PurpleAir
The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.
Comparison · Analytics
cTMed vs glmbayes
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cTMed and glmbayes — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
cTMed vs glmbayes: at a glance
What is cTMed?
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
What is glmbayes?
A GPU-accelerated Bayesian GLM package buys its way into the standard R Bayesian toolchain
glmbayes fits Bayesian generalized linear models with optional OpenCL acceleration. The last four months moved it from a package with its own vocabulary to one that answers the insight and bayestestR generics the rest of the R Bayesian ecosystem is built on, while pushing the OpenCL kernels out into a separate nmathopencl dependency that carries CRAN Windows binaries. It returned to CRAN in August after an archival over a configure policy issue.
cTMed vs glmbayes: editorial side-by-side
cTMed
2.5ANALYTICS
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
◆ Current state
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.
◆ Prediction
The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.
glmbayes
6.3ANALYTICS
A GPU-accelerated Bayesian GLM package buys its way into the standard R Bayesian toolchain
◆ Current state
glmbayes fits Bayesian generalized linear models with optional OpenCL acceleration. The last four months moved it from a package with its own vocabulary to one that answers the insight and bayestestR generics the rest of the R Bayesian ecosystem is built on, while pushing the OpenCL kernels out into a separate nmathopencl dependency that carries CRAN Windows binaries. It returned to CRAN in August after an archival over a configure policy issue.
◆ Where it's heading
The arc is about removing reasons not to use it. GPU support was previously blocked on Windows because the OpenCL kernels were vendored; splitting them into a CRAN package with binaries fixed that. The ecosystem work does the same thing for tooling — a glmb fit now responds to get_parameters, get_priors, simulate_prior and check_prior, so it drops into workflows built around easystats rather than requiring its own. The CRAN archival and the configure fixes that followed show how much of the effort goes into distribution rather than modelling.
◆ Prediction
get_priors() returning the full prior specification rather than a marginal table is the kind of detail that invites further bayestestR integration, and the diagnostic surface is the least built-out part of what has shipped so far.
Alternatives to cTMed and glmbayes
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cTMed or glmbayes.
piecepackr
A board game graphics package runs one of the most disciplined deprecation cycles in R.
e2tree
The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.
discretefdr
The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.
contentanalysis
A scientific-text analysis package moved from counting citations to classifying argument structure.
relialearnr
The teaching arm of an R reliability suite keeps pace with whatever its analysis siblings ship.
See all cTMed alternatives → · See all glmbayes alternatives →
Recent activity from cTMed and glmbayes
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 10d agoglmbayesBack on CRAN after a configure policy fix
- 22d agoglmbayesOpenCL split out to nmathopencl; insight and bayestestR integration ⚡
- 27d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
- 1mo agoglmbayesMulti-response models and conjugate GLM priors
- 3mo agoglmbayesOpenCL kernels restructured and a binomial GPU bug fixed
- 3mo agoglmbayesVersion bump for CRAN resubmission
- 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
- 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
- 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
- 1y agoglmbayesCRAN-ready beta with the core S3 interface
- 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
- 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between cTMed and glmbayes?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. glmbayes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is cTMed better than glmbayes?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. glmbayes is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 2.5), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to cTMed?
Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to glmbayes?
Top glmbayes alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "glmbayes alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/glmbayes for the full list with editorial commentary on each.