← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Rspamd vs SimpleX Chat

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Rspamd and SimpleX Chat — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Rspamd vs SimpleX Chat: at a glance

FeatureRspamdSimpleX Chat
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score5.06.3
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesspam filtering, email authentication, input hardening, attachment extractionprivacy, channels, decentralization, message-signing
Last editorial update3h ago3mo ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Rspamd?

Rspamd 4.3 fixes SPF evaluation order and rejects weak DKIM keys, with results that change.

Rspamd 4.3.0 on November 13 is a correctness release with a long incompatible-changes list. SPF records are now evaluated in term order, closing a case where an explicit -ip4 deny could be overridden by a broader allow. DKIM rejects RSA keys under 1024 bits and signatures with duplicate tags, DMARC no longer drops a policy over an unknown tag, URL mismatches are scored apart from phishing, and PDF text extraction and archive unpacking change their output. Critical fixes cover a header line that could abort a worker from one unauthenticated HTTP request.

Read the full Rspamd trajectory →

What is SimpleX Chat?

The no-identifier messenger is building public channels — and has to invent trust from scratch

SimpleX Chat is deep in a v7.0 beta cycle, six betas in, with the stable armv7a tag now cut. The release is dominated by channels: broadcast surfaces with subscribers, contributor and moderator roles, searchable subscriber lists, and CLI access. Alongside them sits SimpleX names — registerable, resolvable names for channels and businesses — and per-server role controls that let self-hosters run a relay that handles only message reception, private routing, or name resolution.

Read the full SimpleX Chat trajectory →

Rspamd vs SimpleX Chat: editorial side-by-side

R
Rspamd
COMMS
5.0

Rspamd 4.3 fixes SPF evaluation order and rejects weak DKIM keys, with results that change.

◆ Current state

Rspamd 4.3.0 on November 13 is a correctness release with a long incompatible-changes list. SPF records are now evaluated in term order, closing a case where an explicit -ip4 deny could be overridden by a broader allow. DKIM rejects RSA keys under 1024 bits and signatures with duplicate tags, DMARC no longer drops a policy over an unknown tag, URL mismatches are scored apart from phishing, and PDF text extraction and archive unpacking change their output. Critical fixes cover a header line that could abort a worker from one unauthenticated HTTP request.

◆ Where it's heading

Since 4.1, every release has hardened parsers and closed memory-safety and trust gaps; 4.3 applies the same pass to the authentication standards themselves (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, ARC) and to content extraction. Operators should expect scores and fuzzy hashes to shift after upgrading, because the project now favours spec-correct results over backward-compatible ones.

◆ Prediction

A 4.3.x point release fixing regressions from these behaviour changes is the likely next step, as 4.2.1 followed 4.2.0 within two weeks.

S6.3

The no-identifier messenger is building public channels — and has to invent trust from scratch

◆ Current state

SimpleX Chat is deep in a v7.0 beta cycle, six betas in, with the stable armv7a tag now cut. The release is dominated by channels: broadcast surfaces with subscribers, contributor and moderator roles, searchable subscriber lists, and CLI access. Alongside them sits SimpleX names — registerable, resolvable names for channels and businesses — and per-server role controls that let self-hosters run a relay that handles only message reception, private routing, or name resolution.

◆ Where it's heading

This is the hardest problem the project has taken on. SimpleX's premise is that users have no identifiers at all, and public channels need exactly the opposite: a stable name people can find and an author they can verify. The answer taking shape is cryptographic rather than account-based — message signing, member security-code verification, and name resolution run as an opt-in server function. The betas since then have shifted from adding channel features to hardening the role model, rejecting forwards from unexpected admins and locking relay-role assignment.

◆ Prediction

A 7.0 stable release looks imminent given the non-beta tag, with message signing held back for 7.1 as the notes state. Expect the next cycle to turn signing on and continue tightening who can act as a relay or admin inside a channel.

Alternatives to Rspamd and SimpleX Chat

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Rspamd or SimpleX Chat.

See all Rspamd alternatives → · See all SimpleX Chat alternatives →

Recent activity from Rspamd and SimpleX Chat

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 22h agoRspamd4.3.0: SPF order fix, stricter DKIM, new truncation symbols
  2. 24d agoRspamd4.2.3: ARC trust fix, merged RBL queries, browser-style HTML parsing
  3. 1mo agoRspamd4.2.2: crypto wallet detection and changed MIME digests
  4. 1mo agoRspamd4.2.1: critical HTTP and memory-safety fixes
  5. 1mo agoRspamd4.2.0: public suffix lookup and attachment content extraction
  6. 3mo agoRspamdCloses an arbitrary file read reachable by any TCP client
  7. 3mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.6
  8. 3mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.5
  9. 3mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.4 ⚡
  10. 4mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0 beta 3: registrable SimpleX names for channels
  11. 4mo agoSimpleX ChatSimpleX 7.0-beta.2: subscriber roles and CLI channel connect
  12. 4mo agoSimpleX ChatPromote channel subscribers to contributors (v7.0 beta.1)

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Rspamd and SimpleX Chat?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. SimpleX Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Rspamd better than SimpleX Chat?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. SimpleX Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Rspamd?

Top Rspamd alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rspamd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rspamd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to SimpleX Chat?

Top SimpleX Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SimpleX Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/simplex-chat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.