Slack
Slack raises the Marketplace bar back to ten installs while the agent platform consolidates.
Comparison · Comms
SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart
A side-by-side editorial comparison of SimpleX Chat and Stalwart — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Shared themes:self-hosting
SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart: at a glance
What is SimpleX Chat?
The no-identifier messenger is building public channels — and has to invent trust from scratch
SimpleX Chat is deep in a v7.0 beta cycle, six betas in, with the stable armv7a tag now cut. The release is dominated by channels: broadcast surfaces with subscribers, contributor and moderator roles, searchable subscriber lists, and CLI access. Alongside them sits SimpleX names — registerable, resolvable names for channels and businesses — and per-server role controls that let self-hosters run a relay that handles only message reception, private routing, or name resolution.
What is Stalwart?
SCIM v2 lands in the Enterprise tier, opening a provisioning surface beside the protocol work.
Stalwart ships weekly, and 0.16.20 breaks a long run of pure spec-completeness work by adding SCIM v2 to the Enterprise tier: core schema (RFC 7643), protocol (RFC 7644), cursor-based pagination (RFC 9865), the SCIM interoperability profile and the IPSIE lifecycle profile. The rest of the release is the established mix - conference links in calendar invites and alarms, 25 interface translations, and a fix run covering DANE lookup and failure semantics, Redis Sentinel deployments where rediss:// URLs connected to the master in cleartext, and cluster node leases that left removed nodes marked stale indefinitely.
SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart: editorial side-by-side
SimpleX Chat
6.3COMMS
The no-identifier messenger is building public channels — and has to invent trust from scratch
◆ Current state
SimpleX Chat is deep in a v7.0 beta cycle, six betas in, with the stable armv7a tag now cut. The release is dominated by channels: broadcast surfaces with subscribers, contributor and moderator roles, searchable subscriber lists, and CLI access. Alongside them sits SimpleX names — registerable, resolvable names for channels and businesses — and per-server role controls that let self-hosters run a relay that handles only message reception, private routing, or name resolution.
◆ Where it's heading
This is the hardest problem the project has taken on. SimpleX's premise is that users have no identifiers at all, and public channels need exactly the opposite: a stable name people can find and an author they can verify. The answer taking shape is cryptographic rather than account-based — message signing, member security-code verification, and name resolution run as an opt-in server function. The betas since then have shifted from adding channel features to hardening the role model, rejecting forwards from unexpected admins and locking relay-role assignment.
◆ Prediction
A 7.0 stable release looks imminent given the non-beta tag, with message signing held back for 7.1 as the notes state. Expect the next cycle to turn signing on and continue tightening who can act as a relay or admin inside a channel.
Stalwart
6.3COMMS
SCIM v2 lands in the Enterprise tier, opening a provisioning surface beside the protocol work.
◆ Current state
Stalwart ships weekly, and 0.16.20 breaks a long run of pure spec-completeness work by adding SCIM v2 to the Enterprise tier: core schema (RFC 7643), protocol (RFC 7644), cursor-based pagination (RFC 9865), the SCIM interoperability profile and the IPSIE lifecycle profile. The rest of the release is the established mix - conference links in calendar invites and alarms, 25 interface translations, and a fix run covering DANE lookup and failure semantics, Redis Sentinel deployments where rediss:// URLs connected to the master in cleartext, and cluster node leases that left removed nodes marked stale indefinitely.
◆ Where it's heading
The protocol gap-closing continues, with DANE, iMIP, CalDAV and JMAP absorbing corrections every release, but SCIM points at a different axis: who is expected to deploy this. Provisioning, per-tenant branding, cluster lease handling and the recovery-admin impersonation fixes are operator concerns rather than mail-standard concerns, and they have been accumulating since 0.16.15. Calendar remains the least settled surface, now extending into localization rather than correctness alone.
◆ Prediction
SCIM shipped with the interoperability and IPSIE profiles attached, so the near-term work is likely the directory-side corrections that follow first contact with real identity providers - the same pattern the LDAP and SQL directory integrations have been producing. The 25 new translations open a localization surface that has not yet had to survive a release cycle.
Alternatives to SimpleX Chat and Stalwart
Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either SimpleX Chat or Stalwart.
Synapse
Synapse publishes only a changelog link, so its feed records releases without describing them
Element X Android
Element X Android ships roughly weekly, alternating real features with fix rounds
Wire
Calling is the one surface Wire's web client touches in every documented release.
Zoho Cliq
Zoho retells Cliq 7.0 as an AI story, and lets customers pick whose model tells it.
Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat finishes the 8.8 calling work while the licence wall for SSO gets a date.
See all SimpleX Chat alternatives → · See all Stalwart alternatives →
Recent activity from SimpleX Chat and Stalwart
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 3d agoStalwartSCIM v2 provisioning lands in the Enterprise tier ⚡
- 8d agoStalwartMySQL key columns need a manual ALTER; Sieve gains spam-score vars
- 15d agoStalwartResource limits arrive for inbound reports and RocksDB caches
- 22d agoStalwartIMAP gains UIDONLY, UIDBATCHES and message-limit extensions
- 1mo agoStalwartJMAP delivery push arrives; strict relays stop rejecting calendar mail
- 1mo agoStalwartFix-only release: JMAP semantics and a credential escalation
- 1mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.6
- 1mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.5
- 1mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0.0-beta.4 ⚡
- 1mo agoSimpleX Chatv7.0 beta 3: registrable SimpleX names for channels
- 2mo agoSimpleX ChatSimpleX 7.0-beta.2: subscriber roles and CLI channel connect
- 2mo agoSimpleX ChatPromote channel subscribers to contributors (v7.0 beta.1)
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between SimpleX Chat and Stalwart?
Both compete on the same themes — self-hosting — within Comms. SimpleX Chat and Stalwart are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is SimpleX Chat better than Stalwart?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. SimpleX Chat and Stalwart are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 6.3 vs 6.3, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to SimpleX Chat?
Top SimpleX Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SimpleX Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/simplex-chat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Stalwart?
Top Stalwart alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Stalwart alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stalwart for the full list with editorial commentary on each.