← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

httr vs withr

A side-by-side editorial comparison of httr and withr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:maintenance

httr vs withr: at a glance

Featurehttrwithr
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmaintenance, succession, http, deprecationstate-management, testing, performance, base-r
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is httr?

httr's last releases are housekeeping - the package now points users at httr2

httr is in wind-down. The last release with real feature work was 1.4.0 in 2018; everything since is test stabilization, CRAN-driven fixes, and unwinding a dependency on the httpbin service. Version 1.4.7 removed the vignette contents outright and redirects readers to httr2.

Read the full httr trajectory →

What is withr?

withr rebuilt defer() on base R's own on.exit(), and got much faster for it

withr provides the with_ and local_ functions that temporarily change global state and restore it on exit - the cleanup primitive under most of the tidyverse test suites. Version 3.0.0 reimplemented defer() as a thin wrapper over base::on.exit(), which the maintainers made possible by contributing the required arguments to R 3.5 itself. Everything since has been small correctness work.

Read the full withr trajectory →

httr vs withr: editorial side-by-side

H
httr
DEVOPS
0.0

httr's last releases are housekeeping - the package now points users at httr2

◆ Current state

httr is in wind-down. The last release with real feature work was 1.4.0 in 2018; everything since is test stabilization, CRAN-driven fixes, and unwinding a dependency on the httpbin service. Version 1.4.7 removed the vignette contents outright and redirects readers to httr2.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a succession, not a decline. The maintainers are keeping httr installable and passing checks for the very large base of packages that depend on it, while all design work happens in httr2. The pattern across these six releases is unambiguous: nothing lands here unless CRAN, a test service, or a platform forced it.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued patch releases driven only by CRAN checks and toolchain changes; the interesting HTTP work in R will keep landing in httr2.

W
withr
DEVOPS
0.0

withr rebuilt defer() on base R's own on.exit(), and got much faster for it

◆ Current state

withr provides the with_ and local_ functions that temporarily change global state and restore it on exit - the cleanup primitive under most of the tidyverse test suites. Version 3.0.0 reimplemented defer() as a thin wrapper over base::on.exit(), which the maintainers made possible by contributing the required arguments to R 3.5 itself. Everything since has been small correctness work.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc here is a package pushing its own machinery down into base R and then living off the result. Once defer() became on.exit(), the remaining work is about where cleanup is allowed to happen - knitr documents, source() calls, the global environment, session end - and about restoring state correctly when an expression exits early. Releases are now infrequent and CRAN-driven.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued low-volume releases fixing edge cases in where deferred handlers run; with the core delegated to base R, there is little left that would prompt a larger change.

Alternatives to httr and withr

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either httr or withr.

See all httr alternatives → · See all withr alternatives →

Recent activity from httr and withr

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agowithrlocal_seed() actually preserves the seed now
  2. 1y agowithrlocal_language() no longer warns when set to C
  3. 2y agowithrdefer() becomes a thin wrapper over base::on.exit()
  4. 2y agohttrVignettes removed and redirected to httr2
  5. 3y agohttrStops using the httpbin service in examples and tests
  6. 3y agohttrOut-of-band auth helper honors the rlang_interactive option
  7. 3y agohttrFixes an intermittent test failure
  8. 4y agowithrCleanup works inside Rmd and source(); with_() gains a getter
  9. 4y agowithrNew maintainer; handlers run at session end
  10. 5y agowithrlocal_options() can set NULL; with_seed() controls RNG kind
  11. 6y agohttrparse_url() follows RFC3986 for scheme parsing
  12. 7y agohttrDrops the Windows CA bundle override so curl uses schannel

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between httr and withr?

Both compete on the same themes — maintenance — within DevOps. httr and withr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is httr better than withr?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. httr and withr are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to httr?

Top httr alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "httr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/httr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to withr?

Top withr alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "withr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/withr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.