← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Converse.js vs Element

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Converse.js and Element — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Converse.js vs Element: at a glance

FeatureConverse.jsElement
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesxmpp, omemo-encryption, e2e-usability, pubsub-apiencryption, recovery-keys, device-verification, module-api
Last editorial update3mo ago5d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Converse.js?

Converse.js 14 lands OMEMO:2 — the browser XMPP client catches up on modern encryption.

Converse.js reached 14.0.0 in June 2026 after a tight beta train, and the release is defined by one thing: support for OMEMO:2, the current revision of XMPP's end-to-end encryption. The surrounding work is all encryption ergonomics — per-chat encryption state remembered across chat-close and re-login, an explicit error surfaced for undecryptable messages instead of silently dropping them, the toggle hidden on untrusted devices, and original filenames preserved on encrypted image download. New PubSub API methods for create, subscribe and unsubscribe round out the release.

Read the full Converse.js trajectory →

What is Element?

Element 1.12.33 ships: simpler recovery keys, mandatory verification, no libolm migration.

Element Web is in a sustained crypto-UX cleanup. The last three release lines made device verification mandatory by default, removed guest-token and NEB-link attack surface, and 1.12.33 now trims the recovery-key setup flow and prompts users about their key on logout. Alongside that, the legacy customisation API is gone and the Module API is growing X.509 identity hooks.

Read the full Element trajectory →

Converse.js vs Element: editorial side-by-side

C0.0

Converse.js 14 lands OMEMO:2 — the browser XMPP client catches up on modern encryption.

◆ Current state

Converse.js reached 14.0.0 in June 2026 after a tight beta train, and the release is defined by one thing: support for OMEMO:2, the current revision of XMPP's end-to-end encryption. The surrounding work is all encryption ergonomics — per-chat encryption state remembered across chat-close and re-login, an explicit error surfaced for undecryptable messages instead of silently dropping them, the toggle hidden on untrusted devices, and original filenames preserved on encrypted image download. New PubSub API methods for create, subscribe and unsubscribe round out the release.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is closing the gap between having encryption and having usable encryption. Almost every OMEMO change in this cycle is about failure modes users previously had to guess at: a silently dropped message, an encryption toggle offered where it cannot work, an abandoned bundle that never self-healed. That is the work a client does when its encryption is no longer a demo but something people depend on daily. Dropping client-compress for native browser APIs points the same way — fewer bundled dependencies in a security-sensitive path.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 14.x line to settle into interoperability fixes as OMEMO:2 meets other XMPP clients in the wild, with the new PubSub API the most likely base for the next feature layer.

E
Element
COMMS
5.0

Element 1.12.33 ships: simpler recovery keys, mandatory verification, no libolm migration.

◆ Current state

Element Web is in a sustained crypto-UX cleanup. The last three release lines made device verification mandatory by default, removed guest-token and NEB-link attack surface, and 1.12.33 now trims the recovery-key setup flow and prompts users about their key on logout. Alongside that, the legacy customisation API is gone and the Module API is growing X.509 identity hooks.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is consistent: fewer optional security steps, more enforced ones, and a smaller legacy surface. Dropping libolm session migration means the Rust crypto stack is now the only path, and the X.509 work signals identity verification built for managed deployments.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release candidates to keep polishing recovery and verification dialogs, with further X.509 verification pieces landing in the Module API.

Alternatives to Converse.js and Element

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Converse.js or Element.

See all Converse.js alternatives → · See all Element alternatives →

Recent activity from Converse.js and Element

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5d agoElementElement 1.12.33 ships simpler recovery keys, ends libolm migration
  2. 13d agoElement1.12.33 RC simplifies recovery keys, drops libolm migration
  3. 16d agoElementElement 1.12.32 removes guest tokens and NEB links to fix 2 advisories
  4. 19d agoElementElement 1.12.31 makes device verification mandatory by default
  5. 24d agoElement1.12.31 second release candidate, feature list unchanged
  6. 26d agoElementRC adds PDF/Markdown viewers, mandatory device verification
  7. 4mo agoConverse.jsOMEMO:2 encryption support ships in Converse 14 ⚡
  8. 4mo agoConverse.jsOMEMO bundle self-healing and new PubSub API methods
  9. 4mo agoConverse.jslibomemo.js dependency bump
  10. 4mo agoConverse.jsclient-compress replaced with native browser APIs
  11. 4mo agoConverse.jsFirst beta carrying the OMEMO usability fixes
  12. 5mo agoConverse.jsReaction attribution and MUC JID parsing fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Converse.js and Element?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Converse.js better than Element?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Converse.js?

Top Converse.js alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Converse.js alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/converse-js for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Element?

Top Element alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-web for the full list with editorial commentary on each.