← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Converse.js vs Element

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Converse.js and Element — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Converse.js vs Element: at a glance

FeatureConverse.jsElement
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score0.05.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesxmpp, omemo-encryption, e2e-usability, pubsub-apimatrix, open-source, messaging, mvvm
Last editorial update1mo ago23h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Converse.js?

Converse.js 14 lands OMEMO:2 — the browser XMPP client catches up on modern encryption.

Converse.js reached 14.0.0 in June 2026 after a tight beta train, and the release is defined by one thing: support for OMEMO:2, the current revision of XMPP's end-to-end encryption. The surrounding work is all encryption ergonomics — per-chat encryption state remembered across chat-close and re-login, an explicit error surfaced for undecryptable messages instead of silently dropping them, the toggle hidden on untrusted devices, and original filenames preserved on encrypted image download. New PubSub API methods for create, subscribe and unsubscribe round out the release.

Read the full Converse.js trajectory →

What is Element?

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

Read the full Element trajectory →

Converse.js vs Element: editorial side-by-side

C0.0

Converse.js 14 lands OMEMO:2 — the browser XMPP client catches up on modern encryption.

◆ Current state

Converse.js reached 14.0.0 in June 2026 after a tight beta train, and the release is defined by one thing: support for OMEMO:2, the current revision of XMPP's end-to-end encryption. The surrounding work is all encryption ergonomics — per-chat encryption state remembered across chat-close and re-login, an explicit error surfaced for undecryptable messages instead of silently dropping them, the toggle hidden on untrusted devices, and original filenames preserved on encrypted image download. New PubSub API methods for create, subscribe and unsubscribe round out the release.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is closing the gap between having encryption and having usable encryption. Almost every OMEMO change in this cycle is about failure modes users previously had to guess at: a silently dropped message, an encryption toggle offered where it cannot work, an abandoned bundle that never self-healed. That is the work a client does when its encryption is no longer a demo but something people depend on daily. Dropping client-compress for native browser APIs points the same way — fewer bundled dependencies in a security-sensitive path.

◆ Prediction

Expect the 14.x line to settle into interoperability fixes as OMEMO:2 meets other XMPP clients in the wild, with the new PubSub API the most likely base for the next feature layer.

E
Element
COMMS
5.0

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

◆ Current state

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

◆ Where it's heading

The Timeline MVVM series is the defining architectural investment of this window — replacing the legacy timeline rendering with a proper view-model separation. This is foundational work that typically precedes faster feature delivery on the timeline surface (thread UX, call integration, richer message types). Parallel work promoting Custom Themes to devtools and updating bundle configurations signals cleanup of the extension and theming surface alongside the core refactor.

◆ Prediction

A Timeline MVVM part 3 or final integration is the immediate next step; once complete, expect improved thread UX or voice/video call timeline integration as the first beneficiaries of the new architecture.

Alternatives to Converse.js and Element

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Converse.js or Element.

See all Converse.js alternatives → · See all Element alternatives →

Recent activity from Converse.js and Element

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1d agoElementElement v1.12.28: glibc 2.34 minimum, drops Debian bullseye
  2. 8d agoElementElement Banner module v2.0.0
  3. 8d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.1
  4. 8d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.0
  5. 16d agoElementElement v1.12.27: Timeline MVVM part 2
  6. 20d agoElementElement v1.12.27-rc.1
  7. 2mo agoConverse.jsOMEMO:2 encryption support ships in Converse 14
  8. 2mo agoConverse.jsOMEMO bundle self-healing and new PubSub API methods
  9. 3mo agoConverse.jslibomemo.js dependency bump
  10. 3mo agoConverse.jsclient-compress replaced with native browser APIs
  11. 3mo agoConverse.jsFirst beta carrying the OMEMO usability fixes
  12. 3mo agoConverse.jsReaction attribution and MUC JID parsing fixes

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Converse.js and Element?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Converse.js better than Element?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Converse.js?

Top Converse.js alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Converse.js alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/converse-js for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Element?

Top Element alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-web for the full list with editorial commentary on each.