metR
A meteorology ggplot2 extension where the netCDF reader became the main event
Comparison · Infra & APIs
driveR vs sps
A side-by-side editorial comparison of driveR and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
driveR vs sps: at a glance
What is driveR?
A cancer driver prioritization package that ships rarely and mostly to stay installable
driveR prioritizes cancer driver genes from somatic variant and copy number data, combining coding impact scores, noncoding impact, copy number alteration scores and hotspot annotations into a multi-task learning classification model. Version 0.5.0 added gene-level SCNA data frames as an accepted input to create_features_df(), with an example table shipped alongside, widening the entry point beyond the segment-level format. The same release moved org.Hs.eg.db and both hg19 and hg38 TxDb annotation packages from Imports to Suggests under new CRAN policy, with dependent functions now raising an error when they are absent rather than silently degrading.
What is sps?
sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.
The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.
driveR vs sps: editorial side-by-side
driveR
0.0INFRA · APIS
A cancer driver prioritization package that ships rarely and mostly to stay installable
◆ Current state
driveR prioritizes cancer driver genes from somatic variant and copy number data, combining coding impact scores, noncoding impact, copy number alteration scores and hotspot annotations into a multi-task learning classification model. Version 0.5.0 added gene-level SCNA data frames as an accepted input to create_features_df(), with an example table shipped alongside, widening the entry point beyond the segment-level format. The same release moved org.Hs.eg.db and both hg19 and hg38 TxDb annotation packages from Imports to Suggests under new CRAN policy, with dependent functions now raising an error when they are absent rather than silently degrading.
◆ Where it's heading
Releases are infrequent and split cleanly between capability and correction. GRCh38 support arrived in 0.4.0 and cancer-type-specific thresholds were refreshed in 0.3.0, while the 0.2.x pair fixed scoring errors serious enough to require retraining: a column name mismatch meant the SCNA score was not being computed at all, and MCR table coordinates needed converting from hg18 to hg19. Both times the bundled classification model and thresholds were rebuilt as a consequence. Since 0.4.0 the changes have been input handling and packaging rather than method.
◆ Prediction
The move of the annotation databases to Suggests suggests a leaner install is the current priority; the entries give no indication of planned model or scoring changes.
sps
2.5INFRA · APIS
sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.
◆ Current state
The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.
◆ Where it's heading
Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.
◆ Prediction
Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.
Alternatives to driveR and sps
Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either driveR or sps.
IsoriX
An isotope geolocation package still recovering from the r-spatial retirement
fdacluster
Functional data clustering grew from one algorithm into a comparable suite
profoc
A forecast combination package that spun its profiler out into its own project
adjustedCurves
A survival curve package spending release after release correcting its own estimates
mize
A numerical optimization toolkit that has been feature-complete and quiet since 2017
Recent activity from driveR and sps
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
- 7mo agodriveRGene-level copy number input accepted, annotation packages made optional
- 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
- 11mo agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
- 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
- 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
- 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes
- 3y agodriveRCRAN documentation error fixed
- 4y agodriveRGRCh38 genome build supported
- 4y agodriveRCancer-type-specific thresholds updated
- 5y agodriveRMCR coordinates converted to hg19 and the model retrained
- 5y agodriveRCopy number score was never being computed, model rebuilt
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between driveR and sps?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is driveR better than sps?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to driveR?
Top driveR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "driveR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/driver for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to sps?
Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.