Postmark
Postmark adds its own SOC 2 Type 2 report to a run of security work.
Comparison · Comms
Matrix vs Rocket.Chat
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Matrix and Rocket.Chat — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Matrix vs Rocket.Chat: at a glance
What is Matrix?
Matrix 2.0 is nearly through the spec process, and governments are the audience
The Matrix spec process has moved quickly since the 2026 conference. MatrixRTC, its LiveKit transport, the voice and video calling application, sticky events and the sliding sync extensions were all accepted in the 30 October update, leaving MSC4480 and MSC4075 outstanding before Matrix 2.0. The conference drew more than 340 people, with civil servants from 15 nations and organizations. Talks came from FITKO, DINUM, UNICC and NATO, among others.
What is Rocket.Chat?
Rocket.Chat patches 8.9 LTS with the load fixes from 9.0 while the candidate reaches rc.7.
The 9.0 candidate line opened on 27 October with a licensing change: LDAP, SAML and Custom OAuth now require a premium plan. Since rc.4 the candidates have been fixes: rc.5 drops removed-license features for connected users and redacts OAuth codes from logs, rc.6 fixes Matrix federation auth, and rc.7 stops a web and desktop client memory leak and moves native LiveKit video to beta. On 6 November 8.9.1 LTS backported the notification, presence and startup load fixes plus a security hotfix.
Matrix vs Rocket.Chat: editorial side-by-side
Matrix
5.0COMMS
Matrix 2.0 is nearly through the spec process, and governments are the audience
◆ Current state
The Matrix spec process has moved quickly since the 2026 conference. MatrixRTC, its LiveKit transport, the voice and video calling application, sticky events and the sliding sync extensions were all accepted in the 30 October update, leaving MSC4480 and MSC4075 outstanding before Matrix 2.0. The conference drew more than 340 people, with civil servants from 15 nations and organizations. Talks came from FITKO, DINUM, UNICC and NATO, among others.
◆ Where it's heading
Two tracks now run together: finishing a protocol generation that puts real-time calling in the specification, and turning European digital-sovereignty policy into adoption and funding. The Foundation's own message is that usage is outrunning support. Only DINUM among government agencies is a member, so membership, certification and training are being explored as revenue. A federated calendaring proposal shows the spec work is already looking past 2.0.
◆ Prediction
The spec team says Matrix 2.0 follows shortly after the two remaining MSCs are merged, so that declaration is the next major event. Foundation funding is the less certain thread: the entries list ideas but no commitments.
Rocket.Chat
6.3COMMS
Rocket.Chat patches 8.9 LTS with the load fixes from 9.0 while the candidate reaches rc.7.
◆ Current state
The 9.0 candidate line opened on 27 October with a licensing change: LDAP, SAML and Custom OAuth now require a premium plan. Since rc.4 the candidates have been fixes: rc.5 drops removed-license features for connected users and redacts OAuth codes from logs, rc.6 fixes Matrix federation auth, and rc.7 stops a web and desktop client memory leak and moves native LiveKit video to beta. On 6 November 8.9.1 LTS backported the notification, presence and startup load fixes plus a security hotfix.
◆ Where it's heading
9.0 is in stabilization: each candidate is smaller than the last, and the load fixes are being carried to the LTS line rather than held for the major. Native LiveKit video is being promoted step by step, from alpha to beta and now as the named default provider option.
◆ Prediction
With rc.7 down to a handful of fixes, 9.0.0 GA is the next likely release, followed by further 8.9.x LTS patches carrying the same fixes.
Alternatives to Matrix and Rocket.Chat
Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Matrix or Rocket.Chat.
Element X Android
Element X Android turns on multi-select forwarding and better search in v26.11.0.
Fonoster
Fonoster lets voice agents pick Anthropic, Google or Groq models and record calls with one switch.
Salesmsg
Salesmsg's Sherpa AI now sends replies and builds broadcasts on request, with approval first.
Proton Bridge
Proton Bridge v3.27.2 adds support for the oo7 keyring on Linux.
Netcore Cloud
Netcore keeps publishing unified-platform explainers with no product release.
See all Matrix alternatives → · See all Rocket.Chat alternatives →
Recent activity from Matrix and Rocket.Chat
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agoRocket.Chat8.9.1 LTS: load fixes from 9.0 plus a security hotfix
- 4d agoRocket.Chat9.0 rc.7: client memory leak fixed, LiveKit video moves to beta
- 4d agoRocket.Chat9.0 rc.6: Matrix federation auth header fix
- 5d agoRocket.Chat9.0 rc.5: removed-license features shut off, OAuth codes redacted
- 6d agoRocket.Chat9.0 rc.4: notifications, presence and startup fixed under load
- 10d agoRocket.Chat9.0 rc.3: REST refusals become 403; /hooks status codes change
- 10d agoMatrixMatrixRTC and sliding sync MSCs accepted ahead of Matrix 2.0
- 10d agoMatrixThe Matrix Conference 2026: Our biggest edition yet
- 10d agoMatrixCall for Participation - FOSDEM 2027 Decentralised Messaging Devroom
- 17d agoMatrixThis Week in Matrix 2026-10-23
- 24d agoMatrixThis Week in Matrix 2026-10-16
- 26d agoMatrixWhat will it take to build an open source Europe and how the Digital Commons EDIC can help
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Matrix and Rocket.Chat?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Matrix better than Rocket.Chat?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rocket.Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Matrix?
Top Matrix alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Matrix alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/matrix for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Rocket.Chat?
Top Rocket.Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rocket.Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rocketchat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.