← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

seriation vs spmodel

A side-by-side editorial comparison of seriation and spmodel — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

Shared themes:r-package

seriation vs spmodel: at a glance

Featureseriationspmodel
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score0.00.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesseriation, matrix-reordering, optimization, clusteringspatial-statistics, regression-modelling, kriging, r-package
Last editorial update44m ago9h ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is seriation?

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

Read the full seriation trajectory →

What is spmodel?

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

Read the full spmodel trajectory →

seriation vs spmodel: editorial side-by-side

S
seriation
ANALYTICS
0.0

seriation stopped shipping algorithms and started shipping a way to pick between them.

◆ Current state

seriation finds meaningful orderings for matrices, distance objects and dendrograms, and carries a large registry of methods from classic combinatorial criteria to t-SNE and UMAP embeddings. The 1.5.0 release added a layer above that registry — seriate_best(), seriate_rep() and seriate_improve() — which run randomized methods repeatedly, in parallel, and keep the best result. Recent work is definitional and numeric rather than additive: 1.5.8 corrects the linear seriation criterion to match Hubert and Schultz's original 1976 definition.

◆ Where it's heading

The package has shifted from breadth to judgment. Through 1.3.x the additions were new methods; from 1.5.0 the registry started carrying metadata about the methods — whether they are randomized, what criterion they optimize — so the package could choose and evaluate on the user's behalf. The 1.5.6 replacement of FORTRAN with C for BEA and ME points the same way, reducing the legacy surface underneath that machinery.

◆ Prediction

Further criterion audits are the likeliest next move, since 1.5.8 shows a published definition being reconciled against the implementation and the registry now records what each method optimizes. Expect corrections rather than new seriation algorithms.

S
spmodel
ANALYTICS
0.0

Spatial regression in R, adding block kriging and then tuning the numerics underneath it

◆ Current state

spmodel fits spatial linear and generalised linear models, for both point-referenced and areal data, with prediction and diagnostics attached. Block prediction arrived in 0.11.0 and the releases since have refined it. The most recent release changes optimiser behaviour: the default Nelder-Mead relative stopping tolerance tightens from 1e-4 to 1e-6 to reduce convergence on local rather than global maxima.

◆ Where it's heading

Two threads run in parallel. The first is expanding what can be predicted — point predictions, then areal averages over a region via block kriging, then better accuracy and efficiency for that path as the block size default moved from 1000 to 4000 in 0.12.0. The second is numerical trustworthiness, and it is unusually prominent here: a range-constraint option for stability in 0.9.0, a corrected log determinant of the fixed effects in the restricted log likelihood in 0.11.0, a cloud semivariogram that had been doubling the semivariance fixed in 0.11.1, and now a tighter optimiser tolerance. Several of these silently changed results before they were caught.

◆ Prediction

Expect the maintainers to keep publishing explicit reproduction instructions alongside numerical default changes, as 0.13.0 does by documenting the `control = list(reltol = 1e-4)` escape hatch. The entries give no signal of expansion beyond the current model families.

Alternatives to seriation and spmodel

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either seriation or spmodel.

See all seriation alternatives → · See all spmodel alternatives →

Recent activity from seriation and spmodel

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 2mo agospmodelTighter optimiser tolerance to avoid local maxima
  2. 6mo agospmodelEmpirical autocovariance function and better block kriging accuracy
  3. 9mo agospmodelCloud semivariogram doubling fixed; geometry warnings added
  4. 0y agoseriationseriation 1.5.8 realigns linear criterion with Hubert and Schultz
  5. 1y agospmodelBlock kriging for areal averages and their uncertainty
  6. 1y agospmodelRobust semivariogram and new covariance types for areal models
  7. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.7 adds BK_unconstrained, handles tiny inputs
  8. 1y agospmodelRange constraint option and redefined covariance type names
  9. 1y agoseriationseriation 1.5.6 replaces FORTRAN BEA with C, modernizes allocation
  10. 2y agoseriationseriation 1.5.5 digest: AOE method, rep parameter, MDS_angle fix
  11. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.1 refines pimage, permute and hmap
  12. 3y agoseriationseriation 1.5.0 adds seriate_best and parallel repeated search

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between seriation and spmodel?

Both compete on the same themes — r-package — within Analytics. seriation and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is seriation better than spmodel?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. seriation and spmodel are shipping at a similar cadence (velocity 0.0 vs 0.0, both within Sparkpulse's "active" band). For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to seriation?

Top seriation alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "seriation alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/seriation-r for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to spmodel?

Top spmodel alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "spmodel alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/spmodel for the full list with editorial commentary on each.