← Back to home
Comparison · PM

OpenProject vs Teamhood

A side-by-side editorial comparison of OpenProject and Teamhood — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

OpenProject vs Teamhood: at a glance

FeatureOpenProjectTeamhood
SectorPMPM
Velocity score7.51.3
Sparks · 30d10
Top themesagile-tooling, jira-migration, security-hardening, community-editionproject-management, enterprise-pm, aec-vertical, plan-restructure
Last editorial update9d ago3h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is OpenProject?

OpenProject leans into Jira migration and agile parity while absorbing a sustained bug-bounty wave

OpenProject is shipping aggressively across five maintained release branches simultaneously. 17.4 promotes the Jira Migrator out of feature-flag status with basic custom-field migration, and 17.3 reshapes the agile primitives — dedicated sprint objects, all action board types moved into the free Community edition, in-place project attribute editing, nested groups. The codebase is also absorbing a continuous stream of security disclosures (CVE-2026-44731 through -44736, GHSA-r85r, GHSA-hh5p, others) from an EU-sponsored YesWeHack bug bounty, with backported fixes landing across 16.6.x, 17.0.x, 17.1.x, 17.2.x, and 17.3.x on the same day as the headline release.

Read the full OpenProject trajectory →

What is Teamhood?

Teamhood's signal is enterprise-AEC marketing — case studies, listicles, one Dec plan consolidation.

The visible feed is dominated by content marketing — SEO listicles ('Best Enterprise PM Software 2026', '10 Best AI Tools for PM'), customer case studies from architecture and engineering firms (2L Architects, Tyrens on Rail Baltica), and framework/template content (Value Stream Map, Fishbone, time blocking). The single product signal in the window is the December 2025 plan refresh that retired the Premium tier and folded its features into Team at no price impact.

Read the full Teamhood trajectory →

OpenProject vs Teamhood: editorial side-by-side

O7.5

OpenProject leans into Jira migration and agile parity while absorbing a sustained bug-bounty wave

◆ Current state

OpenProject is shipping aggressively across five maintained release branches simultaneously. 17.4 promotes the Jira Migrator out of feature-flag status with basic custom-field migration, and 17.3 reshapes the agile primitives — dedicated sprint objects, all action board types moved into the free Community edition, in-place project attribute editing, nested groups. The codebase is also absorbing a continuous stream of security disclosures (CVE-2026-44731 through -44736, GHSA-r85r, GHSA-hh5p, others) from an EU-sponsored YesWeHack bug bounty, with backported fixes landing across 16.6.x, 17.0.x, 17.1.x, 17.2.x, and 17.3.x on the same day as the headline release.

◆ Where it's heading

The dual focus — Jira parity (custom-field migration, sprint objects, flexible backlogs) and a deliberate Community-edition expansion (all action boards now free) — reads as a coordinated squeeze on Jira during Atlassian's Cloud-only migration push. The bug-bounty volume is unusual for a project this size and suggests OpenProject has crossed into enterprise-credibility scrutiny; the response pattern — same-day backports five branches deep — shows the maintainers treating security disclosures as cross-branch events by default.

◆ Prediction

The next minor release will likely round out the Jira Migrator — workflow and automation migration are the obvious next pieces given custom fields are now beta-complete. Continued public bounty intake will keep producing authorization and IDOR fixes; expect another coordinated cross-branch security cut within weeks.

T1.3

Teamhood's signal is enterprise-AEC marketing — case studies, listicles, one Dec plan consolidation.

◆ Current state

The visible feed is dominated by content marketing — SEO listicles ('Best Enterprise PM Software 2026', '10 Best AI Tools for PM'), customer case studies from architecture and engineering firms (2L Architects, Tyrens on Rail Baltica), and framework/template content (Value Stream Map, Fishbone, time blocking). The single product signal in the window is the December 2025 plan refresh that retired the Premium tier and folded its features into Team at no price impact.

◆ Where it's heading

Teamhood is positioning hard for the enterprise PM and AEC (architecture/engineering/construction) niches — the case-study selection and the 'enterprise' listicle both point there. The plan consolidation suggests a simpler good/better/best ladder, often a precursor to a sales-led motion. Product cadence is light to invisible in this window; the marketing is doing the work.

◆ Prediction

Expect more enterprise-flavored output — security/compliance positioning, additional AEC references, and likely an AI-feature announcement to back the AI-tools listicle. If a real product release lands, it will most likely sit in resource planning or portfolio reporting — the territory enterprise buyers ask for.

Alternatives to OpenProject and Teamhood

Other PM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either OpenProject or Teamhood.

See all OpenProject alternatives → · See all Teamhood alternatives →

Recent activity from OpenProject and Teamhood

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4d agoTeamhoodBest Enterprise Project Management Software for 2026
  2. 10d agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.4.0
  3. 10d agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.3.2
  4. 10d agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.2.4
  5. 1mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.3.1
  6. 1mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.3.0
  7. 1mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.1.4
  8. 5mo agoTeamhood10 Best AI Tools for Project Management: Latest Reviews
  9. 5mo agoTeamhoodPremium tier retired; features fold into Team plan
  10. 5mo agoTeamhood2L Architects & Engineers: Structuring Creativity in Architecture Projects
  11. 6mo agoTeamhoodThe Vibe Coding Paradox: Don’t Be Lazy
  12. 8mo agoTeamhoodTyrens Lietuva: Managing International Engineering Projects

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between OpenProject and Teamhood?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. OpenProject is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 1.3), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is OpenProject better than Teamhood?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. OpenProject is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 1.3), with 1 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other PM products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to OpenProject?

Top OpenProject alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenProject alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openproject for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Teamhood?

Top Teamhood alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Teamhood alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/teamhood for the full list with editorial commentary on each.