soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
dissmapr vs scTypeEval
A side-by-side editorial comparison of dissmapr and scTypeEval — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r package
dissmapr vs scTypeEval: at a glance
What is dissmapr?
dissmapr spent its first releases becoming citable rather than adding methods.
dissmapr provides an R workflow for compositional dissimilarity and turnover — occurrence data through spatial gridding and environmental linkage to order-wise dissimilarity and bioregional mapping. All three releases to date are infrastructure: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release aligning the package with the B-Cubed software development guide. The ten-function pipeline described in the notes has not changed across them.
What is scTypeEval?
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
scTypeEval evaluates the consistency of single-cell cell type annotations without a ground-truth reference, using pseudobulk distances, Wasserstein distances and reciprocal classification as alternative dissimilarity strategies. It cleared Bioconductor's submission process on its first cycle, moving from a 0.99.30 pre-release in April 2026 to version 1.0.0 in the Bioconductor 3.23 release a month later. It accepts matrix, Seurat and SingleCellExperiment inputs.
dissmapr vs scTypeEval: editorial side-by-side
dissmapr
0.0ANALYTICS
dissmapr spent its first releases becoming citable rather than adding methods.
◆ Current state
dissmapr provides an R workflow for compositional dissimilarity and turnover — occurrence data through spatial gridding and environmental linkage to order-wise dissimilarity and bioregional mapping. All three releases to date are infrastructure: a first citable archive in June 2026, then a maturity release aligning the package with the B-Cubed software development guide. The ten-function pipeline described in the notes has not changed across them.
◆ Where it's heading
The work is compliance-shaped rather than method-shaped: explicit @importFrom in place of whole-namespace imports, library() calls removed from package code, roughly 11 MB of development caches dropped, a runnable README quick-start, and Zenodo archival with CITATION.cff and codemeta.json. dissmapr moves in lockstep with its B-Cubed sibling invasimapr — both tagged 0.1.0 within three minutes of each other and 0.2.0 on the same day — so releases here reflect project-wide standards deadlines more than package-specific work. The stated roadmap of additional ecological distance metrics has not yet landed.
◆ Prediction
With standards work now signed off and R CMD check clean, the next release is the first real chance for the roadmap items — additional ecological distance metrics — to arrive.
scTypeEval
0.0ANALYTICS
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
◆ Current state
scTypeEval evaluates the consistency of single-cell cell type annotations without a ground-truth reference, using pseudobulk distances, Wasserstein distances and reciprocal classification as alternative dissimilarity strategies. It cleared Bioconductor's submission process on its first cycle, moving from a 0.99.30 pre-release in April 2026 to version 1.0.0 in the Bioconductor 3.23 release a month later. It accepts matrix, Seurat and SingleCellExperiment inputs.
◆ Where it's heading
The visible history is short and shaped entirely by the Bioconductor pipeline — the 0.99.x series is that project's submission convention, and 1.0.0 is what acceptance looks like rather than a maturity claim by the authors. What the pre-release notes emphasise is breadth of input format and of dissimilarity strategy rather than a single recommended method, which suggests the package is positioned as a comparison harness rather than a scoring tool. Nothing in these two entries indicates work beyond getting accepted.
◆ Prediction
With only a submission cycle in the record, there is not enough here to predict a direction; the next release will most likely be whatever the Bioconductor 3.24 cycle requires, and the first post-acceptance release is what will show whether development continues.
Alternatives to dissmapr and scTypeEval
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either dissmapr or scTypeEval.
collinear
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
fluxnet-package
fluxnet keeps swapping its own plumbing — first a Python downloader, now a DuckDB backend.
See all dissmapr alternatives → · See all scTypeEval alternatives →
Recent activity from dissmapr and scTypeEval
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 1mo agodissmaprVersion bump; notes identical to 0.2.0
- 1mo agodissmaprB-Cubed standards alignment, docs overhaul and a citable DOI
- 1mo agodissmaprdissmapr v0.1.0: First citable release
- 3mo agoscTypeEvalAccepted into the Bioconductor 3.23 release
- 4mo agoscTypeEvalBioconductor pre-release: ground-truth-agnostic annotation evaluation
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between dissmapr and scTypeEval?
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. dissmapr and scTypeEval are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is dissmapr better than scTypeEval?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. dissmapr and scTypeEval are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to dissmapr?
Top dissmapr alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "dissmapr alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/dissmapr for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to scTypeEval?
Top scTypeEval alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "scTypeEval alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/sctypeeval for the full list with editorial commentary on each.