← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

antaresread vs cTMed

A side-by-side editorial comparison of antaresread and cTMed — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

antaresread vs cTMed: at a glance

FeatureantaresreadcTMed
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesr-package, energy-modeling, api-compatibility, breaking-changesmediation-analysis, continuous-time-models, r-package, statistical-methods
Last editorial update39m ago2h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is antaresread?

The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next

antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.

Read the full antaresread trajectory →

What is cTMed?

Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work

cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.

Read the full cTMed trajectory →

antaresread vs cTMed: editorial side-by-side

A
antaresread
ANALYTICS
0.0

The R reader for Antares Simulator studies, pinned to whatever the simulator ships next

◆ Current state

antaresRead loads Antares Simulator studies from disk or the Antares Web API into R. Its release history maps one-to-one onto simulator versions: 2.9.2 for Antares 9.2, 2.9.3 for 9.3, and the 3.0.x line for the study-format changes that followed. The recurring work is the converted study version format (9.0 becoming 900) which has now been fixed or re-fixed in three consecutive releases, and 3.1.0 turns that churn into a declared breaking change as Antares Web 2.33.0 introduces yet another numbering scheme.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is a compatibility layer whose roadmap is set entirely upstream, and version identity is where it keeps getting cut. The same .getSimOptionsAPI() version-format fix appears in 3.0.0, 3.0.1 and again in 3.1.0 — three passes at one problem, which suggests the API and disk representations of a study version have not converged. Alongside that, API-mode work is displacing disk-mode work: dedicated endpoints for output listing, district definitions, per-area output handling.

◆ Prediction

The next release will most likely track the following Antares Simulator or Antares Web version, and given the 3.1.0 breaking change, a follow-up correcting the new numbering scheme is a reasonable expectation.

C
cTMed
ANALYTICS
2.5

Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work

◆ Current state

cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.

◆ Prediction

The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.

Alternatives to antaresread and cTMed

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either antaresread or cTMed.

See all antaresread alternatives → · See all cTMed alternatives →

Recent activity from antaresread and cTMed

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 27d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
  2. 1mo agoantaresreadBreaking: new API study-version numbering from Antares Web 2.33.0
  3. 2mo agoantaresreadReads the new MIN GEN thermal output variable from Antares 9.2
  4. 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
  5. 6mo agoantaresreadFixes area output imports for Antares 9.3 studies
  6. 6mo agoantaresreadVersion bump for CRAN release
  7. 9mo agoantaresreadAdds support for Antares Simulator 9.3 studies
  8. 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
  9. 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
  10. 10mo agoantaresreadAdds read_storages_constraints() for Antares 9.2 storage constraints
  11. 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
  12. 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between antaresread and cTMed?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is antaresread better than cTMed?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to antaresread?

Top antaresread alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "antaresread alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/antaresread for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to cTMed?

Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.