← Back to home
Comparison · DevOps

httr vs promises

A side-by-side editorial comparison of httr and promises — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

httr vs promises: at a glance

Featurehttrpromises
SectorDevOpsDevOps
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmaintenance, succession, http, deprecationasync, observability, performance, shiny
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is httr?

httr's last releases are housekeeping - the package now points users at httr2

httr is in wind-down. The last release with real feature work was 1.4.0 in 2018; everything since is test stabilization, CRAN-driven fixes, and unwinding a dependency on the httpbin service. Version 1.4.7 removed the vignette contents outright and redirects readers to httr2.

Read the full httr trajectory →

What is promises?

promises drops R6 for plain environments and wires async work into OpenTelemetry

promises supplies the async primitives behind Shiny and plumber. After years of small domain and future() fixes, the last two releases changed both what a promise costs and what it can report: 1.4.0 corrected nested domain ordering and added the first OpenTelemetry integration, and 1.5.0 replaced the R6 promise class with a classed environment while stabilizing the tracing API.

Read the full promises trajectory →

httr vs promises: editorial side-by-side

H
httr
DEVOPS
0.0

httr's last releases are housekeeping - the package now points users at httr2

◆ Current state

httr is in wind-down. The last release with real feature work was 1.4.0 in 2018; everything since is test stabilization, CRAN-driven fixes, and unwinding a dependency on the httpbin service. Version 1.4.7 removed the vignette contents outright and redirects readers to httr2.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a succession, not a decline. The maintainers are keeping httr installable and passing checks for the very large base of packages that depend on it, while all design work happens in httr2. The pattern across these six releases is unambiguous: nothing lands here unless CRAN, a test service, or a platform forced it.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued patch releases driven only by CRAN checks and toolchain changes; the interesting HTTP work in R will keep landing in httr2.

P
promises
DEVOPS
0.0

promises drops R6 for plain environments and wires async work into OpenTelemetry

◆ Current state

promises supplies the async primitives behind Shiny and plumber. After years of small domain and future() fixes, the last two releases changed both what a promise costs and what it can report: 1.4.0 corrected nested domain ordering and added the first OpenTelemetry integration, and 1.5.0 replaced the R6 promise class with a classed environment while stabilizing the tracing API.

◆ Where it's heading

Two things are being fixed at once. Promise domains - the mechanism that carries context across async boundaries - have been the source of nearly every bug in this window, and they are now being used deliberately as the vehicle for tracing rather than just for error handling. Meanwhile the object itself is being made cheap enough to create in volume.

◆ Prediction

Expect the OpenTelemetry surface to lose its experimental label and pick up the same span coverage Shiny would need end to end; the deprecated ospan function names should be removed in a following release.

Alternatives to httr and promises

Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either httr or promises.

See all httr alternatives → · See all promises alternatives →

Recent activity from httr and promises

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 9mo agopromisesOpenTelemetry spans across async work; R6 dropped for environments
  2. 9mo agopromisesNested promise domains fixed; then() gains a tee argument
  3. 1y agopromisesRealigns future object creation with the future package
  4. 1y agopromisesFixes stack overflow on long promise chains
  5. 1y agopromisesFixes domains forgotten inside nested handlers
  6. 2y agohttrVignettes removed and redirected to httr2
  7. 3y agopromisesfuture_promise() returns early when workers are exhausted
  8. 3y agohttrStops using the httpbin service in examples and tests
  9. 3y agohttrOut-of-band auth helper honors the rlang_interactive option
  10. 3y agohttrFixes an intermittent test failure
  11. 6y agohttrparse_url() follows RFC3986 for scheme parsing
  12. 7y agohttrDrops the Windows CA bundle override so curl uses schannel

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between httr and promises?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. httr and promises are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is httr better than promises?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. httr and promises are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to httr?

Top httr alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "httr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/httr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to promises?

Top promises alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "promises alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/promises for the full list with editorial commentary on each.