← Back to home
Comparison · Infra & APIs

fdacluster vs sps

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fdacluster and sps — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fdacluster vs sps: at a glance

Featurefdaclustersps
SectorInfra & APIsInfra & APIs
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesfunctional-data-analysis, clustering, r-package, rcppr-package, survey-sampling, sequential-poisson, performance
Last editorial update47m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fdacluster?

Functional data clustering grew from one algorithm into a comparable suite

fdacluster clusters functional data while separating amplitude from phase variation, aligning curves as part of the clustering rather than before it. The algorithm set covers k-means, hierarchical clustering and DBSCAN, all producing a common caps result object so runs can be compared directly. Version 0.4.0 tightened the interface with is_domain_interval and transformation arguments describing the input data, added compatibility checking between incompatible option combinations, and split the L2 and normalized L2 distances into separate C++ classes to enforce that plain L2 cannot be combined with dilation or affine warping it is not invariant to.

Read the full fdacluster trajectory →

What is sps?

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

Read the full sps trajectory →

fdacluster vs sps: editorial side-by-side

F
fdacluster
INFRA · APIS
0.0

Functional data clustering grew from one algorithm into a comparable suite

◆ Current state

fdacluster clusters functional data while separating amplitude from phase variation, aligning curves as part of the clustering rather than before it. The algorithm set covers k-means, hierarchical clustering and DBSCAN, all producing a common caps result object so runs can be compared directly. Version 0.4.0 tightened the interface with is_domain_interval and transformation arguments describing the input data, added compatibility checking between incompatible option combinations, and split the L2 and normalized L2 distances into separate C++ classes to enforce that plain L2 cannot be combined with dilation or affine warping it is not invariant to.

◆ Where it's heading

The trajectory runs from method implementation toward guardrails and portability. Early releases added capability; recent ones prevent misuse and reduce weight - dplyr, forcats, tidyr and purrr removed in 0.4.0, furrr swapped for future.apply - while 0.4.2 is entirely C++ correctness, replacing Armadillo's whole-object finiteness check with scalar std::isfinite and fixing an integer overflow in linear index computation that broke large datasets. Cadence is roughly one release a year.

◆ Prediction

Given that the last two releases were dependency reduction and numerical correctness rather than method work, expect the next to continue in that vein unless a new clustering algorithm is contributed.

S
sps
INFRA · APIS
2.5

sps keeps sanding down sequential Poisson sampling rather than adding to it.

◆ Current state

The package implements sequential Poisson sampling for survey design, covering inclusion probabilities, proportional allocation, replicate weights, and take-all strata. Recent releases are small and tightly scoped: a divisor method helper, an iterator that draws a sample one unit at a time, automatic selection of the replicate-weight parameter, and repeated performance work on inclusion probability calculation.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is consolidation rather than expansion. Most releases either speed up an existing routine or remove a decision the user previously had to make by hand, such as picking the smallest parameter that keeps replicate weights non-negative. Documentation and tooling get comparable attention to the algorithms, with a dedicated vignette on inclusion probabilities and a recent switch of test and documentation infrastructure. The API surface has been essentially stable across the window.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued small ergonomic and performance releases against the existing function set rather than new sampling designs, which is the pattern every release in this window follows.

Alternatives to fdacluster and sps

Other Infra & APIs products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fdacluster or sps.

See all fdacluster alternatives → · See all sps alternatives →

Recent activity from fdacluster and sps

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agospsDocumentation polish; switches to tinytest and litedown
  2. 7mo agofdaclusterInteger overflow fixed for large datasets, C++ finiteness checks corrected
  3. 9mo agospsFixes extra argument handling in sps_iterator()
  4. 11mo agospsAdds divisor_method() and a one-unit-at-a-time sampling iterator
  5. 1y agospsAdds an inclusion-probability vignette and faster partial sorting
  6. 1y agospsAutomatic tau selection for replicate weights
  7. 1y agofdaclusterParallel worker setup and an acronym correction
  8. 1y agofdaclusterInput description arguments and enforced distance-warping compatibility
  9. 2y agospsAdds becomes_ta() for take-all stratum sample sizes
  10. 3y agofdaclusterMedian centroids and centroids defined on unioned grids
  11. 3y agofdaclusterNamespace notation and optional dependency guards
  12. 3y agofdaclusterHierarchical clustering, DBSCAN and a shared result class arrive together

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fdacluster and sps?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Infra & APIs. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fdacluster better than sps?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. sps is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Infra & APIs products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fdacluster?

Top fdacluster alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fdacluster alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fdacluster for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to sps?

Top sps alternatives in Infra & APIs are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "sps alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sps for the full list with editorial commentary on each.