PurpleAir
The R client for PurpleAir sensors keeps finding its time-averaging was wrong.
Comparison · Analytics
cTMed vs moderndive
A side-by-side editorial comparison of cTMed and moderndive — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
cTMed vs moderndive: at a glance
What is cTMed?
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
What is moderndive?
The ModernDive teaching package learns to render inside the browser that runs its own textbook
moderndive supplies the datasets, regression helpers and ggplot geoms used by the ModernDive introductory statistics textbook. Its release history is mostly dataset accumulation — much of it contributed by students in batches — punctuated by occasional function work. The latest release is different: it fixes View() so it renders inside webR, the in-browser R that powers the book's live exercises, and reworks the regression helpers to survive in-formula transformations.
cTMed vs moderndive: editorial side-by-side
cTMed
2.5ANALYTICS
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
◆ Current state
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.
◆ Prediction
The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.
moderndive
2.5ANALYTICS
The ModernDive teaching package learns to render inside the browser that runs its own textbook
◆ Current state
moderndive supplies the datasets, regression helpers and ggplot geoms used by the ModernDive introductory statistics textbook. Its release history is mostly dataset accumulation — much of it contributed by students in batches — punctuated by occasional function work. The latest release is different: it fixes View() so it renders inside webR, the in-browser R that powers the book's live exercises, and reworks the regression helpers to survive in-formula transformations.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is following the textbook's second edition into the browser. webR has no pandoc, so the DT htmlwidget path the package relied on cannot produce the self-contained HTML the notebook cell needs, and the auto-print path was gated behind interactive() being false — meaning students working through the live exercises saw an explanatory message where a table should have been. Building a static HTML table and pushing it through webR's viewer hook is a small change with a direct effect on whether the book's interactive mode works at all.
◆ Prediction
With the book's v2 datasets landed and the browser rendering path fixed, the remaining friction is most likely in other functions that assume a desktop R session.
Alternatives to cTMed and moderndive
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cTMed or moderndive.
piecepackr
A board game graphics package runs one of the most disciplined deprecation cycles in R.
e2tree
The explainable-ensemble-tree package now measures whether its own explanations are faithful.
discretefdr
The discrete-data FDR package is being pared into one piece of a larger multiple-testing suite.
contentanalysis
A scientific-text analysis package moved from counting citations to classifying argument structure.
relialearnr
The teaching arm of an R reliability suite keeps pace with whatever its analysis siblings ship.
See all cTMed alternatives → · See all moderndive alternatives →
Recent activity from cTMed and moderndive
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 12d agomoderndiveView() renders in webR; regression helpers survive formula transforms
- 26d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
- 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
- 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
- 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
- 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
- 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()
- 1y agomoderndiveDatasets and tidy_summary() for the second edition
- 2y agomoderndiveAlmond and flight datasets for the inference chapters
- 4y agomoderndiveTen student-curated teaching datasets
- 4y agomoderndiveAlaska flights subset added
- 5y agomoderndiveCleaner regression tables and an explicit conf.level argument
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between cTMed and moderndive?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. cTMed and moderndive are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is cTMed better than moderndive?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cTMed and moderndive are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 2.5 vs 2.5, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to cTMed?
Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to moderndive?
Top moderndive alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "moderndive alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/moderndive for the full list with editorial commentary on each.