fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
brglm2 vs robma
A side-by-side editorial comparison of brglm2 and robma — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
brglm2 vs robma: at a glance
What is brglm2?
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
What is robma?
RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy
RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.
brglm2 vs robma: editorial side-by-side
brglm2
0.0ANALYTICS
A bias-reduction package reaches 1.0 by adding an estimator built for high-dimensional logistic regression
◆ Current state
brglm2 fits generalized linear models using mean and median bias reduction rather than plain maximum likelihood, which matters most when ML estimates are infinite or badly biased. The 0.7-0.9 line broadened coverage — negative binomial via brnb(), ordinal superiority measures, the expo() method for exponentiated parameters, add1()/drop1() so step() stops silently producing nonsense. Version 1.0.0 in August 2025 added mdyplFit(), estimating logistic regression by maximum Diaconis-Ylvisaker prior penalized likelihood with optional high-dimensional corrections. The two releases since have tuned that new path.
◆ Where it's heading
The package's older work assumed the classical regime where observations comfortably outnumber parameters. mdyplFit() and its hd_correction argument target the opposite case, and the follow-up releases are almost entirely about it — Pearson residuals on original responses, aliased parameter handling, the sloe() signal-strength estimator ignoring leverage-one observations. Meanwhile the older surface gets graceful-failure work: brglm_fit() now returns its latest estimates with warnings rather than aborting.
◆ Prediction
Given that 1.0.1 and 1.1.0 are both dominated by mdyplFit follow-ups while the classical path receives only robustness fixes, further work on high-dimensional corrections is the likeliest direction.
robma
0.0ANALYTICS
RoBMA 4.0 tears out its own constructor surface and rebuilds on one class hierarchy
◆ Current state
RoBMA fits robust Bayesian model-averaged meta-analyses that adjust for publication bias. The 3.x line grew by accretion: separate constructors for each model family (RoBMA.reg, NoBMA, BiBMA and their .reg variants), a spike-and-slab algorithm in 3.3.0 that made estimation fast enough to matter, then a steady stream of post-estimation tooling gated on that algorithm — heterogeneity summaries, residuals, funnel plots, z-curve conversion, predict, extract, pooled and adjusted effects. Version 4.0.0 in May 2026 collapses all of it into a unified brma class hierarchy.
◆ Where it's heading
The 3.x series solved the modeling problem and left an interface problem behind: a caller had to know which of six constructors matched their data type, and argument names differed across them. 4.0.0 resolves that by making the model family a set of arguments rather than a function name, and by standardizing input naming on metafor-style conventions. It shipped one day after BayesTools 0.3.0, the author's own upstream infrastructure package, whose new standardization and prior-transformation machinery this rewrite depends on.
◆ Prediction
A rewrite this wide usually needs a follow-up, so expect 4.0.x patches addressing migration gaps as users hit the removed constructors and renamed arguments.
Alternatives to brglm2 and robma
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either brglm2 or robma.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
See all brglm2 alternatives → · See all robma alternatives →
Recent activity from brglm2 and robma
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agorobmaUnifies six model constructors into one brma class hierarchy ⚡
- 3mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.1.0
- 8mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.1
- 8mo agobrglm2brglm2 v1.0.1
- 11mo agorobmaRoBMA 3.6.0
- 11mo agobrglm21.0.0 adds maximum DY-prior penalized likelihood for logistic regression ⚡
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.3
- 1y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.2
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.1
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.5.0
- 1y agorobmaRoBMA 3.4.0
- 3y agobrglm2brglm2 v0.9.1
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between brglm2 and robma?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. brglm2 and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is brglm2 better than robma?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. brglm2 and robma are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to brglm2?
Top brglm2 alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "brglm2 alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/brglm2 for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to robma?
Top robma alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "robma alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/robma for the full list with editorial commentary on each.