← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

enpls vs treeshap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of enpls and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

enpls vs treeshap: at a glance

Featureenplstreeshap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themespartial-least-squares, ensemble-learning, chemometrics, maintenance-modeshap, model explainability, tree ensembles, r package
Last editorial update1h ago9h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is enpls?

enpls has not changed its statistics since 2016 — only its website, twice.

enpls implements ensemble partial least squares regression, with variants for feature selection, outlier detection and model applicability. Across the six most recent releases there is not one change to the modeling code. They cover a documentation website, a website URL change, a font stack, code indentation, a CI service, and most recently a GitHub Actions migration with an R CMD check note fix.

Read the full enpls trajectory →

What is treeshap?

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

Read the full treeshap trajectory →

enpls vs treeshap: editorial side-by-side

E
enpls
ANALYTICS
0.0

enpls has not changed its statistics since 2016 — only its website, twice.

◆ Current state

enpls implements ensemble partial least squares regression, with variants for feature selection, outlier detection and model applicability. Across the six most recent releases there is not one change to the modeling code. They cover a documentation website, a website URL change, a font stack, code indentation, a CI service, and most recently a GitHub Actions migration with an R CMD check note fix.

◆ Where it's heading

The statistical work finished around version 5.6, which added cross-validation fold control and fixed component selection when the maximum was left unspecified. Everything since has kept the package installable and its docs online. The 2025 release arriving the same day as sibling package grex, with the same two fixes, confirms the pattern: these are maintainer sweeps across a portfolio, not attention to enpls specifically.

◆ Prediction

The next release will almost certainly be another CRAN or tooling fix. Six consecutive infrastructure-only releases across nine years give no basis for expecting new methods.

T
treeshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

◆ Current state

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.

Alternatives to enpls and treeshap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either enpls or treeshap.

See all enpls alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →

Recent activity from enpls and treeshap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agotreeshapGPBoost support lands; xgboost adapter repaired
  2. 1y agoenplsenpls 6.1.1 moves pkgdown to GitHub Actions
  3. 2y agotreeshapFixes broken lightgbm.unify examples
  4. 2y agotreeshapMulti-output model explanations added
  5. 2y agotreeshapFirst CRAN release consolidates the unify() adapters
  6. 7y agoenplsenpls 6.1 adopts tidyverse code style
  7. 8y agoenplsenpls 6.0 changes the documentation URL
  8. 8y agoenplsenpls 5.9 drops Google Fonts from vignettes
  9. 9y agoenplsenpls 5.8 updates gallery images, enables HTTPS
  10. 9y agoenplsenpls 5.7 adds a pkgdown site and Windows CI

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between enpls and treeshap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. enpls and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is enpls better than treeshap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. enpls and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to enpls?

Top enpls alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "enpls alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/enpls for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treeshap?

Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.