← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

lstar vs qtl2

A side-by-side editorial comparison of lstar and qtl2 — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

lstar vs qtl2: at a glance

Featurelstarqtl2
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score5.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themessingle-cell-genomics, zarr, wasm, data-formatsqtl-mapping, statistical-genetics, bioinformatics, r-package
Last editorial update2h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is lstar?

A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces

lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.

Read the full lstar trajectory →

What is qtl2?

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

Read the full qtl2 trajectory →

lstar vs qtl2: editorial side-by-side

L
lstar
ANALYTICS
5.0

A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces

◆ Current state

lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is making a hosted store cheap to read. Sharding addresses the file-per-chunk explosion that makes many-chunk arrays awkward to host; per-field compression with chunk-granular resolution means colouring an embedding by one gene fetches one column rather than an array. The 0.2.x patches are the cost of maintaining four surfaces at once — a WASM heap crash that only browsers exercise, and a count-basis orientation defect where all three surfaces normalized in memory and none owned the on-disk layout.

◆ Prediction

The orientation bug's root cause — no surface owning the on-disk representation while all three normalized in memory — is the kind of gap that usually produces a validation or ownership change rather than another point fix.

Q
qtl2
ANALYTICS
2.5

The standard QTL mapping package in R opened its genome scan to user-supplied likelihood models.

◆ Current state

qtl2 is the R toolkit for QTL mapping in experimental crosses, covering genotype probability calculation, genome scans with and without polygenic effects, permutation testing, SNP association, and the plotting that goes with them. The last year of work has pushed hard in two directions: tooling for high-throughput expression and protein QTL studies, and a generalisation of the scan engine itself so the log-likelihood being maximised can be supplied by the user. Note that the release history reached this feed out of order, so feed position is not a reliable guide to which release came first.

◆ Where it's heading

The eQTL and pQTL direction is the clearest thread — cis-trans plots, hotspot counting over a sliding window, multi-trait scan heat maps, and genome-wide genotype plots all arrived together, which is the toolkit an experiment with thousands of traits needs rather than one with a handful. Running underneath it is a steady generalisation of the core: a scan function that accepts an arbitrary likelihood, permutations that work with alternative scan functions, full variance-covariance output from single-position fits. Performance and parallelism get attention each cycle, including a more considerate default that leaves one core free. The rest is the ordinary maintenance of a long-lived package — renames to avoid tidyverse collisions, compiler warnings, and correctness fixes on specific cross types.

◆ Prediction

With scan1gen and permutation support for alternative scan functions in place, the natural next step is more model types built on that hook rather than more special-cased scan functions; the entries do not indicate which models are planned.

Alternatives to lstar and qtl2

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either lstar or qtl2.

See all lstar alternatives → · See all qtl2 alternatives →

Recent activity from lstar and qtl2

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 21d agolstarViewer count-basis orientation fixed; existing stores need re-prep
  2. 26d agolstarWASM viewer crash on resizable heaps fixed
  3. 27d agoqtl2chr_lengths() extended to cross2 objects
  4. 1mo agolstarlstar 0.2.0
  5. 1mo agoqtl2A genome scan that takes your own likelihood function
  6. 1mo agolstarMeasure state inferred from content, not slot name
  7. 2mo agoqtl2Hotspot counting and cis-trans plots for eQTL studies
  8. 3mo agoqtl2Confidence interval plotting, plus a documentation correction
  9. 1y agoqtl2Finer-grained parallelism for kinship-based scans
  10. 1y agoqtl2CSV readers renamed to avoid the readr collision

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between lstar and qtl2?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is lstar better than qtl2?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to lstar?

Top lstar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lstar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lstar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to qtl2?

Top qtl2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "qtl2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/qtl2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.