fillpattern
Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes
Comparison · Analytics
tEDM vs UCell
A side-by-side editorial comparison of tEDM and UCell — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:r-package
tEDM vs UCell: at a glance
What is tEDM?
The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling
tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.
What is UCell?
A rank-based gene signature scorer that has grown by adapting to whatever object format single-cell R uses next
UCell scores gene signatures in single-cell data using a rank-based metric that is robust to dataset composition. Its release history reads as a sequence of ecosystem accommodations: Bioconductor submission in 2.0, SmoothKNN() for k-nearest-neighbor smoothing of scores in 2.2, smoothing applied directly to expression slots in 2.4, Seurat v5 assay compatibility in 2.6, multi-layer Seurat v5 objects in 2.8, and a missing_genes parameter in 2.14 that lets callers impute or skip signature genes absent from the data. Version 2.16 tracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points at a new publication and a Python implementation, pyUCell.
tEDM vs UCell: editorial side-by-side
tEDM
0.0ANALYTICS
The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling
◆ Current state
tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.
◆ Where it's heading
tEDM moves in lockstep with spEDM. Configurable distance metrics, varying E/k/tau inputs, strict floating-point comparison and the S3 plotting font unification all appear in both packages within days or weeks, as does the maintainer surname correction. The recent balance has tilted toward correcting library and prediction index handling — the kind of repeated attention that suggests the indexing model was the weak point of the shared core.
◆ Prediction
Expect tEDM to keep inheriting the shared-core changes spEDM lands, with its own releases staying small and centred on cross-mapping parameter handling rather than new method surface.
UCell
0.0ANALYTICS
A rank-based gene signature scorer that has grown by adapting to whatever object format single-cell R uses next
◆ Current state
UCell scores gene signatures in single-cell data using a rank-based metric that is robust to dataset composition. Its release history reads as a sequence of ecosystem accommodations: Bioconductor submission in 2.0, SmoothKNN() for k-nearest-neighbor smoothing of scores in 2.2, smoothing applied directly to expression slots in 2.4, Seurat v5 assay compatibility in 2.6, multi-layer Seurat v5 objects in 2.8, and a missing_genes parameter in 2.14 that lets callers impute or skip signature genes absent from the data. Version 2.16 tracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points at a new publication and a Python implementation, pyUCell.
◆ Where it's heading
Two threads run through this. The scoring algorithm itself has barely changed — the rank-based core is stable, and 2.14's reformatting to gene indices rather than string matching is a speed change, not a method change. What does change constantly is object-format compatibility, which is the tax of living between Seurat and SingleCellExperiment. The pyUCell reference in 2.16 is the first sign of the method reaching beyond R, though these notes say nothing about its scope.
◆ Prediction
The cadence is locked to Bioconductor's twice-yearly release train, so the next version will most likely accompany Bioconductor 3.24 with whatever Seurat or SingleCellExperiment changes it brings.
Alternatives to tEDM and UCell
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either tEDM or UCell.
gcube
gcube's recent releases are all packaging metadata, not simulation code
cubist
The R port of Quinlan's Cubist gets reproducibility fixes, not new modelling
ggstats
ggstats keeps widening what a coefficient or Likert plot can be
ecodive
ecodive rebuilt itself into a broad diversity-metric library, breaking as it went
simStateSpace
State-space data simulation for R, filled in one function at a time
Recent activity from tEDM and UCell
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3mo agoUCellTracks Bioconductor 3.23 and points to a Python port
- 4mo agotEDMMaintainer name corrected, published paper cited
- 7mo agotEDMCross-mapping index handling corrected, generics accept varying E, k, tau
- 9mo agoUCellUCell version 2.14
- 11mo agotEDMConfigurable distance metrics for cross mapping
- 2y agoUCellUCell version 2.8
- 2y agoUCellUCell version 2.6
- 3y agoUCellUCell version 2.4
- 3y agoUCellUCell version 2.2
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between tEDM and UCell?
Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. tEDM and UCell are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is tEDM better than UCell?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. tEDM and UCell are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to tEDM?
Top tEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to UCell?
Top UCell alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "UCell alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ucell for the full list with editorial commentary on each.