← Back to home
Comparison · Meetings

Asterisk vs Element Call

A side-by-side editorial comparison of Asterisk and Element Call — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Asterisk vs Element Call: at a glance

FeatureAsteriskElement Call
SectorMeetingsMeetings
Velocity score0.06.3
Sparks · 30d00
Top themestelephony, voip, security-release, long-term-supportmatrix, webrtc, federation, multi-sfu
Last editorial update2h ago1d ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is Asterisk?

Six branches patched inside thirteen minutes — Asterisk's security process is the story here

The entire visible window is a single coordinated security publish. Within thirteen minutes on 25 June, the project shipped security releases across every supported line at once: 23.4.1, 22.10.1, 21.12.3 and 20.20.1 on the standard branches, plus certified-22.8-cert3 and certified-20.7-cert11 on the certified track. Each carries roughly twenty commits and points at the same downloads infrastructure.

Read the full Asterisk trajectory →

What is Element Call?

Matrix's calling app stopped negotiating which server hosts a call and let federation do it

Element Call spent June switching its default to a multi-SFU model: every participant connects to the media server attached to their own homeserver, and streams from other homeservers are pulled in subscribe-only. That removes the negotiation step that used to decide which single SFU a whole call would run on. July since then has been surface work — a default gradient background, retiring the last colors from the old design system, and mobile layout fixes for landscape one-on-one and grid modes.

Read the full Element Call trajectory →

Asterisk vs Element Call: editorial side-by-side

A
Asterisk
MEETINGS
0.0

Six branches patched inside thirteen minutes — Asterisk's security process is the story here

◆ Current state

The entire visible window is a single coordinated security publish. Within thirteen minutes on 25 June, the project shipped security releases across every supported line at once: 23.4.1, 22.10.1, 21.12.3 and 20.20.1 on the standard branches, plus certified-22.8-cert3 and certified-20.7-cert11 on the certified track. Each carries roughly twenty commits and points at the same downloads infrastructure.

◆ Where it's heading

What this shows is the cost structure of a telephony platform with long-lived deployments: four standard branches and a separate certified track all have to receive the same fix on the same day. The engineering signal is not new capability but the ability to backport across six lines simultaneously, which is what enterprise PBX operators actually buy into.

◆ Prediction

Expect the next window to be regular branch releases across the same set of lines, with any further advisory triggering the identical simultaneous publish across all supported and certified branches.

E
Element Call
MEETINGS
6.3

Matrix's calling app stopped negotiating which server hosts a call and let federation do it

◆ Current state

Element Call spent June switching its default to a multi-SFU model: every participant connects to the media server attached to their own homeserver, and streams from other homeservers are pulled in subscribe-only. That removes the negotiation step that used to decide which single SFU a whole call would run on. July since then has been surface work — a default gradient background, retiring the last colors from the old design system, and mobile layout fixes for landscape one-on-one and grid modes.

◆ Where it's heading

The multi-SFU switch is the project finishing what federated calling implies: no participant's call quality should depend on which homeserver happened to win a negotiation. It was compatible for six months before becoming the default, and legacy single-SFU mode is still reachable in developer settings, which is how infrastructure changes get made in an ecosystem of independent operators. With that settled, attention has visibly moved to mobile presentation and design-system consolidation.

◆ Prediction

Expect the legacy single-SFU path to be retired once operators have migrated, and the mobile layout work to continue through the 0.23 line. Note that every entry here is a release candidate, so these tags mark what is being tested rather than what operators are running.

Alternatives to Asterisk and Element Call

Other Meetings products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Asterisk or Element Call.

See all Asterisk alternatives → · See all Element Call alternatives →

Recent activity from Asterisk and Element Call

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2d agoElement CallLandscape mobile calls get a proper one-on-one layout
  2. 16d agoElement CallGradient background by default and old design-system colors removed
  3. 1mo agoElement CallMulti-SFU becomes the default for calls
  4. 1mo agoAsteriskAsterisk 23.4.1 security release
  5. 1mo agoAsteriskAsterisk 22.10.1 security release
  6. 1mo agoAsteriskAsterisk 21.12.3 security release
  7. 1mo agoAsteriskAsterisk 20.20.1 security release
  8. 1mo agoAsteriskCertified Asterisk 22.8-cert3 security release
  9. 1mo agoAsteriskCertified Asterisk 20.7-cert11 security release
  10. 1mo agoElement Callmatrix_rtc_mode config option and typed homeserver errors
  11. 1mo agoElement CallDevice switcher labels and older WebView polyfill
  12. 2mo agoElement CallFast call switcher and portrait one-on-one layout

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Asterisk and Element Call?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Element Call is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is Asterisk better than Element Call?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Element Call is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Meetings products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to Asterisk?

Top Asterisk alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Asterisk alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/asterisk for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Element Call?

Top Element Call alternatives in Meetings are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Element Call alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/element-call for the full list with editorial commentary on each.