spsurvey
spsurvey has spent four years consolidating after its 5.0.0 rewrite rather than adding to it
A side-by-side editorial comparison of ribd and tibblify — release velocity, themes, recent moves, and the top alternatives to consider.
The pedsuite's coefficient engine: broadening what it computes, then making the plots publishable.
ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.
tibblify learned to derive its own specs from OpenAPI, removing the step users disliked most
tibblify converts nested lists and JSON into rectangular tibbles using an explicit specification of the expected structure. Its 0.2.0 rewrite moved the engine to C and reset the API; 0.3.1 then added a path to generate specifications from an OpenAPI document rather than hand-writing them. 0.4.0 in May 2026 is the first release in over two years, and it is a breaking cleanup.
ribd computes relatedness coefficients from pedigrees, covering kinship, inbreeding, kappa, condensed and detailed identity coefficients, and two-locus versions of several of these, in autosomal and X-chromosomal form. The IBD triangle is now drawable in base graphics, ggplot2 or plotly, with an optional inset pedigree, and custom relationships can be placed on it. The most recent release is dominated by correctness work, fixing pair ordering and row alignment in coefficient tables and edge cases for pedigree lists, unrelated individuals and self-pairs.
The arc runs from generality to presentation to precision. Early releases replaced narrow functions with general ones, most visibly when gKinship() absorbed generalisedKinship() and identityCoefs() superseded the separate autosomal and X-chromosomal identity functions in favour of an Xchrom argument. The middle stretch turned the IBD triangle into a proper plotting surface across three graphics systems. The current phase reads as consolidation, with the newest release listing six bug fixes against four features, several of them alignment errors in output tables, which is where a coefficient library most needs to be exactly right.
The two new internal functions in the latest release, inbreedingContributions() and ancestralKinship(), are the kind of thing that surfaces publicly a release or two later, so expect them to become exported decomposition tools. The correctness push through pedigree lists and edge cases suggests the near-term focus stays on hardening rather than new coefficient families.
tibblify converts nested lists and JSON into rectangular tibbles using an explicit specification of the expected structure. Its 0.2.0 rewrite moved the engine to C and reset the API; 0.3.1 then added a path to generate specifications from an OpenAPI document rather than hand-writing them. 0.4.0 in May 2026 is the first release in over two years, and it is a breaking cleanup.
The arc runs from 'write a spec by hand' toward 'the spec comes from somewhere else'. Alongside the OpenAPI importer, guess_tspec() gained exported variants so users can override its dispatch, and untibblify() now picks up the tib_spec attribute automatically. 0.4.0's breaking change prefixes all arguments of dot-accepting functions with a period to avoid collisions with column names, softened by a once-per-session deprecation warning, and refactors the entire codebase.
The un-dotted argument forms are explicitly slated for removal, so the next release most likely completes that deprecation. Whether the 0.4.0 refactor introduced corner-case regressions is the open question the release notes themselves raise.
Other Analytics products tracked by Sparkpulse, ranked by recent ship velocity. Each card links to a full editorial trajectory and lets you pivot into a head-to-head comparison with either ribd or tibblify.
spsurvey has spent four years consolidating after its 5.0.0 rewrite rather than adding to it
StreamCatTools is quietly moving off web services and onto cloud-native GeoParquet
reproducible added a windowed read path so remote GeoTiffs never fully download
qcTAF is building an automated checklist for reproducible fisheries assessments, one criterion at a time
After three dormant years, rpymat returned to fix the OpenMP crash that breaks R and conda together
ieegio's first release lands electrode trajectory burning and a WebGL-free surface plot
See all ribd alternatives → · See all tibblify alternatives →
Latest ship moves from both products, interleaved chronologically. ⚡ = editorial spark.
They serve adjacent needs but don't currently overlap on shipped themes. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. See the at-a-glance table above for a side-by-side breakdown of velocity, recent sparks, and editorial themes.
Sparkpulse doesn't pick a winner — we score release velocity, not feature parity. ribd is currently shipping more aggressively (velocity 2.5 vs 0.0), with 0 editorial sparks in the last 30 days against 0. For your specific use case, the alternatives sections above list other Analytics products to evaluate alongside.
Top ribd alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "ribd alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/ribd for the full list with editorial commentary on each.
Top tibblify alternatives in Analytics are ranked by recent ship velocity. Browse the "tibblify alternatives" section above for the current picks, or visit /alternatives/tibblify for the full list with editorial commentary on each.