← Back to home
Comparison · Comms

SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart

A side-by-side editorial comparison of SimpleX Chat and Stalwart — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart: at a glance

FeatureSimpleX ChatStalwart
SectorCommsComms
Velocity score6.35.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesmessaging, privacy, channels, betaemail-server, standards-compliance, email-authentication, jmap
Last editorial update4h ago20h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is SimpleX Chat?

SimpleX's v7.0 beta grows a private messenger into a public-channel network

SimpleX is deep in the v7.0 beta cycle, and the through-line is channels. Successive betas have added subscriber and contributor roles, CLI channel connections, obfuscated-link moderation, and now registered SimpleX names for channels and businesses. The metadata-free privacy model stays intact, but the product is growing a public broadcast surface it didn't previously have.

Read the full SimpleX Chat trajectory →

What is Stalwart?

Stalwart races to implement the newest email standards across its all-in-one server

Stalwart is an open-source, all-in-one mail and collaboration server (SMTP/IMAP/JMAP/CalDAV) shipping a fast 0.16.x point-release train. Recent releases are dominated by standards implementation and protocol-conformance work, layered over steady security hardening and a long tail of targeted bug fixes.

Read the full Stalwart trajectory →

SimpleX Chat vs Stalwart: editorial side-by-side

S6.3

SimpleX's v7.0 beta grows a private messenger into a public-channel network

◆ Current state

SimpleX is deep in the v7.0 beta cycle, and the through-line is channels. Successive betas have added subscriber and contributor roles, CLI channel connections, obfuscated-link moderation, and now registered SimpleX names for channels and businesses. The metadata-free privacy model stays intact, but the product is growing a public broadcast surface it didn't previously have.

◆ Where it's heading

Each beta hardens the channels stack — roles, moderation, web previews, relay management — while chipping away at connection stability and delivery in large groups. The move to registered SimpleX names for channels and business accounts points toward discoverable, addressable identities, a notable shift for a network built on unaddressed contact. The remaining betas look aimed at stabilizing delivery and finalizing the naming and business layer before a 7.0 stable.

◆ Prediction

The next beta most likely locks down the SimpleX names registration flow, currently gated behind test infrastructure, and continues group-delivery stability work ahead of a 7.0 stable release.

S5.0

Stalwart races to implement the newest email standards across its all-in-one server

◆ Current state

Stalwart is an open-source, all-in-one mail and collaboration server (SMTP/IMAP/JMAP/CalDAV) shipping a fast 0.16.x point-release train. Recent releases are dominated by standards implementation and protocol-conformance work, layered over steady security hardening and a long tail of targeted bug fixes.

◆ Where it's heading

The product is doubling down on being the most standards-complete self-hosted mail server: early DKIM2 and DMARCbis authentication, IDN support, encryption-at-rest for S/MIME, and a sustained push to pass the JMAP test suite. Security hardening runs alongside — DANE downgrade-attack defenses, auto-ban fixes, binary attestation on every build.

◆ Prediction

Expect continued rapid 0.16.x releases advancing draft email-authentication standards and JMAP conformance; a larger 0.17 or 1.0 milestone becomes likely once the JMAP suite fully passes and the DKIM2/DMARCbis drafts stabilize.

Alternatives to SimpleX Chat and Stalwart

Other Comms products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either SimpleX Chat or Stalwart.

See all SimpleX Chat alternatives → · See all Stalwart alternatives →

Recent activity from SimpleX Chat and Stalwart

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 5h agoSimpleX ChatSimpleX adds named channels and business accounts (v7.0 beta.3)
  2. 6h agoSimpleX Chatarmv7a build tag (no user-facing changes)
  3. 1d agoStalwartDKIM2 and DMARCbis email-authentication support
  4. 11d agoSimpleX ChatChannel subscriber roles and CLI channel connect (v7.0 beta.2)
  5. 11d agoSimpleX Chatarmv7a build tag (no user-facing changes)
  6. 12d agoStalwartEncryption-at-rest for S/MIME, Redis Sentinel backend
  7. 14d agoSimpleX ChatPromote channel subscribers to contributors (v7.0 beta.1)
  8. 14d agoSimpleX Chatarmv7a build tag (no user-facing changes)
  9. 16d agoStalwartIDN support and JMAP test-suite conformance

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SimpleX Chat and Stalwart?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. SimpleX Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is SimpleX Chat better than Stalwart?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. SimpleX Chat is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 6.3 vs 5.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Comms products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to SimpleX Chat?

Top SimpleX Chat alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "SimpleX Chat alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/simplex-chat for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to Stalwart?

Top Stalwart alternatives in Comms are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Stalwart alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/stalwart for the full list with editorial commentary on each.