← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

collinear vs probmed

A side-by-side editorial comparison of collinear and probmed — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r package

collinear vs probmed: at a glance

Featurecollinearprobmed
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmulticollinearity, variable selection, vif, breaking changescausal mediation, effect size, semiparametric inference, cross-fitting
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is collinear?

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

Read the full collinear trajectory →

What is probmed?

probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.

probmed computes P_med, a scale-free probabilistic effect size for causal mediation, as part of the Data-Wise mediationverse alongside medfit, medsim and RMediation. Three releases in three weeks took it from a single estimator to four additional families built on a shared cross-fitted corner-EIF core, covering gauge-calibrated, incremental-elasticity and Sobol variance-share versions of the proportion mediated. Distribution is GitHub and r-universe rather than CRAN, with a load-bearing Remotes pin on medfit.

Read the full probmed trajectory →

collinear vs probmed: editorial side-by-side

C
collinear
ANALYTICS
0.0

collinear has broken its API twice to stop making the user pick thresholds.

◆ Current state

collinear removes multicollinearity from predictor sets through pairwise correlation and VIF filtering, with a preference order deciding which variable survives each conflict. Two major versions in thirteen months each rewrote the interface: 2.0.0 extended every function to any combination of categorical and numeric responses and predictors, and 3.0.0 moved to multiple responses, restructured the output into classed objects, and made both filtering thresholds adaptive by default. Version 3.0.1 is the first release since that is purely repair.

◆ Where it's heading

The through-line is removing decisions the user was never well placed to make. Preference-order functions were renamed twice — first onto a metric-and-model scheme in 2.0.0, then onto a response-type scheme in 3.0.0 — and f_auto() picks one when none is given; target encoding went from automatic to opt-in; max_cor and max_vif now default to NULL and trigger a data-driven threshold derived from the 75th percentile of pairwise correlations through a sigmoid and a fitted correlation-to-VIF mapping. Each change is defensible and each one broke callers, which is the cost of this approach.

◆ Prediction

3.0.1 moved the example datasets out into a separate spatialData package and fixed four crashes rather than adding anything, so the next release is most likely more consolidation on the 3.0 surface than a fourth interface.

P
probmed
ANALYTICS
0.0

probmed went from one probabilistic effect size to a family of them in sixteen days.

◆ Current state

probmed computes P_med, a scale-free probabilistic effect size for causal mediation, as part of the Data-Wise mediationverse alongside medfit, medsim and RMediation. Three releases in three weeks took it from a single estimator to four additional families built on a shared cross-fitted corner-EIF core, covering gauge-calibrated, incremental-elasticity and Sobol variance-share versions of the proportion mediated. Distribution is GitHub and r-universe rather than CRAN, with a load-bearing Remotes pin on medfit.

◆ Where it's heading

The pace is manuscript-driven — estimators arrive with their citations attached and vignettes alongside, and the 0.1.0 notes correct the estimand itself against a manuscript definition rather than fixing a bug in code. Each release adds inference machinery as well as point estimates: percentile-bootstrap intervals and Fieller sets in 0.3.0, a deterministic MBCO interval in 0.2.0 that avoids resampling entirely. The gauge residual and the pmed_sensitivity() helper suggest a growing concern with when the estimand does not decompose at all.

◆ Prediction

0.3.0 shipped a sensitivity helper for shared mediator-outcome confounding and a diagnostic that flags non-decomposability, so the next release most likely extends that diagnostic side rather than adding a fifth estimator family.

Alternatives to collinear and probmed

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either collinear or probmed.

See all collinear alternatives → · See all probmed alternatives →

Recent activity from collinear and probmed

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 1mo agoprobmedFour estimator families on a cross-fitted corner-EIF core
  2. 2mo agoprobmedParallel mediators and a resampling-free MBCO interval
  3. 2mo agoprobmedFirst release: pmed() with the estimand corrected
  4. 3mo agocollinearNamespace, NA and sf fixes; example data moves to spatialData
  5. 8mo agocollinearAdaptive thresholds, multi-response support and a new output class
  6. 1y agocollinearCategorical responses, f_auto() defaults and future-based parallelism

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between collinear and probmed?

Both compete on the same themes — r package — within Analytics. collinear and probmed are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is collinear better than probmed?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. collinear and probmed are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to collinear?

Top collinear alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "collinear alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/collinear for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to probmed?

Top probmed alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "probmed alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/probmed for the full list with editorial commentary on each.