mlr3proba
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
A side-by-side editorial comparison of bonsai and probably — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
bonsai keeps widening tidymodels' boosted-tree engine bench, catboost most recently
bonsai exists to attach non-core tree engines to parsnip's boost_tree() and rand_forest(), and the release history reads as a steady accumulation of them: partykit, aorsf, lightgbm, and now catboost. The 0.4.x line is spent making catboost behave like a full tidymodels citizen rather than adding anything new.
The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
bonsai exists to attach non-core tree engines to parsnip's boost_tree() and rand_forest(), and the release history reads as a steady accumulation of them: partykit, aorsf, lightgbm, and now catboost. The 0.4.x line is spent making catboost behave like a full tidymodels citizen rather than adding anything new.
Each engine follows the same arc — land it, then close the gaps that keep it from tuning cleanly (parameter naming, multi_predict, threading, case weights). Recent work is squarely in that second phase for catboost, with dials supplying the matching parameter objects on its own release schedule. Bug-fix density is high relative to new surface.
Expect the catboost integration to keep filling in tuning and GPU-related arguments before any further engine is added; the entries give no signal about which engine would come next.
probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.
The recent releases are about making these objects survive leaving the session. butcher and required_pkgs() methods are what a model needs to be pinned, containerised and served, and their arrival alongside workflows adding a tailor postprocessing stage and vetiver adding probably support points the same way: calibration is being moved out of analysis scripts and into the deployed pipeline. The cal_*_none() reference implementations are the tell that calibration is now something people tune rather than apply once.
Expect the calibration functions to be reachable directly from a tuned workflow's postprocessing stage rather than applied to predictions afterwards, following the tailor integration that workflows just shipped.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bonsai or probably.
mlr3proba is shedding weight as its survival work moves into sibling packages
mlr3viz keeps the ecosystem's plots working while the plots themselves move out
mlr3tuning is rebuilding its async machinery under a stable public surface
timetk swallowed anomalize whole, then went quiet for two years
modelbased is turning marginal effects into a full contrast grammar
easystats' parameters package absorbs one more model class every few weeks
See all bonsai alternatives → · See all probably alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
Both compete on the same themes — tidymodels — within Analytics. bonsai and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bonsai and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top bonsai alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bonsai alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bonsai-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top probably alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probably alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probably for the full list with editorial commentary on each.