← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

Element vs Gromox

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Element and Gromox — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Element vs Gromox: at a glance

FeatureElementGromox
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score5.02.5
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmatrix, open-source, messaging, mvvmgroupware, exchange-compatibility, ews, imap
Last editorial update5h ago21d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Element?

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

Read the full Element trajectory →

What is Gromox?

Gromox keeps closing the gap with Exchange one protocol surface at a time — this round it's IMAP flags and Outlook for Mac.

Gromox ships a numbered release roughly monthly, each a mix of Exchange-protocol enhancements and fixes across emsmdb, EWS, IMAP, and the store layer. Version 3.10 makes midb synchronize IMAP message flags to and from the mailbox so they survive deletion of midb.sqlite3, adds IMAP keyword support, teaches EWS the Outlook-for-Mac smart response draft types, extends FindPeople and GetUserPhoto to personal contacts, and adds a short-TTL cache for recurring user ID and group membership lookups.

Read the full Gromox trajectory →

Element vs Gromox: editorial side-by-side

E
Element
COMMS
5.0

Element rebuilds its timeline with MVVM architecture while cutting legacy OS support in v1.12.28.

◆ Current state

Element, the open-source Matrix messaging client, ships on a stable two-week release cadence and is currently at v1.12.28. The project is mid-way through a multi-part Timeline MVVM refactor (parts 1 and 2 in v1.12.26 and v1.12.27), restructuring the core room timeline component. The v1.12.28 release raises the minimum glibc requirement to 2.34, ending support for Debian bullseye and Ubuntu releases older than 22.04.

◆ Where it's heading

The Timeline MVVM series is the defining architectural investment of this window — replacing the legacy timeline rendering with a proper view-model separation. This is foundational work that typically precedes faster feature delivery on the timeline surface (thread UX, call integration, richer message types). Parallel work promoting Custom Themes to devtools and updating bundle configurations signals cleanup of the extension and theming surface alongside the core refactor.

◆ Prediction

A Timeline MVVM part 3 or final integration is the immediate next step; once complete, expect improved thread UX or voice/video call timeline integration as the first beneficiaries of the new architecture.

G
Gromox
COMMS
2.5

Gromox keeps closing the gap with Exchange one protocol surface at a time — this round it's IMAP flags and Outlook for Mac.

◆ Current state

Gromox ships a numbered release roughly monthly, each a mix of Exchange-protocol enhancements and fixes across emsmdb, EWS, IMAP, and the store layer. Version 3.10 makes midb synchronize IMAP message flags to and from the mailbox so they survive deletion of midb.sqlite3, adds IMAP keyword support, teaches EWS the Outlook-for-Mac smart response draft types, extends FindPeople and GetUserPhoto to personal contacts, and adds a short-TTL cache for recurring user ID and group membership lookups.

◆ Where it's heading

The project is methodically completing Microsoft's protocol surface rather than building an alternative one. EWS went from partial handlers in 3.2 to the full meeting, delegate, and task surface in 3.6, and now picks up client-specific dialects like Outlook for Mac's draft types. IMAP is on the same path — keywords and colour categories in 3.8, IMAP4rev2 pieces, and now flag durability. Meanwhile the store layer keeps being split and cached for operability. The audience is clearly administrators migrating off Exchange or Kopano who need existing clients to behave unchanged.

◆ Prediction

Expect IMAP4rev2 coverage to keep filling in and more client-specific EWS dialects to appear as particular Outlook builds are tested against it.

Alternatives to Element and Gromox

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Element or Gromox.

See all Element alternatives → · See all Gromox alternatives →

Recent activity from Element and Gromox

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 11h agoElementElement v1.12.28: glibc 2.34 minimum, drops Debian bullseye
  2. 7d agoElementElement Banner module v2.0.0
  3. 7d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.1
  4. 7d agoElementElement v1.12.28-rc.0
  5. 15d agoElementElement v1.12.27: Timeline MVVM part 2
  6. 19d agoElementElement v1.12.27-rc.1
  7. 25d agoGromox3.10 makes IMAP flags durable and teaches EWS Outlook for Mac's drafts
  8. 1mo agoGromox3.9 makes room bookings and EWS meetings properly actionable
  9. 2mo agoGromox3.8 splits the Information Store per store and extends IMAP
  10. 4mo agoGromox3.7 fixes shared calendars, EWS fields and Thunderbird discovery
  11. 5mo agoGromox3.6 lands the full EWS meeting, delegate and task surface
  12. 6mo agoGromox3.5 adds per-service listen directives and fixes notifications

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Element and Gromox?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Element better than Gromox?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Element is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 5.0 vs 2.5), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Element?

Top Element alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-web for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Gromox?

Top Gromox alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Gromox alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/gromox for the full list with editorial commentary on each.