My Hours
My Hours launches a Claude MCP connector, making AI-driven time logging a first-class workflow
Comparison · PM
Fibery vs OpenProject
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fibery and OpenProject — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:mcpproject-management
Fibery vs OpenProject: at a glance
What is Fibery?
Fibery's Custom Apps go GA, completing its turn from work tracker to embedded app platform
Fibery spent the past quarter building and shipping Custom Apps — AI-generated mini-apps buildable inside the platform via Claude, ChatGPT, or MCP. Custom Apps launched publicly in mid-August after two months of experimental iteration. In the same period, Fibery added AI-driven automation creation, a usage dashboard tracking AI and integration consumption, and expanded MCP coverage to rich text editing and direct Custom Apps authoring. The platform is shipping weekly with a mix of headliner features and steady bug fixing.
What is OpenProject?
OpenProject's MCP Server gains write access — AI agents can now create tasks, add comments, and manage relations.
OpenProject 17.8.0 marks the most significant AI integration milestone in the product's history: the MCP Server can now create and update work packages, add comments, and manage relations — moving from a read-only query layer to a write-capable AI agent interface. The same release adds multiple target versions per work package, sprints and milestones to the project timeline, and relation display in the free Community edition. OpenProject 17.7.0 laid the organizational management foundation: departments, work-related user attributes, and individual work schedules for capacity planning.
Fibery vs OpenProject: editorial side-by-side
Fibery
6.3PM
Fibery's Custom Apps go GA, completing its turn from work tracker to embedded app platform
◆ Current state
Fibery spent the past quarter building and shipping Custom Apps — AI-generated mini-apps buildable inside the platform via Claude, ChatGPT, or MCP. Custom Apps launched publicly in mid-August after two months of experimental iteration. In the same period, Fibery added AI-driven automation creation, a usage dashboard tracking AI and integration consumption, and expanded MCP coverage to rich text editing and direct Custom Apps authoring. The platform is shipping weekly with a mix of headliner features and steady bug fixing.
◆ Where it's heading
Fibery is repositioning from a flexible project tracker into a platform where teams build custom tooling on top of their own data, without leaving the workspace. The Custom Apps launch — AI-generated, embeddable in documents, now on a versioned platform — is the clearest statement of that direction. MCP integration at multiple layers (rich text, apps, automations) shows Fibery making itself a first-class target in AI-native workflows rather than bolting on a chat widget.
◆ Prediction
The next likely move is tying Custom Apps directly into Fibery's automation engine — AI-built apps that trigger and respond to automations — which would close the loop between the platform's two main new capability axes. The breaking platform update to Custom Apps in September signals further architectural changes are coming before the feature stabilizes.
OpenProject's MCP Server gains write access — AI agents can now create tasks, add comments, and manage relations.
◆ Current state
OpenProject 17.8.0 marks the most significant AI integration milestone in the product's history: the MCP Server can now create and update work packages, add comments, and manage relations — moving from a read-only query layer to a write-capable AI agent interface. The same release adds multiple target versions per work package, sprints and milestones to the project timeline, and relation display in the free Community edition. OpenProject 17.7.0 laid the organizational management foundation: departments, work-related user attributes, and individual work schedules for capacity planning.
◆ Where it's heading
The two-track development pattern is clear: broader project management capabilities for enterprises (resource management, capacity planning, PM² methodology support) and a rapidly maturing AI interface through the MCP Server. The progression from read-only MCP to write-capable MCP is a qualitative shift — AI assistants become active project participants rather than passive query tools. The XWiki integration in 17.6.0 shows the platform also extending into enterprise knowledge management.
◆ Prediction
The logical next step is workflow automation via the MCP Server — AI agents that can trigger status transitions, query resource availability from the 17.7.0 capacity data, or auto-assign work packages based on department membership. The data model is in place; the automation layer is the missing piece.
Alternatives to Fibery and OpenProject
Other PM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fibery or OpenProject.
SmartSuite
SmartSuite ships viewer-interactive linked record filters and conditional automation branching in rapid succession.
NocoBase
NocoBase adds authenticated knowledge base retrieval to its AI workflow layer.
RentRedi
RentRedi's AI maintenance helper is the product's first step toward intelligent property operations.
Hive
Hive is quietly maturing Buzz AI from a novelty into operational workflow infrastructure, adding OAuth sharing and capacity-aware planning.
Asana
Asana ships HIPAA for Gov and deepens AI-assisted rule management while completing its rich-text document overhaul.
See all Fibery alternatives → · See all OpenProject alternatives →
Recent activity from Fibery and OpenProject
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 17h agoFiberyHierarchical filter improvements and whiteboard color coding
- 7d agoFiberySeptember 3, 2026 / Custom Apps updates, Set a load limit for Lists and Tables on Entity View, Multi-window support in the desktop app
- 9d agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.8.0 ⚡
- 14d agoFiberyAugust 27, 2026 / Usage dashboard, manually edit custom apps
- 21d agoFiberyAugust 20, 2026 / Batch undo, create automations with AI, Views history
- 28d agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.7.2: bug fix release
- 28d agoFiberyAugust 13, 2026 / Custom Apps, See how each change was made (UI, API, automation, AI) ⚡
- 1mo agoFiberyAugust 6, 2026 / Custom Apps improvements, Convert Select field to Database, Update small part of rich text and add comments via MCP
- 1mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.7.1: bug fix release
- 1mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.7.0
- 2mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.6.0
- 2mo agoOpenProjectOpenProject 17.5.1: bug fix release
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Fibery and OpenProject?
Both compete on the same themes — mcp, project-management — within PM. Fibery and OpenProject are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Fibery better than OpenProject?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fibery and OpenProject are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other PM products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Fibery?
Top Fibery alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fibery alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fibery for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to OpenProject?
Top OpenProject alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "OpenProject alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/openproject for the full list with editorial commentary on each.