← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

collinear vs medrobust

A side-by-side editorial comparison of collinear and medrobust — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r package

collinear vs medrobust: at a glance

Featurecollinearmedrobust
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmulticollinearity, variable selection, vif, breaking changescausal mediation, partial identification, misclassification, sensitivity analysis
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is collinear?

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

Read the full collinear trajectory →

What is medrobust?

medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.

medrobust computes partial-identification bounds for mediation effects when exposure or mediator is differentially misclassified, part of the Data-Wise mediationverse. Its 0.2.0 release corrected three estimator defects against population oracles and added Imbens-Manski confidence intervals for the bounds; the two releases since have paired each identification path with a real public-domain dataset and a worked vignette. CRAN is deferred, with distribution through GitHub and r-universe.

Read the full medrobust trajectory →

collinear vs medrobust: editorial side-by-side

C
collinear
ANALYTICS
0.0

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

◆ Current state

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is removing decisions the user was never well placed to make. Preference-order functions were renamed twice — first onto a metric-and-model scheme in 2.0.0, then onto a response-type scheme in 3.0.0 — and f_auto() picks one when none is given; target encoding went from automatic to opt-in; max_cor and max_vif now default to NULL and trigger a data-driven threshold derived from the 75th percentile of pairwise correlations through a sigmoid and a fitted correlation-to-VIF mapping. Each change is defensible and each one broke callers, which is the cost of this approach.

◆ Prediction

3.0.1 moved the example datasets out into a separate spatialData package and fixed four crashes rather than adding anything, so the next release is most likely more consolidation on the 3.0 surface than a fourth interface.

M
medrobust
ANALYTICS
0.0

medrobust made its partial-identification bounds usable by giving them confidence intervals.

◆ Current state

medrobust computes partial-identification bounds for mediation effects when exposure or mediator is differentially misclassified, part of the Data-Wise mediationverse. Its 0.2.0 release corrected three estimator defects against population oracles and added Imbens-Manski confidence intervals for the bounds; the two releases since have paired each identification path with a real public-domain dataset and a worked vignette. CRAN is deferred, with distribution through GitHub and r-universe.

◆ Where it's heading

The pattern is deliberate and symmetric: 0.3.0 shipped the mediator-side example on NCHS natality data, 0.4.0 its exposure-side mirror on NHANES, each demonstrating what the bounds do when reporting accuracy is allowed to depend on the outcome. Alongside that runs a consistent concern with failing usefully rather than loudly — bound_ne() returns NA bounds with a machine-readable reason and a typed condition instead of aborting, so a simulation replicate is recorded rather than lost, and non-finite endpoint standard errors produce a documented NA rather than a silent one. That is a package expecting to be run thousands of times inside someone else's loop.

◆ Prediction

Both identification paths now have a dataset, a vignette and interval coverage, so the next release is most likely the deferred CRAN submission rather than new methodology.

Alternatives to collinear and medrobust

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either collinear or medrobust.

See all collinear alternatives → · See all medrobust alternatives →

Recent activity from collinear and medrobust

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agomedrobustNHANES exposure-side misclassification example dataset
  2. 2mo agomedrobustNatality example dataset; bounds degrade instead of aborting
  3. 2mo agomedrobustBounds corrected against oracles; Imbens-Manski intervals added
  4. 3mo agocollinearNamespace, NA and sf fixes; example data moves to spatialData
  5. 8mo agocollinearAdaptive thresholds, multi-response support and a new output class
  6. 1y agocollinearCategorical responses, f_auto() defaults and future-based parallelism

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between collinear and medrobust?

Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. collinear and medrobust are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is collinear better than medrobust?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. collinear and medrobust are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to collinear?

Top collinear alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "collinear alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/collinear for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to medrobust?

Top medrobust alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "medrobust alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/medrobust for the full list with editorial commentary on each.