← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

tern.rbmi vs treeshap

A side-by-side editorial comparison of tern.rbmi and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

tern.rbmi vs treeshap: at a glance

Featuretern.rbmitreeshap
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themespharmaverse, multiple-imputation, cran-maintenance, tabulationshap, model explainability, tree ensembles, r package
Last editorial update1h ago10h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is tern.rbmi?

Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.

tern.rbmi renders the output of {rbmi} reference-based multiple imputation analyses into tern tables for clinical reporting. Its three most recent releases exist to satisfy CRAN: restricting vignette builds to gcc, adding V8 to Suggests, and a plain resubmission. No user-facing functionality has changed in the visible window, and the three older entries now backfilled are version-bump automation.

Read the full tern.rbmi trajectory →

What is treeshap?

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

Read the full treeshap trajectory →

tern.rbmi vs treeshap: editorial side-by-side

T
tern.rbmi
ANALYTICS
0.0

Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.

◆ Current state

tern.rbmi renders the output of {rbmi} reference-based multiple imputation analyses into tern tables for clinical reporting. Its three most recent releases exist to satisfy CRAN: restricting vignette builds to gcc, adding V8 to Suggests, and a plain resubmission. No user-facing functionality has changed in the visible window, and the three older entries now backfilled are version-bump automation.

◆ Where it's heading

This is a thin adapter package and behaves like one — it moves when CRAN or an upstream dependency forces it to. Between 2022 and 2024 the feed shows only version bumps, and the 2025 releases are packaging concerns rather than analysis changes. The newly surfaced 2022 entries reinforce rather than change that reading.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to be triggered by a CRAN check failure or an {rbmi} update rather than by new tabulation features.

T
treeshap
ANALYTICS
0.0

treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.

◆ Current state

treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.

◆ Where it's heading

The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.

Alternatives to tern.rbmi and treeshap

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either tern.rbmi or treeshap.

See all tern.rbmi alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →

Recent activity from tern.rbmi and treeshap

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 3mo agotreeshapGPBoost support lands; xgboost adapter repaired
  2. 1y agotern.rbmiVignette built only under gcc
  3. 1y agotern.rbmiV8 added to Suggests
  4. 1y agotern.rbmiCRAN resubmission with dependency and workflow updates
  5. 2y agotreeshapFixes broken lightgbm.unify examples
  6. 2y agotreeshapMulti-output model explanations added
  7. 2y agotreeshapFirst CRAN release consolidates the unify() adapters
  8. 3y agotern.rbmiAutomated release commit for 0.1.1
  9. 4y agotern.rbmiDevelopment version bump to 0.1.0.9004
  10. 4y agotern.rbmiCI automation commit, no release content

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between tern.rbmi and treeshap?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. tern.rbmi and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is tern.rbmi better than treeshap?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tern.rbmi and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to tern.rbmi?

Top tern.rbmi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tern.rbmi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tern-rbmi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to treeshap?

Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.