qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of quantities and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
The glue package that makes R carry units and uncertainty through the same calculation.
quantities combines the units and errors packages into one class so values keep both their measurement units and their uncertainty through arithmetic, subsetting and data frame operations. Recent releases have been narrow: fixes to the covariance and correlation implementations, and performance work on the data.frame methods. Most of the release traffic is coordination with its two parent packages.
treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.
treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.
quantities combines the units and errors packages into one class so values keep both their measurement units and their uncertainty through arithmetic, subsetting and data frame operations. Recent releases have been narrow: fixes to the covariance and correlation implementations, and performance work on the data.frame methods. Most of the release traffic is coordination with its two parent packages.
The design settled with 0.2.0, which made uncertainty unit-aware and added correlation and covariance support for quantities objects. Since then the package behaves like the integration layer it is — releasing when units, errors, dplyr or ggplot2 shift underneath it rather than on its own schedule. Several releases consist only of test repairs against upstream changes.
Expect the next release to follow a units or errors change rather than introduce new behaviour of its own.
treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.
The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.
Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either quantities or treeshap.
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
See all quantities alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. quantities and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. quantities and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top quantities alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "quantities alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/quantities for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.