soilDBdata
soilDBdata exists so soilDB's tests can run without a NASIS connection.
Comparison · Analytics
b3gbi vs collinear
A side-by-side editorial comparison of b3gbi and collinear — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r package
b3gbi vs collinear: at a glance
What is b3gbi?
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
What is collinear?
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.
b3gbi vs collinear: editorial side-by-side
b3gbi
2.5ANALYTICS
b3gbi pulled confidence intervals out of its indicator workflow and handed them to dubicube.
◆ Current state
b3gbi computes biodiversity indicators from GBIF occurrence cubes for the B-Cubed project, and sits at 0.9.4 in a JOSS review run-up. The 0.9 release decoupled uncertainty from indicator calculation: confidence intervals are no longer produced inline but added afterward with add_ci(), backed by whole-cube bootstrapping from the sibling dubicube package. Everything since has been grid-parsing and compatibility repair around that split.
◆ Where it's heading
Two forces are shaping releases. Internally, the uncertainty split produced an indicator-specific rule book — species-level indicators bootstrap the whole cube, raw counts resample within year, evenness gets a logit transform — and that rule book is where the statistical thinking now lives. Externally, GBIF's taxonomic backbone migration to the Catalogue of Life forced string taxon keys through process_cube() and the plotting paths, while recurring EEA and MGRS grid-code fixes mark coordinate parsing as the least settled area.
◆ Prediction
The 0.9.4 notes are entirely JOSS review items — contributors, examples, tracked datasets — so the next release is most likely a JOSS-accepted 1.0 rather than new indicator work.
collinear
0.0ANALYTICS
collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.
◆ Current state
collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.
◆ Where it's heading
The through-line is removing decisions the user was never well placed to make. Preference-order functions were renamed twice — first onto a metric-and-model scheme in 2.0.0, then onto a response-type scheme in 3.0.0 — and f_auto() picks one when none is given; target encoding went from automatic to opt-in; max_cor and max_vif now default to NULL and trigger a data-driven threshold derived from the 75th percentile of pairwise correlations through a sigmoid and a fitted correlation-to-VIF mapping. Each change is defensible and each one broke callers, which is the cost of this approach.
◆ Prediction
3.0.1 moved the example datasets out into a separate spatialData package and fixed four crashes rather than adding anything, so the next release is most likely more consolidation on the 3.0 surface than a fourth interface.
Alternatives to b3gbi and collinear
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either b3gbi or collinear.
nert
nert put fourteen TERN datasets behind one dispatcher and called it stable.
scTypeEval
scTypeEval judges single-cell annotations without needing a ground truth to judge them against.
medrobust
medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.
probmed
probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.
fluxnet-package
fluxnet keeps swapping its own plumbing — first a Python downloader, now a DuckDB backend.
See all b3gbi alternatives → · See all collinear alternatives →
Recent activity from b3gbi and collinear
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 4d agob3gbiJOSS review fixes: contributors, examples, tracked data
- 1mo agob3gbiEEA grid coordinates no longer scaled by resolution
- 1mo agob3gbiadd_ci() no longer crashes on completeness indicators
- 1mo agob3gbiString taxon keys for GBIF's Catalogue of Life backbone
- 1mo agob3gbiUncertainty split out of the indicator workflow into add_ci() ⚡
- 1mo agob3gbiFAIR column mapping doc and Zenodo DOI badge
- 3mo agocollinearNamespace, NA and sf fixes; example data moves to spatialData
- 8mo agocollinearAdaptive thresholds, multi-response support and a new output class ⚡
- 1y agocollinearCategorical responses, f_auto() defaults and future-based parallelism ⚡
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between b3gbi and collinear?
Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is b3gbi better than collinear?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. b3gbi is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to b3gbi?
Top b3gbi alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "b3gbi alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/b3gbi for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to collinear?
Top collinear alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "collinear alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/collinear for the full list with editorial commentary on each.