← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

fillpattern vs tEDM

A side-by-side editorial comparison of fillpattern and tEDM — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

fillpattern vs tEDM: at a glance

FeaturefillpatterntEDM
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesggplot2, data-visualization, accessibility, graphicscausal-inference, time-series, empirical-dynamic-modeling, r-package
Last editorial update1h ago1h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is fillpattern?

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

Read the full fillpattern trajectory →

What is tEDM?

The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling

tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.

Read the full tEDM trajectory →

fillpattern vs tEDM: editorial side-by-side

F
fillpattern
ANALYTICS
0.0

Pattern fills for ggplot2, hardened against the ways users write sizes

◆ Current state

fillpattern provides pattern fills — stripes, bricks, dots — for ggplot2 and base R graphics, aimed at figures that must stay legible in greyscale or to colour-blind readers. The 1.0.3 release is mostly defensive: size modifier strings ending in a colon no longer swap width for height, modify_size() reports invalid units instead of crashing and understands in, inches and cm, and a background colour bug in scale_fill_pattern() is fixed. The minimum R version rises to 4.2.0 for recent graphics engine features.

◆ Where it's heading

Development is slow and entirely reactive to how the string-based size interface fails. The pattern across releases is the same: a user hits an edge — very small fill areas in 1.0.2, malformed unit strings in 1.0.3 — and the fix is either a graceful fallback or a clearer error. Leaning on R's newer graphics engine rather than reimplementing pattern rendering keeps the package small at the cost of raising its version floor.

◆ Prediction

Expect further releases to stay in the same register: parsing and validation fixes for the size and unit interface, with the pattern set itself unlikely to change.

T
tEDM
ANALYTICS
0.0

The temporal half of the stscl EDM pair, tracking its spatial sibling

◆ Current state

tEDM applies empirical dynamic modeling to time series — cross mapping, convergent cross mapping and the logistic map — as the temporal counterpart to spEDM, with which it shares a maintainer and a C++ core. The recent releases are consolidation rather than expansion: index handling in cross mapping corrected, generics taught to accept varying E, k and tau, and the associated paper now cited in the README. Only three releases are visible in the feed.

◆ Where it's heading

tEDM moves in lockstep with spEDM. Configurable distance metrics, varying E/k/tau inputs, strict floating-point comparison and the S3 plotting font unification all appear in both packages within days or weeks, as does the maintainer surname correction. The recent balance has tilted toward correcting library and prediction index handling — the kind of repeated attention that suggests the indexing model was the weak point of the shared core.

◆ Prediction

Expect tEDM to keep inheriting the shared-core changes spEDM lands, with its own releases staying small and centred on cross-mapping parameter handling rather than new method surface.

Alternatives to fillpattern and tEDM

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either fillpattern or tEDM.

See all fillpattern alternatives → · See all tEDM alternatives →

Recent activity from fillpattern and tEDM

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 4mo agotEDMMaintainer name corrected, published paper cited
  2. 6mo agofillpatternSize string parsing fixed; invalid units now report instead of crash
  3. 7mo agotEDMCross-mapping index handling corrected, generics accept varying E, k, tau
  4. 11mo agotEDMConfigurable distance metrics for cross mapping
  5. 2y agofillpatternSmall fill areas no longer crash; min_size falls back to solid
  6. 2y agofillpatternfillpattern 1.0.1

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between fillpattern and tEDM?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. fillpattern and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is fillpattern better than tEDM?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. fillpattern and tEDM are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to fillpattern?

Top fillpattern alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "fillpattern alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/fillpattern for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tEDM?

Top tEDM alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tEDM alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tedm for the full list with editorial commentary on each.