nflreadr
The nflverse data loader, whose releases are dictated by the NFL calendar and CRAN's archive policy
Comparison · Analytics
brglm2 vs lstar
A side-by-side editorial comparison of brglm2 and lstar — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
brglm2 vs lstar: at a glance
What is brglm2?
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
What is lstar?
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
brglm2 vs lstar: editorial side-by-side
brglm2
0.0ANALYTICS
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
◆ Current state
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's older work assumed the classical regime where observations comfortably outnumber parameters. mdyplFit() and its hd_correction argument target the opposite case, and the follow-up releases are almost entirely about it — Pearson residuals on original responses, aliased parameter handling, the sloe() signal-strength estimator ignoring leverage-one observations. Meanwhile the older surface gets graceful-failure work: brglm_fit() now returns its latest estimates with warnings rather than aborting.
◆ Prediction
Given that 1.0.1 and 1.1.0 are both dominated by mdyplFit follow-ups while the classical path receives only robustness fixes, further work on high-dimensional corrections is the likeliest direction.
lstar
5.0ANALYTICS
A single-cell data store commits to Zarr v3 and range-readable hosting across four language surfaces
◆ Current state
lstar stores single-cell data behind one C++ core with Python, R and JS/WASM bindings, and ships a browser viewer that reads the store directly. Zarr v3 is now the default on-disk format across all four surfaces, with zstd compression and sharding that packs many chunks into fewer objects. Viewer stores are compressed per field and resolved at chunk granularity, so a hosted viewer fetches only what it displays. The tag stream carries both lstar and lstar-sc releases.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is making a hosted store cheap to read. Sharding addresses the file-per-chunk explosion that makes many-chunk arrays awkward to host; per-field compression with chunk-granular resolution means colouring an embedding by one gene fetches one column rather than an array. The 0.2.x patches are the cost of maintaining four surfaces at once — a WASM heap crash that only browsers exercise, and a count-basis orientation defect where all three surfaces normalized in memory and none owned the on-disk layout.
◆ Prediction
The orientation bug's root cause — no surface owning the on-disk representation while all three normalized in memory — is the kind of gap that usually produces a validation or ownership change rather than another point fix.
Alternatives to brglm2 and lstar
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either brglm2 or lstar.
susier
Fine-mapping workhorse susieR spends its releases hunting null-effect trimming bugs
UCell
A rank-based gene signature scorer that has grown by adapting to whatever object format single-cell R uses next
detectseparation
A diagnostic package that generalized past its own name, then learned to say which kind of separation it found
bayestools
The JAGS toolkit under RoBMA, shipping the standardization machinery its downstream rewrite needed
robma
RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy
See all brglm2 alternatives → · See all lstar alternatives →
Recent activity from brglm2 and lstar
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 21d agolstarViewer count-basis orientation fixed; existing stores need re-prep
- 26d agolstarWASM viewer crash on resizable heaps fixed
- 1mo agolstarlstar 0.2.0 ⚡
- 1mo agolstarMeasure state inferred from content, not slot name
- 3mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.1.0
- 8mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.0.1
- 11mo agobrglm21.0.0 adds maximum DY-prior penalized likelihood for logistic regression ⚡
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.3
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.2
- 3y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between brglm2 and lstar?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is brglm2 better than lstar?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. lstar is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to brglm2?
Top brglm2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "brglm2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/brglm2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to lstar?
Top lstar alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "lstar alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/lstar for the full list with editorial commentary on each.