soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
b3gbi vs dissmapr
A side-by-side editorial comparison of b3gbi and dissmapr — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:biodiversityr package
b3gbi vs dissmapr: at a glance
What is b3gbi?
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
What is dissmapr?
dissmapr spent its first releases becoming citable rather than adding methods.
dissmapr provides an R workflow for compositional dissimilarity and turnover — occurrence data through spatial gridding and environmental linkage to order-wise dissimilarity and bioregional mapping. All three releases to date are infrastructure: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release aligning the package with the B-Cubed software development guide. The ten-function pipeline described in the notes has not changed across them.
b3gbi vs dissmapr: editorial side-by-side
b3gbi
2.5ANALYTICS
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
◆ Current state
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces are shaping releases. Internally, the uncertainty split produced an indicator-specific rule book — species-level indicators bootstrap the whole cube, raw counts resample within year, evenness gets a logit transform — and that rule book is where the statistical thinking now lives. Externally, GBIF's taxonomic backbone migration to the Catalogue of Life forced string taxon keys through process_cube() and the plotting paths, while recurring EEA and MGRS grid-code fixes mark coordinate parsing as the least settled area.
◆ Prediction
The 0.9.4 notes are entirely JOSS review items — contributors, examples, tracked datasets — so the next release is most likely a JOSS-accepted 1.0 rather than new indicator work.
dissmapr
0.0ANALYTICS
dissmapr spent its first releases becoming citable rather than adding methods.
◆ Current state
dissmapr provides an R workflow for compositional dissimilarity and turnover — occurrence data through spatial gridding and environmental linkage to order-wise dissimilarity and bioregional mapping. All three releases to date are infrastructure: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release aligning the package with the B-Cubed software development guide. The ten-function pipeline described in the notes has not changed across them.
◆ Where it's heading
The work is compliance-shaped rather than method-shaped: explicit @importFrom in place of whole-namespace imports, library() calls removed from package code, roughly 11 MB of development caches dropped, a runnable README quick-start, and Zenodo archival with CITATION.cff and codemeta.json. dissmapr moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling invasimapr — both tagged 0.1.0 within three minutes of each other and 0.2.0 on the same day — so releases here reflect project-wide standards deadlines more than package-specific work. The stated roadmap of additional ecological distance metrics has not yet landed.
◆ Prediction
With standards work now signed off and R CMD check clean, the next release is the first real chance for the roadmap items — additional ecological distance metrics — to arrive.
Alternatives to b3gbi and dissmapr
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either b3gbi or dissmapr.
collinear
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
See all b3gbi alternatives → · See all dissmapr alternatives →
Recent activity from b3gbi and dissmapr
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agob3gbiJOSS review fixes: contributors, examples, tracked data
- 1mo agodissmaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
- 1mo agob3gbiEEA grid coordinates no longer scaled by resolution
- 1mo agob3gbiadd_ci() no longer crashes on completeness indicators
- 1mo agodissmaprB-Cubed standards alignment, docs overhaul and a citable DOI
- 1mo agodissmaprdissmapr v0.1.0: First citable release
- 1mo agob3gbiString taxon keys for GBIF's Catalogue of Life backbone
- 1mo agob3gbiUncertainty split out of the indicator workflow into add_ci() ⚡
- 1mo agob3gbiFAIR column mapping doc and Zenodo DOI badge
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between b3gbi and dissmapr?
Both compete on the same themes — biodiversity, r package — within Analytics. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is b3gbi better than dissmapr?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to b3gbi?
Top b3gbi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "b3gbi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/b3gbi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to dissmapr?
Top dissmapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dissmapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dissmapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.