Rollbar
Rollbar now runs Resolve by itself: a new error can become a fix PR with no one starting it
Comparison · DevOps
Rivet vs Tines
A side-by-side editorial comparison of Rivet and Tines — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
Rivet vs Tines: at a glance
| Feature | Rivet | Tines |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | DevOps | DevOps |
| Velocity score | 7.5 | 5.0 |
| Sparks · 30d | 2 | 0 |
| Top themes | actors, serverless, storage engine, s3 | records, mcp, workload-identity, cases |
| Last editorial update | 6d ago | 2h ago |
| Website | — | Visit → |
What is Rivet?
Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.
Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.
What is Tines?
Tines opens Records to AI clients and removes stored keys from its cloud credentials
Records has been the busiest part of Tines this autumn. Version 2 of the records API added new read endpoints, records gained four new field types with validation, and AI clients on the Tines MCP server can now create, update and delete records and record types, not only read them. Cases search was rebuilt with full-text search and AND/OR filter groups. On the access side, Apps shared by SSO can be limited to identity-provider groups, and AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Entra and Oracle Cloud credentials can use workload identity federation, so no long-lived keys are stored.
Rivet vs Tines: editorial side-by-side
Rivet
7.5DEVOPS
Rivet 3.0 Preview runs as one stateless binary on WarpDrive, with S3 as its only dependency.
◆ Current state
Rivet has spent two months building infrastructure for long-lived actors and AI agents: BYOC in customer clouds, OpenTelemetry tracing, actor-scoped JWTs, Pi agent runtimes and agentOS Hosted VMs. On October 5 it said 3.0 would replace NATS with S3. The October 26 3.0 Preview delivers that: a new storage engine, WarpDrive, promises bottomless storage on S3 at SSD speed, and Rivet becomes a single stateless binary.
◆ Where it's heading
Each release removes operational burden: BYOC moved the control plane into the customer's cloud, and 3.0 reduces the self-hosted footprint to one binary plus an S3 bucket. The agent work (Pi, agentOS) sits on top as the main workload Rivet is courting.
◆ Prediction
Expect benchmarks and migration guidance for 2.x users during the preview, followed by a 3.0 GA. The entry gives no performance numbers, so the SSD-speed claim is unverified.
Tines
5.0DEVOPS
Tines opens Records to AI clients and removes stored keys from its cloud credentials
◆ Current state
Records has been the busiest part of Tines this autumn. Version 2 of the records API added new read endpoints, records gained four new field types with validation, and AI clients on the Tines MCP server can now create, update and delete records and record types, not only read them. Cases search was rebuilt with full-text search and AND/OR filter groups. On the access side, Apps shared by SSO can be limited to identity-provider groups, and AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Entra and Oracle Cloud credentials can use workload identity federation, so no long-lived keys are stored.
◆ Where it's heading
Records is turning from a table inside a story into a data layer that outside software, including AI clients, can read and change. The MCP write access matters most here, because it lets an external assistant alter tenant data that stories depend on. The credentials and SSO work moves in step with it: as more clients reach further in, Tines narrows who gets in and what secrets sit on its side.
◆ Prediction
Expect the records API, which has so far only received new read endpoints in v2, to gain write endpoints on the same model. The SSO group restriction is likely to spread to Collections, which share the same SSO model.
Alternatives to Rivet and Tines
Other DevOps products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either Rivet or Tines.
Apache Kafka
Kafka 4.4 hardens share groups and Streams, then 4.3.2 patches two data-loss risks a day later
HashiCorp
Terraform 1.16 brings more of the infrastructure lifecycle back inside Terraform
Okta
Okta adds TypeScript to its Cross App Access guides and dates the end of Classic Engine features
pgBackRest
pgBackRest 2.60 now stops a restore when a page checksum is bad
Browser Use
Browser Use opens BU Ultrafast to every US plan, free tier included
Recent activity from Rivet and Tines
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
- 7d agoRivetIntroducing Rivet 3.0 Preview ⚡
- 17d agoTinesKeyless cloud credentials with workload identity federation
- 18d agoTinesFull-text search and filter groups in Cases
- 21d agoRivetIntroducing agentOS 0.4 & Hosted VMs
- 23d agoTinesCreate, update, and delete Records via the Tines MCP
- 25d agoTinesNew field types for records
- 25d agoTinesRestrict apps to specific SSO groups
- 26d agoRivetIntroducing Pi Durable for Rivet
- 28d agoRivetReplacing Our Message Broker with... S3? ⚡
- 1mo agoRivetIntroducing Pi 1.0 for Rivet
- 1mo agoTinesRecords API v2: Read with fewer calls, faster searches
- 1mo agoRivetIntroducing JWT Authentication for Rivet Actors
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Rivet and Tines?
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Is Rivet better than Tines?
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. Rivet is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 7.5 vs 5.0), with 2 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other DevOps products to evaluate alongside.
What are the best alternatives to Rivet?
Top Rivet alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Rivet alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/rivet for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
What are the best alternatives to Tines?
Top Tines alternatives in DevOps are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "Tines alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tines for the full list with editorial commentary on each.