← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

bonsai vs probably

A side-by-side editorial comparison of bonsai and probably — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:tidymodels

bonsai vs probably: at a glance

Featurebonsaiprobably
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestidymodels, gradient-boosting, engines, lightgbmcalibration, conformal-inference, tidymodels, uncertainty
Last editorial update5h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is bonsai?

bonsai keeps widening tidymodels' boosted-tree engine bench, catboost most recently

bonsai exists to attach non-core tree engines to parsnip's boost_tree() and rand_forest(), and the release history reads as a steady accumulation of them: partykit, aorsf, lightgbm, and now catboost. The 0.4.x line is spent making catboost behave like a full tidymodels citizen rather than adding anything new.

Read the full bonsai trajectory →

What is probably?

The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.

probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.

Read the full probably trajectory →

bonsai vs probably: editorial side-by-side

B
bonsai
ANALYTICS
0.0

bonsai keeps widening tidymodels' boosted-tree engine bench, catboost most recently

◆ Current state

bonsai exists to attach non-core tree engines to parsnip's boost_tree() and rand_forest(), and the release history reads as a steady accumulation of them: partykit, aorsf, lightgbm, and now catboost. The 0.4.x line is spent making catboost behave like a full tidymodels citizen rather than adding anything new.

◆ Where it's heading

Each engine follows the same arc — land it, then close the gaps that keep it from tuning cleanly (parameter naming, multi_predict, threading, case weights). Recent work is squarely in that second phase for catboost, with dials supplying the matching parameter objects on its own release schedule. Bug-fix density is high relative to new surface.

◆ Prediction

Expect the catboost integration to keep filling in tuning and GPU-related arguments before any further engine is added; the entries give no signal about which engine would come next.

P
probably
ANALYTICS
0.0

The package that made calibration a step instead of an afterthought.

◆ Current state

probably started as a small utility for class predictions and equivocal zones, and version 1.0.0 turned it into tidymodels' calibration and uncertainty package: cal_plot_*, cal_estimate_*, cal_validate_* and cal_apply across binary, multiclass and regression problems, plus conformal prediction intervals. Since then the work has been consolidation — a large internal refactor with no API change, split conformal and conformal quantile regression, bound_prediction(), and required_pkgs() and butcher methods so conformal objects can be deployed and stripped.

◆ Where it's heading

The recent releases are about making these objects survive leaving the session. butcher and required_pkgs() methods are what a model needs to be pinned, containerised and served, and their arrival alongside workflows adding a tailor postprocessing stage and vetiver adding probably support points the same way: calibration is being moved out of analysis scripts and into the deployed pipeline. The cal_*_none() reference implementations are the tell that calibration is now something people tune rather than apply once.

◆ Prediction

Expect the calibration functions to be reachable directly from a tuned workflow's postprocessing stage rather than applied to predictions afterwards, following the tailor integration that workflows just shipped.

Alternatives to bonsai and probably

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either bonsai or probably.

See all bonsai alternatives → · See all probably alternatives →

Recent activity from bonsai and probably

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agobonsaicatboost gains multi_predict() and corrected tuning parameters
  2. 10mo agoprobablyConformal objects gain required_pkgs() and butcher methods
  3. 1y agoprobablyggplot2 test updates and a clearer validation-set error
  4. 1y agobonsaicatboost engine added to boost_tree()
  5. 1y agoprobablyCalibration internals refactored; isotonic bootstrap bug fixed
  6. 1y agobonsailightgbm accepts sparse matrices for fit and predict
  7. 2y agobonsaiaorsf fit failure in multisession workers fixed
  8. 2y agobonsaiaorsf engine added; lightgbm gains dataset params and case weights
  9. 2y agoprobablyFix grouping sensitivity to variable type
  10. 3y agoprobablySplit conformal and conformal quantile regression added
  11. 3y agoprobablyCalibration and conformal inference arrive in tidymodels
  12. 3y agobonsailightgbm num_leaves becomes tunable; alias arguments disallowed

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between bonsai and probably?

Both compete on the same themes — tidymodels — within Analytics. bonsai and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is bonsai better than probably?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. bonsai and probably are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to bonsai?

Top bonsai alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "bonsai alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/bonsai-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to probably?

Top probably alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probably alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probably for the full list with editorial commentary on each.