qqman
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
A side-by-side editorial comparison of symengine and treeshap — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
An R symbolic-maths binding whose changelog is really the C++ core's release notes.
symengine gives R access to the SymEngine computer algebra core for symbolic expressions, matrices and sets. The tracked feed carries the upstream C++ library's releases rather than R-binding changes, so what shows here is core work: parser fixes, locale-independent double parsing, an SOVERSION bump and matrix transpose corrections. Feature growth in the core has slowed considerably since the 0.9 and 0.10 releases.
treeshap keeps widening its tree-model coverage while the SHAP math stays put.
treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.
symengine gives R access to the SymEngine computer algebra core for symbolic expressions, matrices and sets. The tracked feed carries the upstream C++ library's releases rather than R-binding changes, so what shows here is core work: parser fixes, locale-independent double parsing, an SOVERSION bump and matrix transpose corrections. Feature growth in the core has slowed considerably since the 0.9 and 0.10 releases.
The upstream core has moved from adding capability — serialization, a first simplify(), set types, matrix expressions, LLVM support — toward maintenance: build fixes, dependency support such as Flint3, and correctness patches. For R users the practical consequence is that new symbolic features arrive only as fast as the binding exposes them, which this feed does not report on.
Expect further upstream maintenance releases tracking LLVM and Flint versions; nothing in these notes signals a new capability push.
treeshap computes exact SHAP values for tree ensembles in R, reaching each modelling framework through a per-framework unify() adapter. Since returning to CRAN in 2023 it has added GPBoost, ranger survival forests and multi-output models to that adapter layer. Four releases in three years, each dominated by adapter work contributed by users of one specific framework.
The direction is breadth of model support rather than new explanation methods: every release since the first CRAN submission adds or repairs a unify() backend. Maintenance is community-driven, with named contributors fixing the framework they personally use. Nothing in these entries points at work on the SHAP algorithms themselves.
Expect the next release to add or repair another unify() adapter as a contributor brings their own framework, rather than to change how explanations are computed.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either symengine or treeshap.
The Manhattan-plot package for GWAS results, finished and dormant since 2017.
The R package for CODATA constants rebuilt its symbol table on NIST's naming so future updates stop being hand work.
The R client for AusTraits spends its releases chasing the dataset it reads.
A ggplot2 layer for seasonal adjustment output, filling in one plot type at a time.
A fossil-record simulator that quietly grew a trait-evolution engine.
Reference-based multiple imputation tables, shipping only what CRAN checks demand.
See all symengine alternatives → · See all treeshap alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. symengine and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. symengine and treeshap are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top symengine alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "symengine alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/symengine-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top treeshap alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "treeshap alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/treeshap for the full list with editorial commentary on each.