fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
bayestools vs cTMed
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bayestools and cTMed — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
bayestools vs cTMed: at a glance
What is bayestools?
The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed
BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.
What is cTMed?
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
bayestools vs cTMed: editorial side-by-side
bayestools
0.0ANALYTICS
The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed
◆ Current state
BayesTools provides the shared JAGS fitting, prior and summary infrastructure that the author's meta-analysis packages build on. The 0.2.x line filled in modeling primitives — prior_mixture() and mixed-posterior objects in 0.2.18, expression-valued priors and lme4-style uncorrelated random effects in 0.2.20, then a run of small diagnostic fixes for mixture and spike-and-slab priors. Version 0.3.0 in May 2026 adds automatic standardization of continuous predictors, default priors for unspecified factor and continuous terms, and functions to transform prior and posterior samples back to the original scale.
◆ Where it's heading
This package's releases are best read against what depends on them. The 0.2.x fixes track features appearing in RoBMA one version later, and 0.3.0 landed a single day before RoBMA 4.0.0 — the standardization and sample-transformation functions are the substrate that rewrite needed. The direction of the work is toward sensible defaults: default priors by predictor type, automatic standardization for sampling stability, and transformation back to interpretable scale so the convenience does not cost the user their units.
◆ Prediction
Given how tightly its releases track downstream needs, the next version is most likely driven by gaps surfacing in RoBMA 4.0.x rather than by independent feature work.
cTMed
2.5ANALYTICS
Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work
◆ Current state
cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.
◆ Where it's heading
The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.
◆ Prediction
The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.
Alternatives to bayestools and cTMed
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bayestools or cTMed.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all bayestools alternatives → · See all cTMed alternatives →
Recent activity from bayestools and cTMed
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 27d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
- 3mo agobayestoolsAdds automatic predictor standardization and type-based default priors
- 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
- 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.23
- 8mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.22
- 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
- 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
- 11mo agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.21
- 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.20
- 1y agobayestoolsBayesTools 0.2.19
- 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
- 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between bayestools and cTMed?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is bayestools better than cTMed?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to bayestools?
Top bayestools alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bayestools alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bayestools for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to cTMed?
Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.