quietly changed format, dropping ONNX.
◆ Where it's heading
One platform bet runs through everything: Esri as the single map engine, with Google's satellite, hybrid, and street imagery retained as basemap options so the migration costs users imagery choice, not capability. The current release cadence is stabilization work paying down that migration rather than new ground.
◆ Prediction
Expect map and location fixes to keep dominating releases through the September 1 cutover, with the Esri-only capabilities already listed — snapping, ArcGIS Feature Service connectivity, offline basemaps — becoming the default surface rather than the alternative one.
tidyr
0.0ANALYTICS
tidyr replaced separate() with a family that says what it does.
◆ Current state
tidyr is at 1.3.2, a collection of argument additions — fill() gains .by, expand_grid() gains .vary — and better error messages around unchop() and pivot_wider_spec(). The structural work is 1.3.0, which introduced separate_wider_delim(), separate_wider_position(), separate_wider_regex(), separate_longer_delim() and separate_longer_position() as thorough replacements for separate(), extract() and separate_rows().
◆ Where it's heading
Two habits define this window. Verbs are being split into explicitly named variants rather than overloaded with arguments, which is what the separate_* family does to separate(). And .by is spreading as the standard way to express grouping inline — nest(.by=) in 1.3.0, fill(.by=) in 1.3.2 — pulling users away from wrapping calls in group_by().
◆ Prediction
Given that .by has now reached fill() and nest(), the next release most likely extends the same argument to further verbs rather than reworking another function family.
Alternatives to Fulcrum and tidyr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fulcrum or tidyr.
performance
performance keeps adding ways to check a model you have already fitted.
cmdstanpy
CmdStanPy is clearing deprecations ahead of a 2.0 it keeps announcing.
dowhy
DoWhy adds one estimation method a year and keeps its identification edge.
OpenHouse
OpenHouse is hardening the seams where table policies and jobs quietly fail.
silx
silx 3.0 moved its default Qt binding to PySide6 — a migration for everyone embedding it.
See all Fulcrum alternatives → · See all tidyr alternatives →
Recent activity from Fulcrum and tidyr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 23h agoFulcrumiOS fix for slow location resolution blocking saves
- 5d agoFulcrumMap engine updated to the latest ArcGIS and deck.gl
- 7d agoFulcrumAndroid stability fixes for ArcGIS location and signatures
- 7d agoFulcrumiOS basemap loading and map-centering fixes
- 8d agoFulcrumArcGIS SDK 300.0.0 lands; ONNX inference support removed
- 8d agoFulcrumOffline ArcGIS layers keep custom symbols and labels
- 7mo agotidyrfill() gains .by; expand_grid() gains .vary
- 2y agotidyrpivot_wider duplicate message uses modern syntax
- 3y agotidyrseparate_wider_* family supersedes separate() and extract()
- 3y agotidyrHot patch for R CMD check failures
- 4y agotidyrpivot_wider() gains names_expand, id_expand and unused_fn
- 4y agotidyrLarge speedups to unchop(), unnest() and expand_grid()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fulcrum and tidyr?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Fulcrum better than tidyr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fulcrum is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Fulcrum?
Top Fulcrum alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fulcrum alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fulcrum for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to tidyr?
Top tidyr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tidyr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tidyr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.