← Back to home
Comparison · PM

Fibery vs Ganttic

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Fibery and Ganttic — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Fibery vs Ganttic: at a glance

FeatureFiberyGanttic
SectorPMPM
Velocity score6.35.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themeswork-management, custom-apps, mcp, ai-automationresource scheduling, project management, mobile app, audit logging
Last editorial update4d ago3mo ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Fibery?

Fibery's Custom Apps go GA, completing its turn from work tracker to embedded app platform

Fibery spent the past quarter building and shipping Custom Apps — AI-generated mini-apps buildable inside the platform via Claude, ChatGPT, or MCP. Custom Apps launched publicly in mid-August after two months of experimental iteration. In the same period, Fibery added AI-driven automation creation, a usage dashboard tracking AI and integration consumption, and expanded MCP coverage to rich text editing and direct Custom Apps authoring. The platform is shipping weekly with a mix of headliner features and steady bug fixing.

Read the full Fibery trajectory →

What is Ganttic?

Ganttic's feed is mostly blog and case studies, with one real shipped update: mobile redesign and view tracking.

Most crawled entries are Ganttic's content-marketing blog and customer case studies, but the feed also carries genuine product updates — the Q1 roundup of the redesigned Planner mobile app, task coloring, a Single Project Gantt View, and an expanded History Log. So the picture is mixed: heavy editorial output around resource scheduling, with occasional real release notes mixed in. Where the product moves, it is sharpening mobile usability and change-tracking transparency.

Read the full Ganttic trajectory →

Fibery vs Ganttic: editorial side-by-side

F6.3

Fibery's Custom Apps go GA, completing its turn from work tracker to embedded app platform

◆ Current state

Fibery spent the past quarter building and shipping Custom Apps — AI-generated mini-apps buildable inside the platform via Claude, ChatGPT, or MCP. Custom Apps launched publicly in mid-August after two months of experimental iteration. In the same period, Fibery added AI-driven automation creation, a usage dashboard tracking AI and integration consumption, and expanded MCP coverage to rich text editing and direct Custom Apps authoring. The platform is shipping weekly with a mix of headliner features and steady bug fixing.

◆ Where it's heading

Fibery is repositioning from a flexible project tracker into a platform where teams build custom tooling on top of their own data, without leaving the workspace. The Custom Apps launch — AI-generated, embeddable in documents, now on a versioned platform — is the clearest statement of that direction. MCP integration at multiple layers (rich text, apps, automations) shows Fibery making itself a first-class target in AI-native workflows rather than bolting on a chat widget.

◆ Prediction

The next likely move is tying Custom Apps directly into Fibery's automation engine — AI-built apps that trigger and respond to automations — which would close the loop between the platform's two main new capability axes. The breaking platform update to Custom Apps in September signals further architectural changes are coming before the feature stabilizes.

G5.0

Ganttic's feed is mostly blog and case studies, with one real shipped update: mobile redesign and view tracking.

◆ Current state

Most crawled entries are Ganttic's content-marketing blog and customer case studies, but the feed also carries genuine product updates — the Q1 roundup of the redesigned Planner mobile app, task coloring, a Single Project Gantt View, and an expanded History Log. So the picture is mixed: heavy editorial output around resource scheduling, with occasional real release notes mixed in. Where the product moves, it is sharpening mobile usability and change-tracking transparency.

◆ Where it's heading

The observable product thread is incremental polish: better mobile planning, more granular audit/history logging, and clearer views. The blog and case studies (ports, labs, construction) signal a push toward operations-heavy, equipment-and-people scheduling verticals. Expect continued usability and transparency refinements rather than category-redefining moves.

◆ Prediction

The next releases likely continue the mobile and history-log line and lean further into resource-heavy verticals. The blog's AI-resource-management posts hint at AI features, but no shipped AI capability is visible yet.

Alternatives to Fibery and Ganttic

Other PM products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Fibery or Ganttic.

See all Fibery alternatives → · See all Ganttic alternatives →

Recent activity from Fibery and Ganttic

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5d agoFiberyHierarchical filter improvements and whiteboard color coding
  2. 12d agoFiberySeptember 3, 2026 / Custom Apps updates, Set a load limit for Lists and Tables on Entity View, Multi-window support in the desktop app
  3. 19d agoFiberyAugust 27, 2026 / Usage dashboard, manually edit custom apps
  4. 26d agoFiberyAugust 20, 2026 / Batch undo, create automations with AI, Views history
  5. 1mo agoFiberyAugust 13, 2026 / Custom Apps, See how each change was made (UI, API, automation, AI)
  6. 1mo agoFiberyAugust 6, 2026 / Custom Apps improvements, Convert Select field to Database, Update small part of rich text and add comments via MCP
  7. 3mo agoGantticMastering Lab Resource Scheduling: A Success Story from Aristotle University’s LAT
  8. 3mo agoGantticCharting a Course Through Growth: How the Port of Hanko Navigates European Shipping with Ganttic
  9. 4mo agoGantticGantt Chart vs Timeline: Which Is Better for Your Projects?
  10. 4mo agoGantticWorkplace Capacity Planning: How to Drive Agility in Uncertain Times
  11. 4mo agoGantticWhat is AI-powered resource management and does your team actually need it?
  12. 5mo agoGantticQ1 Updates from Ganttic: Enhancing Transparency Across Web and Mobile App

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Fibery and Ganttic?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Fibery is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Fibery better than Ganttic?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Fibery is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other PM products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Fibery?

Top Fibery alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Fibery alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fibery for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Ganttic?

Top Ganttic alternatives in PM are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Ganttic alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ganttic for the full list with editorial commentary on each.