← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

cTMed vs fillpattern

A side-by-side editorial comparison of cTMed and fillpattern — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

cTMed vs fillpattern: at a glance

FeaturecTMedfillpattern
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmediation-analysis, continuous-time-models, r-package, statistical-methodsggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphics
Last editorial update3h ago40m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is cTMed?

Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work

cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.

Read the full cTMed trajectory →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

cTMed vs fillpattern: editorial side-by-side

C
cTMed
ANALYTICS
2.5

Continuous-time mediation effects get standardized centrality, six years into steady patch work

◆ Current state

cTMed computes direct, indirect and total effects for continuous-time mediation models, with delta-method, Monte Carlo and bootstrap variants of each. Development is a long run of patch releases from the jeksterslab account, roughly every two months, each adding a function or two. The latest adds standardized centrality measures and allows a diagonal sigma across ten standardized estimators.

◆ Where it's heading

The package is filling out a matrix rather than changing shape: for each effect type there is a delta-method, a Monte Carlo and a bootstrap path, and each release closes another cell. The 2025 releases were largely externally forced — an Armadillo 15.0.x transition at CRAN, a citation addition after the Psychological Methods paper landed — which suggests the statistical core has been settled since the 1.0.6 standardization revision.

◆ Prediction

The diagonal-sigma option has now reached the standardized estimators; extending it to the remaining unstandardized variants is the obvious next cell to fill.

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

Alternatives to cTMed and fillpattern

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either cTMed or fillpattern.

See all cTMed alternatives → · See all fillpattern alternatives →

Recent activity from cTMed and fillpattern

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 27d agocTMedStandardized centrality measures and diagonal-sigma support
  2. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  3. 6mo agocTMedMinor method edits
  4. 10mo agocTMedPackage citation added for the Psychological Methods paper
  5. 10mo agocTMedArmadillo 15.0.x compatibility for CRAN
  6. 1y agocTMedStandardization reworked around the steady-state covariance matrix
  7. 1y agocTMedBootstrap centrality estimators and MCPhiSigma()
  8. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  9. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between cTMed and fillpattern?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is cTMed better than fillpattern?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. cTMed is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to cTMed?

Top cTMed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "cTMed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ctmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.