← Back to home
Comparison · Analytics

ribd vs tibblify

A side-by-side editorial comparison of ribd and tibblify — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.

ribd vs tibblify: at a glance

Featureribdtibblify
SectorAnalyticsAnalytics
Velocity score2.50.0
Sparks · 30d00
Top themesstatistical-genetics, pedigree-analysis, relatedness-coefficients, r-packagesr, json, data rectangling, openapi
Last editorial update2h ago12m ago
WebsiteVisit →Visit →

What is ribd?

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

Read the full ribd trajectory →

What is tibblify?

tibblify learned to derive its own specs from OpenAPI, removing the step users disliked most

tibblify converts nested lists and JSON into rectangular tibbles using an explicit specification of the expected structure. Its 0.2.0 rewrite moved the engine to C and reset the API; 0.3.1 then added a path to generate specifications from an OpenAPI document rather than hand-writing them. 0.4.0 in May 2026 is the first release in over two years, and it is a breaking cleanup.

Read the full tibblify trajectory →

ribd vs tibblify: editorial side-by-side

R
ribd
ANALYTICS
2.5

The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.

◆ Current state

ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from generality to presentation to precision. Early releases replaced narrow functions with general ones, most visibly when gKinship() absorbed generalisedKinship() and identityCoefs() superseded the separate autosomal and X-chromosomal identity functions in favour of an Xchrom argument. The middle stretch turned the IBD triangle into a proper plotting surface across three graphics systems. The current phase reads as consolidation, with the newest release listing six bug fixes against four features, several of them alignment errors in output tables, which is where a coefficient library most needs to be exactly right.

◆ Prediction

The two new internal functions in the latest release, inbreedingContributions() and ancestralKinship(), are the kind of thing that surfaces publicly a release or two later, so expect them to become exported decomposition tools. The correctness push through pedigree lists and edge cases suggests the near-term focus stays on hardening rather than new coefficient families.

T
tibblify
ANALYTICS
0.0

tibblify learned to derive its own specs from OpenAPI, removing the step users disliked most

◆ Current state

tibblify converts nested lists and JSON into rectangular tibbles using an explicit specification of the expected structure. Its 0.2.0 rewrite moved the engine to C and reset the API; 0.3.1 then added a path to generate specifications from an OpenAPI document rather than hand-writing them. 0.4.0 in May 2026 is the first release in over two years, and it is a breaking cleanup.

◆ Where it's heading

The arc runs from 'write a spec by hand' toward 'the spec comes from somewhere else'. Alongside the OpenAPI importer, guess_tspec() gained exported variants so users can override its dispatch, and untibblify() now picks up the tib_spec attribute automatically. 0.4.0's breaking change prefixes all arguments of dot-accepting functions with a period to avoid collisions with column names, softened by a once-per-session deprecation warning, and refactors the entire codebase.

◆ Prediction

The un-dotted argument forms are explicitly slated for removal, so the next release most likely completes that deprecation. Whether the 0.4.0 refactor introduced corner-case regressions is the open question the release notes themselves raise.

Alternatives to ribd and tibblify

Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ribd or tibblify.

See all ribd alternatives → · See all tibblify alternatives →

Recent activity from ribd and tibblify

Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.

  1. 12d agoribdCustom relationships on the IBD triangle; six alignment and edge-case fixes
  2. 3mo agotibblifyFix type mismatch in C code
  3. 3mo agotibblifyDot-prefixed arguments and a full internal refactor
  4. 1y agoribdkappaIBD() can skip across-component pairs on large pedigrees
  5. 2y agoribdIBD triangle plots gain ggplot2 and plotly backends, plus inset pedigrees
  6. 2y agotibblifyparse_openapi_spec() generates tibblify specs from API documentation
  7. 3y agoribdTriangle line clipping, automatic plot margins, citation info
  8. 3y agotibblifyRecursive specs, transform control and memory fixes
  9. 3y agoribdTwo-locus functions overhauled; twoLocusInbreeding and ELR added
  10. 4y agotibblifyEngine rewritten in C with a renamed specification API
  11. 4y agoribdIdentity coefficients unified behind identityCoefs() and an Xchrom argument

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between ribd and tibblify?

They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.

Is ribd better than tibblify?

Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.

What are the best alternatives to ribd?

Top ribd alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ribd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ribd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.

What are the best alternatives to tibblify?

Top tibblify alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tibblify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tibblify for the full list with editorial commentary on each.