← Back to analytics tools
Alternatives · analytics tools

cTMed alternatives

The best cTMed alternatives in analytics tools, ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score.

Updated Aug 17, 2026

Looking for the best alternatives to cTMed? Sparkpulse tracks and ranks 12 alternatives in analytics tools by shipping velocity — how frequently each ships meaningful updates, verified from official changelogs. For reference, cTMed shipped 0 meaningful updates in the last 30 days and carries a velocity score of 2.5 out of 10 in 2026. The alternatives below are ranked the same way, so you're comparing real release momentum, not marketing claims.

About cTMed

Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work

cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.

Velocity 2.5 · Last update 1h ago

Read the full cTMed trajectory →

Top 12 alternatives to cTMed

Ranked by recent ship velocity. Tap any card for the full editorial breakdown, or pivot to a head-to-head.

Browse all analytics tools products →

cTMed vs alternatives — shipping velocity at a glance

Velocity score (0–10) and meaningful releases shipped in the last 30 days, from official changelogs. Higher = shipping faster.

ProductVelocitySparks · 30dFocus areasLatest release
cTMed (baseline)2.50mediation-analysiscontinuous-time-modelsr-package
glmbayes6.31bayesian-statisticsgeneralized-linear-modelsopenclOpenCL split out to nmathopencl; insight and bayestestR integration
lstar5.00single-cell-genomicszarrwasmlstar 0.2.0
trendseries3.81time-serieseconometricsr-packageDecomposition becomes a first-class operation, five methods deep
qtl22.50qtl-mappingstatistical-geneticsbioinformaticsA genome scan that takes your own likelihood function
r-owidapi2.50open-dataour-world-in-datar-package
quanteda2.50text-analysisnatural-language-processingr-packageCRAN v4.0
moderndive2.50statistics-educationwebrregression
PurpleAir0.00air-qualitysensor-datar-package
piecepackr0.00board-gamesgraphicsr-package
e2tree0.00explainable-aiensemble-methodsdecision-treesA significance-tested measure of explanation fidelity
discretefdr0.00multiple-testingfalse-discovery-ratediscrete-statistics
contentanalysis0.00text-analysisbibliometricsscientific-writingSentence-level rhetorical move classification arrives

The 12 best cTMed alternatives, in depth

1. glmbayes · velocity 6.3

A GPU-accelerated Bayesian GLM package buys its way into the standard R Bayesian toolchain.

Over the last 30 days glmbayes shipped 1 meaningful update vs cTMed's 0, most recently “OpenCL split out to nmathopencl; insight and bayestestR integration”. Its velocity score of 6.3/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, glmbayes focuses on bayesian statistics, generalized linear models and opencl.

Over the last 30 days glmbayes has been shipping faster than cTMed — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

2. lstar · velocity 5.0

A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces.

Its velocity score of 5.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “lstar 0.2.0”.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, lstar focuses on single cell genomics, zarr and wasm.

lstar and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

3. trendseries · velocity 3.8

A trend-extraction toolkit grows a full decomposition engine, seasonal components and all.

Over the last 30 days trendseries shipped 1 meaningful update vs cTMed's 0, most recently “Decomposition becomes a first-class operation, five methods deep”. Its velocity score of 3.8/10 blends that with longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, trendseries focuses on time series, econometrics and r package.

Over the last 30 days trendseries has been shipping faster than cTMed — a point in its favour if release momentum matters to you.

4. qtl2 · velocity 2.5

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “A genome scan that takes your own likelihood function”.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, qtl2 focuses on qtl mapping, statistical genetics and bioinformatics.

qtl2 and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

5. r-owidapi · velocity 2.5

The R client for Our World in Data found its search had been reading a tenth of the catalog.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, r-owidapi focuses on open data, our world in data and r package.

r-owidapi and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

6. quanteda · velocity 2.5

Text analysis in R keeps optimising its token internals — and builds a path out to torch.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “CRAN v4.0”.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, quanteda focuses on text analysis, natural language processing and r package.

quanteda and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

7. moderndive · velocity 2.5

The ModernDive teaching package learns to render inside the browser that runs its own textbook.

Its velocity score of 2.5/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, moderndive focuses on statistics education, webr and regression.

moderndive and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

8. PurpleAir · velocity 0.0

The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, PurpleAir focuses on air quality, sensor data and r package.

PurpleAir and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

9. piecepackr · velocity 0.0

A board game graphics package runs one of the most disciplined deprecation cycles in R.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, piecepackr focuses on board games, graphics and r package.

piecepackr and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

10. e2tree · velocity 0.0

The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “A significance-tested measure of explanation fidelity”.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, e2tree focuses on explainable ai, ensemble methods and decision trees.

e2tree and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

11. discretefdr · velocity 0.0

The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, discretefdr focuses on multiple testing, false discovery rate and discrete statistics.

discretefdr and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

12. contentanalysis · velocity 0.0

A scientific-text analysis package moved from counting citations to classifying argument structure.

Its velocity score of 0.0/10 reflects longer-term release cadence; its most recent meaningful update was “Sentence-level rhetorical move classification arrives”.

Where cTMed leans on mediation analysis, continuous time models and r package, contentanalysis focuses on text analysis, bibliometrics and scientific writing.

contentanalysis and cTMed have shipped at a similar pace over the last 30 days, so the decision comes down to fit and feature depth.

Frequently asked questions

What are the best alternatives to cTMed?

The top cTMed alternatives we currently track in analytics tools are glmbayes, lstar, trendseries, qtl2, r-owidapi, ranked by recent ship velocity.

How is this list of cTMed alternatives ranked?

Alternatives are ranked by Sparkpulse's velocity_score — release cadence + 30-day spark count + sector-relative ship rate.

Can I compare cTMed directly with one of these alternatives?

Yes — every card has a "Compare with cTMed" link to a side-by-side /compare page.