← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

metR vs sps

A side-by-side editorial comparison of metR and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

metR vs sps: at a glance

FeaturemetRsps
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmeteorology, ggplot2, r-package, netcdfr-package, survey-sampling, sequential-poisson, performance
Last editorial update48m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is metR?

A meteorology ggplot2 extension where the netCDF reader became the main event

metR supplies meteorological and oceanographic tools for R: contour and streamline geoms, EOF decomposition, wave fitting, and ReadNetCDF() for getting gridded data in. Development has concentrated heavily on that reader. Version 0.18.0 added subsetting by dimension index, so the first or last ten timesteps can be read without knowing how many exist; 0.18.1 moved time parsing to the CFtime package; 0.18.2 added cdo operations through rcdo and reading across multiple files in parallel, and fixed a subsetting bug where nearest-gridpoint matching could return data outside the requested range entirely.

Read the full metR trajectory →

What is sps?

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

Read the full sps trajectory →

metR vs sps: editorial side-by-side

M
metR
INFRA · APIS
0.0

A meteorology ggplot2 extension where the netCDF reader became the main event

◆ Current state

metR supplies meteorological and oceanographic tools for R: contour and streamline geoms, EOF decomposition, wave fitting, and ReadNetCDF() for getting gridded data in. Development has concentrated heavily on that reader. Version 0.18.0 added subsetting by dimension index, so the first or last ten timesteps can be read without knowing how many exist; 0.18.1 moved time parsing to the CFtime package; 0.18.2 added cdo operations through rcdo and reading across multiple files in parallel, and fixed a subsetting bug where nearest-gridpoint matching could return data outside the requested range entirely.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run through the releases. The first is tracking ggplot2, absorbing the linewidth aesthetic, the trans to transform rename and guide compatibility as each landed upstream. The second is narrowing scope while deepening the data path: GetSMNData() was made defunct as too specific for a general package, raster and gdal dependencies were removed, and the udunits2 dependency was dropped when it was orphaned, initially replaced by a homebrewed date parser and eventually by CFtime. The result is a package steadily shedding its own code in favour of specialised upstream libraries.

◆ Prediction

Expect further ReadNetCDF() work, since it has received features in four of the last five releases and the rcdo integration opens a large surface of operations to expose.

S
sps
INFRA · APIS
2.5

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

◆ Current state

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.

Alternatives to metR and sps

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either metR or sps.

See all metR alternatives → · See all sps alternatives →

Recent activity from metR and sps

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
  2. 7mo agometRSubset notation fix in the netCDF reader
  3. 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
  4. 11mo agometRcdo operations, parallel multi-file reads, and a subsetting correctness fix
  5. 11mo agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
  6. 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
  7. 1y agometRnetCDF time parsing handed to the CFtime package
  8. 1y agometRnetCDF subsetting by dimension index
  9. 1y agometRLongitude scales pass the transform argument correctly
  10. 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
  11. 1y agometREOF rotation takes a function, and scope narrows
  12. 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between metR and sps?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is metR better than sps?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to metR?

Top metR alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "metR alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/metr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sps?

Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.